Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$185.00
▲ $6.81 (+3.8%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:58 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$17.23B
Day Range
$179.10 - $185.46
52-Week Range
$57.50 - $185.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$103.10
Resistance
$185.46
SMTC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+202.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 79.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $34.16 vs. price $185.00 (-81.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $147.89
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 33 to 62 day-over-day
What happened after
16d ago · $147.89
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 56)
What happened after
16d ago · $147.89
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 24 to 57 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
88
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Semtech Corporation (SMTC) highlights its strong financial performance and market momentum, particularly in September 2026. The company has been praised for passing growth screens like Mark Minervini’s Trend Template, driven by accelerating earnings, revenue growth, and demand in data centers and connectivity. Headlines also note record Q2 revenue (~$342M) and net income (~$160M), alongside upward guidance for Q3, though valuation concerns persist due to its high share price and potential market volatility. Analysts debate whether Semtech’s recent gains reflect justified optimism or overvaluation.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Semtech Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
78
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Investors appear highly excited (78), but evidence of strong fundamental conviction is comparatively weak (36).
Psychology
99
Fundamentals
35
Technical
88
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+17%
Market Narrative
100
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+64
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SMTC’s psychology suggests traders are fixated on recent gains (+18% ROC) and extreme bullish sentiment (100/100), blending FOMO and overconfidence. The 333% DCF premium and detached momentum from EPS growth (+0.8%) imply detached valuation optimism. A key question: will traders acknowledge the widening narrative gap (62 points) or persist in ignoring fundamentals? The dominant overconfidence may persist unless price momentum stalls or sentiment shifts.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"record second quarter revenue of about US$342 million and a move to net income of US$160.1 million"
"AI-driven demand, record backlogs and data center growth are powering Semtech"
"Semtech stock has delivered a very large 3 year gain... currently place it in the more expensive camp"
"Semtech (SMTC) passes Mark Minervini's Trend Template and High Growth Momentum screen"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent scores reflect a stark contrast between methodologies that tolerate moderate growth and those that prioritize valuation discipline or market timing. Peter Lynch’s mixed but higher score suggests he’d see potential in the stock’s growth, even if the price already reflects much of it, while the efficient-market camp (Malkiel/Bogle) and Fisher’s approach both flag it as unexceptional—implying the stock lacks the edge to justify active picking over passive strategies or Fisher’s legendary quality standards. On the other end, Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Marks’ risk-averse cycle analysis paint a far bleaker picture, dismissing it as overvalued or late-cycle, while Schwager’s quantitative wizards and Nelson’s cycle-based model treat it as outright overbought. The divide underscores whether the stock’s growth is worth the risk or if its valuation and market positioning make it a speculative gamble rather than a disciplined hold.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 67
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 67
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 52
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 41
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 40
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 19
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 17
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 7
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
51.6%
Operating Margin
3.1%
Net Margin
-3.8%
EBITDA Margin
3.1%
ROE
-7.3%
ROA
-2.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.46
Cash
$195.18M
Total Debt
$491.23M
Current Ratio
2.37
Debt/Equity
0.89
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$185.00
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$34.16
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-81.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.7% | $191.36M | $175.56M |
| 2 | 9.4% | $209.29M | $176.16M |
| 3 | 7.1% | $224.11M | $173.05M |
| 4 | 4.8% | $234.84M | $166.37M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $240.71M | $156.44M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$171.38M
Terminal Value
$3.80B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.47B
Enterprise Value
$3.31B
Net Debt
$296.06M
Equity Value
$3.02B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Semtech Corporation (SMTC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SMTC currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SMTC's estimated fair value is $34.16, which is 81.5% below the current price of $185.00. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SMTC's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 79.6%; Free cash flow growth: 241.9%; Net income growth: 75.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $34.16 vs. price $185.00 (-81.5%); Net margin: -3.8% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SMTC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU HONG Q | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $138.71 |
| Ruehl Julie Garcia | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $145.00 |
| Walsh Paul V Jr | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $135.48 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $150.00 |
| HOU HONG Q | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 62,799 | -2,000 | $140.00 |
| HOU HONG Q | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $140.00 |
| Walsh Paul V Jr | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 500 | -500 | $133.07 |
| Walsh Paul V Jr | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 27,600 | -500 | $133.07 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $145.04 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 93,862 | -3,000 | $145.04 |
| HOU HONG Q | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $133.00 |
| HOU HONG Q | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 64,799 | -2,000 | $133.00 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 3,354 | -3,354 | $129.94 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 1,400 | -1,400 | $128.70 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 437 | -437 | $124.19 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 588 | -588 | $127.61 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 273 | -273 | $126.60 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 2,448 | -2,448 | $125.18 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 104,925 | -437 | $124.19 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 102,477 | -2,448 | $125.18 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 102,204 | -273 | $126.60 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 101,616 | -588 | $127.61 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 100,216 | -1,400 | $128.70 |
| Silberstein Asaf | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 96,862 | -3,354 | $129.94 |
| Green Jason Elliot | Open Market Sale | 7.7.2026 | 1,132 | -1,132 | $130.48 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,556,860 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,309,139 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology