Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$25.73
▼ $1.00 (-3.7%)
Market data updated: 09/21 07:50 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$25.62 - $26.73
52-Week Range
$16.56 - $31.30
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$24.72
Resistance
$31.30
+2.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $86.96 vs. price $25.73 (+238.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
17d ago · $29.28
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
17d ago · $29.28
Evidence: 8 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 4, 2026
Then
74
$29.28
Now
63
$25.73
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
47
Value
57
Momentum
39
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
78
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of TWFG, Inc. has centered on its financial adjustments and analyst reactions. Notably, the company amended its credit facility to **$125 million** with an extended maturity to **2031**, signaling financial flexibility. Analysts, including **Morgan Stanley** (upgraded to *Overweight* with a **$30** price target) and **JP Morgan** (neutral but with a **$28** target), have expressed mixed but cautiously optimistic views, citing challenges in the property & casualty (P&C) insurance cycle. Earnings discussions also highlighted growth pressures amid declining premiums.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TWFG, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
30
Fundamentals
78
Technical
39
Valuation
57
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+22%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (20-point divergence) where euphoric momentum and peer underperformance drive herding, despite valuation disconnects. The high euphoria score (35) and detached price-to-DCF (-68%) imply investors may be ignoring fundamentals, while the dominant herding (50) reflects relative underperformance today. The key question: *Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will peer outperformance trigger rebalancing?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 07:58 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Morgan Stanley upgrades TWFG to Overweight, raises price target to $30"
"UBS raises price target to $34 from $30"
"TWFG expands Credit Facility to $125 million, enhancing capacity"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score and the rest of the methodologies highlights a fundamental divide in how these investors evaluate stability versus growth. Bagehot’s near-universal endorsement—rooted in liquidity and resilience—suggests he’d see this stock as a defensive asset during crises, while Lynch and Veblen’s high scores imply they’d focus on its growth potential, assuming the price hasn’t fully reflected its future earnings. Meanwhile, Fisher and Smith’s mid-range scores reflect a cautious optimism, acknowledging solid fundamentals but lacking the exceptional quality or clarity for long-term holds. The lower scores from Graham, Marks, and Livermore reveal deeper skepticism: Graham’s strict valuation tests and Marks’ late-cycle concerns suggest overvaluation or market fatigue, while Livermore’s neutral stance hints at a lack of clear directional momentum. Even the crowd-aware Mackay and the index-neutral Efficient Market Theory methodologies see only moderate signals, reinforcing the tension between growth-driven enthusiasm and more conservative or cyclical caution.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 68
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
14.9%
Net Margin
16.6%
EBITDA Margin
22.3%
ROE
49.4%
ROA
11.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.53
Cash
$155.93M
Total Debt
$4.01M
Current Ratio
5.12
Debt/Equity
0.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$25.73
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$86.96
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+238.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
17.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.4% | $62.39M | $57.24M |
| 2 | 13.7% | $70.93M | $59.70M |
| 3 | 10.0% | $77.98M | $60.22M |
| 4 | 6.2% | $82.84M | $58.69M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $84.91M | $55.19M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$53.15M
Terminal Value
$1.34B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$870.24M
Enterprise Value
$1.16B
Net Debt
$-151.92M
Equity Value
$1.31B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$3.66
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
MarketBeat · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Moby · 6.8.2026
ChartMill · 5.8.2026
TWFG, Inc. (TWFG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TWFG currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TWFG's estimated fair value is $86.96, which is 238.0% above the current price of $25.73. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TWFG's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $86.96 vs. price $25.73 (+238.0%); Revenue growth (last year): 22.0%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 178.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 5.2% of price; Calmar: 0.15 (3y annualized return 7.7% / max drawdown 52.7%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for TWFG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nolan Katherine C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 11,559 | -11,559 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 17,733 | -17,733 | $26.35 |
| Benes Julie E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 6,171 | -6,171 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Charles Alexander | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 6,163 | -6,163 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 17,733 | -17,733 | $26.35 |
| Zwinggi Janice E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 7,710 | -7,710 | $26.35 |
| Nolan Katherine C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 82,049 | -11,559 | $26.35 |
| Benes Julie E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 37,454 | -6,171 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 313,596 | -17,733 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 313,596 | -17,733 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Charles Alexander | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 36,523 | -6,163 | $26.35 |
| Zwinggi Janice E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 57,314 | -7,710 | $26.35 |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| DOAK MICHAEL | Open Market Purchase | 5.6.2026 | 7,865 | +7,865 | $19.45 |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | -264,784 | — |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | -264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Richard F. III | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 529,568 | -529,568 | — |
| Bunch Michelle Caroline | Gift | 5.6.2026 | 264,784 | +264,784 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
607,289 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 539,997 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 68.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology