Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$100.50
▲ $0.38 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/25 10:38 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$3.85B
Day Range
$99.68 - $103.24
52-Week Range
$71.62 - $110.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
Support
$79.01
Resistance
$104.75
SIG is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+3.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $168.95 vs. price $100.50 (+68.1%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/18/202671
This Week
72
7D Ago
→ -1
Stable
Technical
87
7D Ago: 92
↓ -5
Fundamental
52
7D Ago: 52
→ 0
Growth
73
7D Ago: 73
→ 0
Valuation
67
7D Ago: 67
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
58
7D Ago: 58
→ 0
Risk
40
7D Ago: 40
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
11d ago · $100.26
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 12 to 79 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
71 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 11, 2026
Then
73
$97.71
Now
71
$100.50
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
58
Value
67
Momentum
87
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
52
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) has centered on its upcoming Q2 2026 earnings report, with analysts closely examining performance metrics beyond just revenue and earnings per share. The stock has faced modest declines in recent trading, drawing investor attention amid broader market pressures. Analysts also highlight SIG as part of consumer recovery discussions, alongside pet retail and footwear sectors, though its turnaround prospects remain cautiously evaluated.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Signet Jewelers Limited Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
46
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
52
Technical
87
Valuation
67
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+15%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+34
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 2.9% support level, consistent with anchoring bias. Positive sentiment (98/100) and modest momentum (+0.5% ROC) coexist with valuation disconnect (-51% vs. DCF), indicating selective focus on recent price action. The narrative gap (10-point divergence) hints at potential misalignment between perceived and actual fundamentals. Key question: Will traders break the anchoring level, or will sentiment sustain the current range-bound behavior?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:04 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Exploring Analyst Estimates for Signet (SIG) Q2 Earnings, Beyond Revenue and EPS"
"Signet (SIG) closed at $81.26... marking a -1.24% move from the prior day"
"Wall Street analysts are raising flags and price targets on... Signet Jewelers... turnaround stories"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 19/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s documented principles, the model estimates the stock sits near an oversold point in its cycle, while Jack Schwager’s disciplined reward‑to‑risk framework and Peter Lynch’s growth‑oriented criteria also assign high scores, suggesting a broadly favorable view. The more cautious valuations from Benjamin Graham (defensive), Thorstein Veblen, and Howard Marks reflect concerns about price versus intrinsic value and risk pricing, resulting in moderate scores that still acknowledge attractiveness but with qualifiers. In contrast, the efficient‑market stance of Burton Malkiel & John Bogle and the enterprising Graham filter highlight the lack of a compelling edge over an index, yielding middling scores. Finally, the low scores from Philip Fisher, Gerald Loeb, and Walter Bagehot stem from documented worries about quality, capital risk, and liquidity, illustrating how their distinct focus areas lead to a markedly more skeptical conclusion.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 80
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 78
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 75
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 68
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 61
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 47
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 38
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 19
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 19
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
39.5%
Operating Margin
5.8%
Net Margin
4.3%
EBITDA Margin
7.9%
ROE
15.0%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.13
Cash
$874.80M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.60
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.7.2026 | $0.350 |
| 23.7.2026 | $0.350 |
| 24.4.2026 | $0.350 |
| 23.4.2026 | $0.350 |
| 25.7.2025 | $0.320 |
| 24.7.2025 | $0.320 |
| 25.4.2025 | $0.320 |
| 24.4.2025 | $0.320 |
| 24.1.2025 | $0.290 |
| 23.1.2025 | $0.290 |
| 25.10.2024 | $0.290 |
| 24.10.2024 | $0.290 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$100.50
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$168.95
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+68.1%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.5% | $501.78M | $460.34M |
| 2 | -2.7% | $488.06M | $410.79M |
| 3 | -1.0% | $483.23M | $373.14M |
| 4 | 0.8% | $486.88M | $344.92M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $499.05M | $324.35M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$525.30M
Terminal Value
$7.87B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.11B
Enterprise Value
$7.03B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$7.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$47.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$30.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Zacks · 23.9.2026
Zacks · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Fintel · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Signet Jewelers Limited Common (SIG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 71/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SIG currently scores 71/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SIG's estimated fair value is $168.95, which is 68.1% above the current price of $100.50. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SIG's technical score is 87/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $168.95 vs. price $100.50 (+68.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 974.1%; Net income growth: 381.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.1% of price; Calmar: 0.21 (3y annualized return 11.9% / max drawdown 57.6%); Operating margin: 5.8% — weak.
Yes — SIG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cygielman Jamie | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.8.2026 | 6,436 | +6,436 | — |
| Yoakum Julie | Tax Withholding in Shares | 31.8.2026 | 2,645.98 | -2,645.98 | $82.36 |
| Yoakum Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 12,245 | +52 | — |
| Hilson Joan M | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 258,950 | +318 | — |
| McCluskey Helen | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 39,397 | +16 | — |
| MCCOLLAM SHARON | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 32,746 | +9 | — |
| COCHRAN SANDRA B | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 6,178 | +9 | — |
| Gennette Jeffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 2,341 | +10 | — |
| Ciccolini Vincent | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 45,257 | +21 | — |
| Sagi Raghunandan R | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 11,082 | +47 | — |
| Ulasewicz Eugenia | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 26,823 | +9 | — |
| Symancyk James Kevin | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 149,543 | +384 | — |
| Wilson Donta L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 13,586 | +9 | — |
| Graf R. Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 33,650 | +9 | — |
| Cho Karen Leslie | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 8,487 | +31 | — |
| Ptak Stash | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 23,968 | +25 | — |
| Tilzer Brian A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 14,627 | +9 | — |
| Hicks Zackery A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 20,473 | +9 | — |
| Cividino Claudia | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 17,114 | +35 | — |
| Ciccolini Vincent | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 21.11 | +21.11 | — |
| COCHRAN SANDRA B | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 8.67 | +8.67 | — |
| Wilson Donta L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 8.67 | +8.67 | — |
| Cho Karen Leslie | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 31.27 | +31.27 | — |
| Tilzer Brian A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 8.67 | +8.67 | — |
| Graf R. Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.8.2026 | 8.67 | +8.67 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,825,908 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,038,500 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology