Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$49.98
▼ $17.35 (-25.8%)
Market data updated: 10/01 04:31 AM
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
$375.10M
Day Range
$43.06 - $74.74
52-Week Range
$3.12 - $74.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$5.90
Resistance
$74.74
SVRN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+116.4% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 9/15 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 14.9% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
77
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
77
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
🕵️ What the Detective found on SVRN
Detective Score 90/100 · 3 signals convergingOverall, the signals found here lean positive.
🧠 What the Detective thinks
מניית OceanPal Inc. (SVRN) מציגה כרגע תבנית חריגה של התנהגות משותפת בין שלושה סיגנלים: ראשית, המניה חווה 'תאוצה' טכנית חריגה עם התאמה גבוהה של 9 סימנים טכניים חיוביים מול 3 שליליים, מה שמצביע על תנופה חזקה ומתמשכת. שנית, היא 'נשברה' ממגמת יום יום ללא גבולות מסחריים מוגדרים, כלומר היא עוברת את רמות המחיר הקודמות בצורה ברורה ואינטנסיבית. שלישית, המניה זולה ב-25.2 נקודות בסיס (pp) מהממוצע של התעשייה שלה, מה שמעיד על פוטנציאל תיקון יחסי לעומת שאר חברות בתעשייה. כל שלושה הסיגנלים מתכנסים כאן יחדיו, מה שמעלה את הסיכוי שהמניה נמצאת במצב פעיל ומרתק תשומת לב.
What this means now: Several different technical indicators are currently agreeing on the same direction at once — that's unusual; most days they contradict each other.
Why it matters: When several technical indicators agree at once, that's usually more reliable than any single indicator alone.
What this means now: The price has formed a distinct technical structure (a trading range, shakeout, or breakout) that the Wyckoff method treats as a key moment where big money is building or unwinding a position.
Why it matters: May provide an additional indication of trading structure, but is not proof of future direction.
What this means now: The stock moved a lot more (or less) today than the average of other stocks in its sector — it stands out relative to its peers.
Why it matters: A move that meaningfully outpaces its sector suggests something company-specific, not just a sector-wide trend.
📊 Historically, this signal type
This is not a prediction and not investment advice — just a plain-language read of real, already-computed signals. Full details: Stock Detective →
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
The provided sources do not mention OceanPal Inc. directly, so there is no available recent media coverage to summarize. The headlines focus on other industrial stocks experiencing significant price movements, such as INLIF, SVRN, and Volato Group, but no details about OceanPal Inc. are included.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about OceanPal Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 14 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
82
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Investors appear highly excited (82), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (50).
Psychology
91
Fundamentals
—
Technical
77
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+503%
Market Narrative
88
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+38
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SVRN is overwhelmingly consistent with euphoric overconfidence, where extreme momentum, overbought conditions, and perfect sentiment dominate. The narrative-reality gap (38) further suggests traders are detached from fundamental anchoring, focusing instead on short-term gains. The presence of panic-selling evidence (high volatility) hints at latent risk, but it’s overshadowed by FOMO-driven euphoria. The key open question is whether this detachment from peer performance (-25.8% vs. +5.1%) signals isolated euphoria or an impending correction as traders reassess relative valuation.
Updated: 10/01/2026, 04:54 AM
What could change this?
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SVRN reflects a clash between momentum-driven and fundamental approaches. Jesse Livermore and Thorstein Veblen’s high scores (88 and 80) suggest the stock exhibits strong price momentum and growth aligned with real value—principles favoring technical trends and qualitative expansion. In contrast, most value-oriented methodologies (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot) score 50 or lower due to insufficient data, signaling they lack the concrete balance-sheet or growth metrics to justify a buy. Meanwhile, risk-averse investors like Howard Marks, Gerald Loeb, and Samuel Nelson flag red flags—whether overvaluation, late-cycle risks, or stretched cycles—while Charles Mackay and Morgan Housel warn of speculative crowd behavior or volatility that could deter patient investors. The split underscores whether SVRN’s appeal lies in its price action or whether its fundamentals remain opaque or overpriced.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 88
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 59
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 29
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 23
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 16
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 12
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 5
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.8.2022 | $10,000.000 |
| 13.6.2022 | $10,000.000 |
| 31.3.2022 | $50,000.000 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 14 articles.
ChartMill · 30.9.2026
Benzinga · 29.9.2026
Benzinga · 29.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.9.2026
MT Newswires · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
PR Newswire · 3.8.2026
PR Newswire · 18.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for OceanPal Inc. (SVRN) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SVRN specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SVRN's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 14.9% of price; Calmar: -0.68 (3y annualized return -67.3% / max drawdown 99.7%); Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — SVRN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 12 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veraros Nikolaos | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 397 | -397 | — |
| Chrysochoidis Alexios | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 383 | -383 | — |
| Papatrifon Eleftherios | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 2,084 | -2,084 | — |
| Papatrifon Eleftherios | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -2,084 | — |
| Chrysochoidis Alexios | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -383 | — |
| Veraros Nikolaos | Disposition to the Company | 31.7.2026 | 0 | -397 | — |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 17.4.2026 | 500 | +500 | $10.35 |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 17.4.2026 | 1,500 | +500 | $10.35 |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 16.4.2026 | 500 | +500 | $10.78 |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 16.4.2026 | 1,000 | +500 | $10.78 |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 13.4.2026 | 500 | +500 | $10.88 |
| Ternullo Salvatore J. | Open Market Purchase | 13.4.2026 | 500 | +500 | $10.88 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,251 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 4,028 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology