Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$662.27
▲ $19.03 (+3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/25 08:14 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$19.92B
Day Range
$638.63 - $669.86
52-Week Range
$243.68 - $901.81
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$459.01
Resistance
$762.65
SITM is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+100.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 61.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $30.85 vs. price $662.27 (-95.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
80
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
35
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SiTime Corporation has primarily focused on its stock performance and market positioning amid broader AI-driven industry trends. The company’s shares have declined by 16.4% since its last earnings report, prompting speculation about future stock movements. SiTime is also highlighted as part of a group of AI-related stocks with strong momentum, including NVIDIA and Semtech, ahead of its upcoming presentation at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference. Additionally, its five-year investment performance is noted as outperforming the market.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SiTime Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
42
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
35
Technical
80
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
84
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+46
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score 45) reflects a disconnect between detached valuation (+1884% DCF premium) and weak price momentum, consistent with investors ignoring fundamentals. Euphoria (score 35) further suggests valuation euphoria despite neutral technical signals. The extreme narrative gap (37) implies investors are prioritizing sentiment over reality. The key question: will traders eventually reconcile price with fundamentals, or will overconfidence persist despite weak momentum?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:03 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"NVIDIA, Super Micro Computer, Semtech, SiTime and Keysight ride AI demand, with rising estimates and momentum supporting September prospects."
"SiTime (NASDAQ:SITM) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 9.27% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 20.63%."
"SiTime management is scheduled to host a fireside chat at the Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference."
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score of 100 signaling it as a resilient liquidity play—ideal for weathering financial stress—while Peter Lynch’s 81 suggests it’s a growth stock undervalued relative to its potential. In contrast, the majority of investors cluster around mid-range caution, like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (63) and Philip Fisher (60), viewing it as solid but not exceptional or unambiguously compelling. At the other end, methodologies like Jesse Livermore (29) and Jack Schwager (17) outright reject it, flagging negative trends or a lack of disciplined setup, while Graham’s defensive (25) and enterprising (44) approaches both dismiss it as either too risky or not cheap enough. The split reflects a tension between liquidity-focused stability, growth optimism, and widespread skepticism about valuation or market timing.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 60
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 60
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 43
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 35
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 26
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 26
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
53.6%
Operating Margin
-20.5%
Net Margin
-13.1%
EBITDA Margin
-8.2%
ROE
-3.7%
ROA
-3.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.72
Cash
$16.76M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
11.30
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$662.27
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$30.85
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-95.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
17.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.6% | $41.30M | $37.89M |
| 2 | 13.8% | $46.99M | $39.55M |
| 3 | 10.0% | $51.71M | $39.93M |
| 4 | 6.3% | $54.95M | $38.93M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $56.32M | $36.61M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$35.13M
Terminal Value
$888.19M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$577.26M
Enterprise Value
$770.17M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$770.17M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$46.31
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$36.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SiTime Corporation (SITM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SITM currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SITM's estimated fair value is $30.85, which is 95.3% below the current price of $662.27. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SITM's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 61.2%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.5%; Free cash flow growth: 369.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $30.85 vs. price $662.27 (-95.3%); Operating margin: -20.5% (negative); Net margin: -13.1% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SITM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pangrazio Vincent P | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 44,997 | -3,000 | $625.00 |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Open Market Sale | 9.9.2026 | 345,544 | -12,000 | $603.47 |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 9.9.2026 | 26,459 | +0 | — |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 357,544 | -1,300 | — |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 26,459 | +650 | — |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 650 | +650 | — |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 650 | +650 | — |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Gift | 31.8.2026 | 1,300 | -1,300 | — |
| Howe Elizabeth A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 65,148 | -2,740 | $598.81 |
| Ahamad Samsheer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 29,689 | -1,484 | $598.81 |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 358,844 | -29,054 | $598.81 |
| Sevalia Piyush B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 68,501 | -9,701 | $598.81 |
| Bonnot Lionel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 61,667 | -9,630 | $598.81 |
| Pangrazio Vincent P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 47,997 | -5,419 | $598.81 |
| Assaderaghi Fariborz | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 68,235 | -9,701 | $598.81 |
| Assaderaghi Fariborz | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 9,701 | -9,701 | $598.81 |
| VASHIST RAJESH | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 29,054 | -29,054 | $598.81 |
| Ahamad Samsheer | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 1,484 | -1,484 | $598.81 |
| Bonnot Lionel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 9,630 | -9,630 | $598.81 |
| Pangrazio Vincent P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 5,419 | -5,419 | $598.81 |
| Sevalia Piyush B | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 9,701 | -9,701 | $598.81 |
| Howe Elizabeth A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 2,740 | -2,740 | $598.81 |
| Kreindl Torsten | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 11,786 | -345 | $750.12 |
| Frank Edward H. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 10,999 | -1,000 | $745.00 |
| Frank Edward H. | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $745.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,210,209 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 982,102 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology