Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$82.52
▼ $1.88 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/30 11:10 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$4.34B
Day Range
$82.36 - $85.21
52-Week Range
$57.90 - $102.30
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$76.48
Resistance
$102.30
TPC is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+25.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $222.07 vs. price $82.52 (+169.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
47
Value
57
Momentum
33
Risk
64
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
42
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) has centered on its financial performance and strategic growth opportunities. Analysts highlight its strong Q2 earnings, including record revenue of $1.64 billion and a shift toward higher-margin megaprojects, reinforcing its position in the construction sector. Speculation also surrounds potential acquisitions, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, where a $4.6 billion pipeline could drive future expansion. Investors are cautiously optimistic about TPC’s stock valuation and long-term prospects.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tutor Perini Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
42
Technical
33
Valuation
57
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior suggests participants are aligning with peers (+1.3% peer gain vs. +1.0% today) rather than acting on isolated signals. While euphoria lingers (+7.8% above 200-day average), the -60% DCF discount and muted volatility (0.86x ATR) temper exuberance. The key question: is this herding a reaction to broader sector momentum or a delayed response to unresolved narrative gaps (narrativeScore 46 vs. realityScore 38)?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 07:01 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"TPC's results confirm the transition to higher-margin megaprojects, with a record $1.64B revenue and $117.7M construction income"
"Is TPC Stock The Construction Sector's Next Big Takeover Target?"
"Tutor Perini (TPC) Stock Trades Below Fair Value Despite A Huge Run"
"Can TPC's $4.6B Indo-Pacific Pipeline Fuel Its Next Growth Leg?"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TPC reflects deep methodological disagreements about what makes a stock attractive. Lynch, Nelson, and Smith—all growth-oriented—see strong potential, with Lynch calling it a 'growth candidate' where the price hasn’t yet matched its upside, while Smith even suggests a 'buy and hold for a decade' play. Meanwhile, Marks and Fisher temper enthusiasm: Marks flags potentially inflated expectations, and Fisher, who prioritized exceptional quality, rates it only 'solid,' not exceptional. At the other end, Graham’s strict valuation rules and Schwager’s lack of technical setup lead to outright rejection, while Livermore’s trend-following discipline and the efficient-market camp dismiss it outright. Even within the same investor’s framework (e.g., Marks’ mixed verdict vs. his cycle-based caution), nuances in focus—growth vs. valuation vs. timing—create a spectrum from bullish to bearish.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 89
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 79
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 49
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
11.7%
Operating Margin
4.2%
Net Margin
1.5%
EBITDA Margin
5.1%
ROE
6.6%
ROA
1.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.53
Cash
$734.55M
Total Debt
$407.37M
Current Ratio
1.27
Debt/Equity
0.33
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.8.2026 | $0.090 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.060 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.060 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.060 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.060 |
| 9.12.2025 | $0.060 |
| 8.12.2025 | $0.060 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$82.52
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$222.07
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+169.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
14.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.0% | $646.58M | $593.19M |
| 2 | 11.1% | $718.48M | $604.73M |
| 3 | 8.2% | $777.72M | $600.55M |
| 4 | 5.4% | $819.51M | $580.56M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $840.00M | $545.94M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$567.21M
Terminal Value
$13.25B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$8.61B
Enterprise Value
$11.53B
Net Debt
$-327.18M
Equity Value
$11.86B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$22.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.78
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
TPC currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, TPC's estimated fair value is $222.07, which is 169.1% above the current price of $82.52. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
TPC's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $222.07 vs. price $82.52 (+169.1%); Revenue growth (last year): 28.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 148.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — TPC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 18 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,634,967 | -1,500,000 | $85.57 |
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 701,477 | -10,000 | $89.86 |
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 733,255 | -800,000 | $85.57 |
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,500,000 | -1,500,000 | $85.57 |
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 800,000 | -800,000 | $85.57 |
| TUTOR RONALD N | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $89.86 |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Gift | 28.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | — |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Gift | 28.8.2026 | 57,178 | -600 | — |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 7,400 | -7,400 | $92.02 |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $92.07 |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 31,203 | -6,000 | $92.07 |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 57,778 | -7,400 | $92.02 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 36,487 | -36,487 | $97.50 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 32,661 | -32,661 | $95.66 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 52,579 | -52,579 | $96.26 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 62,482 | -62,482 | $98.18 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 158,248 | -32,661 | $95.66 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 69,182 | -36,487 | $97.50 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 105,669 | -52,579 | $96.26 |
| FELTENSTEIN SIDNEY J | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 6,700 | -62,482 | $98.18 |
| DIEU HENRY | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 19.6.2026 | 1,191 | -1,191 | — |
| Ariqat Ghassan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.6.2026 | 13,332 | -13,332 | $77.99 |
| Jensen William E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 19.6.2026 | 26,203 | -26,203 | — |
| Ariqat Ghassan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 19.6.2026 | 26,203 | +26,203 | — |
| DIEU HENRY | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.6.2026 | 522 | -522 | $77.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,935,608 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,095,489 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology