Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$0.43
▲ $0.03 (+7.7%)
Market data updated: 09/29 07:18 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$76.10M
Day Range
$0.38 - $0.44
52-Week Range
$0.38 - $2.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$0.38
Resistance
$0.89
-78.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $1.35 vs. price $0.43 (+213.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
42
Value
67
Momentum
18
Risk
40
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
50
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of SelectQuote, Inc. has centered on its Q4 2026 earnings, highlighting a 6% revenue rise to $1.62 billion, a $44 million increase in operating cash flow, but a $16.8 million net loss. Management emphasized cash‑flow generation over growth, while Healthcare Services revenue jumped 14% despite pricing pressure. Analysts cut the price target by roughly 24%, reflecting concerns over the shrinking top line.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SelectQuote, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
63
Fundamentals
50
Technical
18
Valuation
67
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-49%
Market Narrative
30
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
-6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests investors are heavily anchored to recent losses, with an 86% loss aversion score reflecting a 39% decline over three months. The subdued volume (0.86x average) and lack of FOMO or euphoria signals reinforce caution. The narrative gap (-16) hints at a disconnect between perceived and actual fundamentals, but the key question remains: will traders exit further or hold for recovery? The absence of panic selling (score 41) implies no extreme liquidation pressure, yet the stock remains detached from peers and fair value metrics.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:10 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Q4 Revenue Miss and Weak Fiscal 2027 Outlook""
""Cash Flow Pitch Comes With A Shrinking Top Line""
""Price Target Decreased by 24.49% to 2.36""
""notable price gaps in today's session""
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between methodologies that prioritize macroeconomic positioning and those that demand fundamental or behavioral rigor. The highest-scoring approaches—from Mackay’s crowd psychology, Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework, and Marks’ cycle analysis—all suggest it fits a favorable market environment, either by avoiding mania, offering deep valuation, or aligning with early-to-mid cycle dynamics. Meanwhile, the mid-tier scores (Nelson, Schwager, Veblen) still find merit in its cyclical or risk-reward profile, though with slightly more caution. The sharp drop-off among the lowest scorers—especially Fisher, Loeb, and Livermore—hints at a stock that either lacks Fisher’s signature growth quality, violates Livermore’s trend-following discipline, or carries volatility or stability risks that Smith or Loeb would reject outright. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in its macro or cyclical context (backed by Graham, Marks, or Nelson) or if it fails the granular, long-term filters of stability, quality, or behavioral discipline.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 87
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 83
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 74
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 43
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
54.9%
Operating Margin
4.6%
Net Margin
3.8%
EBITDA Margin
5.6%
ROE
17.7%
ROA
4.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.06
Cash
$16.03M
Total Debt
$370.17M
Current Ratio
1.82
Debt/Equity
1.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$0.43
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$1.35
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+213.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
17.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.8% | $32.52M | $29.83M |
| 2 | 14.0% | $37.05M | $31.19M |
| 3 | 10.1% | $40.81M | $31.51M |
| 4 | 6.3% | $43.39M | $30.74M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $44.47M | $28.90M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$27.61M
Terminal Value
$701.29M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$455.79M
Enterprise Value
$607.96M
Net Debt
$354.14M
Equity Value
$253.83M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.87
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.71
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Motley Fool · 1.9.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Moby · 26.8.2026
ChartMill · 25.8.2026
ChartMill · 25.8.2026
ChartMill · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 25.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
ChartMill · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Associated Press · 25.8.2026
Business Wire · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SLQT currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SLQT's estimated fair value is $1.35, which is 213.0% above the current price of $0.43. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SLQT's technical score is 18/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $1.35 vs. price $0.43 (+213.0%); Free cash flow growth: 299.2%; Net income growth: 30.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 9.9% of price; Calmar: -0.31 (3y annualized return -28.6% / max drawdown 93.4%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SLQT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 218,750 | +218,750 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 88,889 | -88,889 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 218,750 | +218,750 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 56,666 | -56,666 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 15,087 | +15,087 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 15,087 | -15,087 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 11,111 | -11,111 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 11,111 | +11,111 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 91,909 | -91,909 | $0.75 |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 45,261 | -45,261 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 56,666 | +56,666 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 45,261 | +45,261 | — |
| Boulware Daniel Allen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 88,889 | +88,889 | — |
| Grant William Thomas III | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | — |
| Grant William Thomas III | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 31,944 | -31,944 | — |
| Grant William Thomas III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 35,499 | +35,499 | — |
| Grant William Thomas III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 133,333 | -133,333 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 160,000 | -160,000 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 122,470 | -122,470 | — |
| Grant William Thomas III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 222,223 | +222,223 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 31,944 | +31,944 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.8.2026 | 195,438 | -195,438 | $0.75 |
| Grant William Thomas III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 27,777 | -27,777 | — |
| Grant Robert Clay | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.8.2026 | 255,557 | -255,557 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,660,548 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,243,525 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology