Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$87.16
▼ $0.69 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$86.21 - $88.78
52-Week Range
$48.93 - $90.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.10.2026
Support
$73.55
Resistance
$90.06
STNG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+46.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.19
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$19.25 vs. price $87.16 (-122.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
47
Value
43
Momentum
94
Risk
54
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
78
Institutional
29
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Scorpio Tankers Inc.** has focused on its financial strength and strategic charter agreements. The company has secured long-term time charter deals for three product tankers, including three-year charters for LR2 vessels at high daily rates ($40,188–$42,500), while analysts highlight its **decent valuation, profitability, and cash-generating capabilities**. Discussions also mention its participation in maritime industry events, though no major operational or geopolitical shifts are explicitly detailed. Overall, the focus remains on its **stable financials and contractual stability** amid market volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Scorpio Tankers Inc. Common. News trend score: 68. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
45
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
21
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
78
Technical
94
Valuation
43
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
21
Narrative Gap
+41
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the stock’s proximity to resistance, ignoring divergent fundamentals. Confirmation bias further amplifies this, as investors prioritize narrative over deteriorating revenue and margins. Overconfidence in momentum over fundamentals hints at selective optimism, while FOMO remains secondary due to neutral RSI. The key question: will traders break resistance or double down on anchoring despite weakening fundamentals?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:15 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Scorpio Tankers Inc. announced updates on its third quarter of 2026 average daily Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rates and that it has entered into agreements to time charter-out three product tankers."
"Scorpio Tankers (STNG) offers decent value: low valuation, high profitability, healthy balance sheet."
"Scorpio Tankers (STNG) stock screen: Stage 2 uptrend, accelerating EPS/revenue, strong relative strength, and high-growth momentum setup."
"Iran Just Raised the Stakes in the Gulf—These 5 Stocks Stand to Benefit"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between traditional value investors and more skeptical or cyclical-minded strategists. Walter Bagehot and Benjamin Graham (both in his defensive and enterprising forms) see strong fundamentals—particularly liquidity and undervaluation—making it a compelling hold, especially for those prioritizing capital preservation or margin-of-safety principles. Meanwhile, methodologies rooted in market efficiency (Malkiel/Bogle) or speculative caution (Schwager, Lynch) dismiss it outright, arguing the stock lacks the clear edge or contrarian setup to justify active selection. Even growth-focused thinkers like Fisher or Veblen reject it, either because it fails to exhibit Fisher’s signature quality or because Veblen’s critique flags it as a speculative bubble. The middle ground—seen in Loeb, Housel, and Marks—acknowledges some merits but warns of overvaluation or cyclical risks, illustrating how the same data can be interpreted as either a defensive anchor or a speculative trap depending on the framework.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 91
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 72
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 64
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 27
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 22
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
69.3%
Operating Margin
37.2%
Net Margin
36.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.8%
ROA
8.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.40
Cash
$751.96M
Total Debt
$619.20M
Current Ratio
9.33
Debt/Equity
0.19
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.450 |
| 29.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 28.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.400 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.400 |
| 22.11.2024 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$87.16
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$19.25
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-122.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-77.31M | $-70.92M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-74.89M | $-63.03M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-73.95M | $-57.11M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-74.42M | $-52.72M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-76.28M | $-49.57M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-81.37M
Terminal Value
$-1.20B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-781.75M
Enterprise Value
$-1.08B
Net Debt
$-132.75M
Equity Value
$-942.35M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$61.80
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$40.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Scorpio Tankers Inc. Common (STNG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
STNG currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, STNG's estimated fair value is -$19.25, which is 122.1% below the current price of $87.16. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
STNG's technical score is 94/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.19; Current ratio: 9.33; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$19.25 vs. price $87.16 (-122.1%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 18.9% / max drawdown 61.9%).
Yes — STNG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 17 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camerana Niccolo | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $191,325.00 |
| Camerana Niccolo | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 15,834 | -2,500 | $191,325.00 |
| Okland Marianne | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $1,230,435.00 |
| Lauro Emanuele | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 234,637 | +234,637 | $5.87 |
| Okland Marianne | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 62,668 | -15,000 | $1,230,435.00 |
| Lauro Emanuele | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 234,637 | +234,637 | $5.87 |
| Kumar Sujata Parekh | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Henriksen Berit Ledel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Camerana Niccolo | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Kumar Sujata Parekh | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Okland Marianne | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Kumar Sujata Parekh | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 18,334 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Henriksen Berit Ledel | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 15,400 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Okland Marianne | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 77,668 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Camerana Niccolo | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 18,334 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Kumar Sujata Parekh | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 25,000 | +7,500 | $626,025.00 |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2015 | 6,000,000 | -6,000,000 | $15.34 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,102,583 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,042,701 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology