Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$45.94
▼ $0.78 (-1.7%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:19 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
$6.26B
Day Range
$45.65 - $46.53
52-Week Range
$34.10 - $49.62
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$45.65
Resistance
$49.62
+23.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $76.05 vs. price $45.94 (+65.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
19
Risk
64
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
50
Institutional
90
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) has primarily focused on its status as a Dividend King with a strong track record of dividend growth, though its performance has lagged behind the broader market in some periods. Analysts have highlighted its potential as a dividend stock, with upgrades to "Buy" and price target increases, while earnings comparisons in Q2 against regional banks were noted. The company remains under discussion for its stability and resilience amid broader market trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about United Bankshares, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 5 of the last 10 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
87
Fundamentals
50
Technical
19
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 46/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for UBSI reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors approach valuation and risk. The highest-scoring methodologies—like Smith’s ‘buy-and-hold for a decade’ and Nelson’s cycle-based optimism—prioritize long-term fundamentals and macro positioning, seeing this stock as a patient’s dream with favorable technical or secular tailwinds. Meanwhile, Graham’s Defensive and Enterprising approaches split sharply: the former finds it attractive for capital preservation, while the latter dismisses it as lacking the extreme undervaluation of his ‘net-net’ standard. Fisher and Bagehot’s low scores stem from a lack of granular data to assess qualitative factors (like management or industry moats) or balance-sheet depth, whereas Livermore’s caution aligns with his trend-following discipline, where UBSI’s lack of clear direction makes it unattractive. Even among growth-oriented models like Lynch and Housel, the scores diverge—Lynch sees untapped upside in growth, while Housel’s patient, compounder-focused lens overlaps with Smith’s but with slightly more nuance on risk tolerance.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 90
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 86
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 78
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 77
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 69
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 61
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 49
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 37
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.5%
ROA
1.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.28
Cash
$2.54B
Total Debt
$730.39M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.13
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.380 |
| 12.6.2026 | $0.380 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.380 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.380 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.370 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.370 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.370 |
| 13.12.2024 | $0.370 |
| 13.9.2024 | $0.370 |
| 14.6.2024 | $0.370 |
| 7.3.2024 | $0.370 |
| 7.12.2023 | $0.370 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$45.94
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$76.05
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+65.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $529.26M | $485.56M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $572.22M | $481.63M |
| 3 | 6.2% | $607.96M | $469.45M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $634.54M | $449.52M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $650.40M | $422.72M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$481.19M
Terminal Value
$10.26B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$6.67B
Enterprise Value
$8.97B
Net Debt
$-1.81B
Equity Value
$10.79B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$38.75
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$24.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 10 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 26.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.7.2026
Yahoo · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.7.2026
United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
UBSI currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, UBSI's estimated fair value is $76.05, which is 65.6% above the current price of $45.94. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
UBSI's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $76.05 vs. price $45.94 (+65.6%); Net income growth: 24.6%; ATR: 1.6% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -5.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — UBSI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 9 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NESSELROAD MARK R | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 32,224 | -3,200 | $46.42 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 59,287 | +609 | $47.18 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 4.8.2026 | 58,678 | +51 | $48.77 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 30.7.2026 | 58,627 | +158 | $48.56 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 58,469 | +470 | $46.37 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 57,999 | +7 | $42.31 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 15.5.2026 | 57,992 | +744 | $42.06 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 1.4.2026 | 57,248 | +512 | $42.03 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 4.3.2026 | 56,736 | +62 | $41.70 |
| WINTER P CLINTON | Open Market Purchase | 25.2.2026 | 56,674 | +710 | $42.54 |
| ADAMS RICHARD M SR | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.2.2026 | 893,274 | +16,008 | — |
| ADAMS RICHARD M SR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 890,975 | -2,299 | $44.28 |
| ADAMS RICHARD M SR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 883,715 | -7,260 | $44.28 |
| ADAMS RICHARD M JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.2.2026 | 196,547 | +17,087 | — |
| ADAMS RICHARD M JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 194,093 | -2,454 | $44.28 |
| ADAMS RICHARD M JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 186,344 | -7,749 | $44.28 |
| CONSAGRA JAMES J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.2.2026 | 156,534 | +13,978 | — |
| CONSAGRA JAMES J JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 154,526 | -2,008 | $44.28 |
| CONSAGRA JAMES J JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 148,186 | -6,340 | $44.28 |
| KAYES HENRY M JR | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 37,580 | -413 | $44.28 |
| Williams Darren K | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.2.2026 | 48,316 | +4,252 | — |
| Williams Darren K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 47,704 | -612 | $44.28 |
| Williams Darren K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 45,654 | -2,050 | $44.28 |
| Ernest Douglas Bryan | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.2.2026 | 54,012 | +3,752 | — |
| Ernest Douglas Bryan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.2.2026 | 53,472 | -540 | $44.28 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,167,574 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,590,957 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology