Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Information Technology · ·
$337.50
▼ $4.07 (-1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/21 03:48 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$13.82B
Day Range
$333.85 - $340.64
52-Week Range
$270.71 - $538.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$282.82
Resistance
$393.53
TYL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-36.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.16
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $269.50 vs. price $337.50 (-20.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (64/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
64
Quality
47
Value
33
Momentum
33
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
63
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING TYL...
Recent media coverage of Tyler Technologies has centered on its expanding public-sector AI and cloud solutions, with Nebraska adopting its Resident AI Assistant statewide after a successful DMV pilot, reducing call volumes by up to 20%. The company also secured Alabama’s cloud-based recreational licensing system contract. Additionally, financial analysts praised its Q2 earnings and raised price targets, while CEO Lynn Moore Jr. sold nearly $3.4 million in shares, sparking discussion about insider trading trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tyler Technologies. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
63
Technical
33
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The data suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect, with euphoria and overconfidence driving behavior despite modest momentum. The stock’s +29% premium to DCF and +9.8% above its 200-day average imply investors may be overestimating fundamentals. The narrative gap (36 points) indicates a potential misalignment between perceived value and reality. Key open question: *Is the premium justified by future growth, or is it a speculative bubble?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nebraska adopted its Resident AI Assistant for statewide use after a successful DMV pilot, cutting call volumes by up to 20%."
"Alabama’s conservation department went live with Tyler’s new cloud-based recreational licensing system."
"LYNN MOORE JR sold $3.45M of Tyler stock while maintaining a large stake."
"BTIG maintained its buy rating on Guidewire Software and raised its price target from $175 to $200."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between momentum-driven and fundamental approaches. Jesse Livermore’s high score suggests the stock exhibits the sharp price trends he favored, while the majority of methodologies—especially those rooted in valuation (Graham) or cycle analysis (Marks, Nelson)—flag it as overvalued or stretched. Schwager’s neutral stance contrasts with Livermore’s bullishness, highlighting a lack of clear technical edge, while Fisher and Lynch dismiss it outright for lacking growth or quality. Meanwhile, Veblen and Bogle’s caution underscores doubts about whether the stock’s growth translates to sustainable profit or if it’s already priced for perfection, bridging the gap between speculative and disciplined investing.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 71
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 49
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 44
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 16
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.5%
Operating Margin
15.3%
Net Margin
13.5%
EBITDA Margin
21.3%
ROE
8.5%
ROA
5.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.32
Cash
$1.02B
Total Debt
$599.66M
Current Ratio
1.05
Debt/Equity
0.16
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$337.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$269.50
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-20.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0% | $688.79M | $631.91M |
| 2 | 6.7% | $734.63M | $618.32M |
| 3 | 5.3% | $773.34M | $597.16M |
| 4 | 3.9% | $803.39M | $569.14M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $823.47M | $535.20M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$637.53M
Terminal Value
$12.99B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$8.44B
Enterprise Value
$11.39B
Net Debt
$-415.74M
Equity Value
$11.81B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$84.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 5 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Motley Fool · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Tyler Technologies (TYL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TYL currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TYL's estimated fair value is $269.50, which is 20.1% below the current price of $337.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TYL's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.16; Price is above the 50-day average; +19.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $269.50 vs. price $337.50 (-20.1%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -4.9% / max drawdown 57.4%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TYL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOORE H LYNN JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 9,250 | +9,250 | $205.66 |
| MOORE H LYNN JR | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 9,250 | -9,250 | — |
| MOORE H LYNN JR | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 9,250 | -9,250 | $372.79 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 16,284 | +8,500 | $143.42 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 0 | -8,500 | — |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 7,784 | -8,500 | $356.44 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 8,500 | +8,500 | $143.42 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 8,500 | -8,500 | $356.44 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 8,500 | -8,500 | — |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 15.085 | +15.085 | $248.59 |
| Puckett Jeffrey David | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7,784 | +15 | $248.59 |
| MILLER BRIAN K | Gift | 15.6.2026 | 90 | -90 | — |
| MILLER BRIAN K | Gift | 15.6.2026 | 25,305 | -90 | — |
| Teed Andrew D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Cline Brenda A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
| Carter Margot Lebenberg | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
| Pope Daniel M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Hawkins Ronnie D. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Carter Margot Lebenberg | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Teed Andrew D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
| Carter Glenn A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Pope Daniel M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
| Cline Brenda A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | +452 | — |
| Hawkins Ronnie D. Jr. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
| Carter Glenn A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.5.2026 | 452 | -452 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,836,621 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,499,275 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology