Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$22.30
▼ $0.50 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/29 05:25 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$744.20M
Day Range
$22.22 - $22.84
52-Week Range
$14.93 - $24.89
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$21.91
Resistance
$24.89
+34.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $41.85 vs. price $22.30 (+87.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): -0.3%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
67
Momentum
22
Risk
64
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
60
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Shore Bancshares, Inc. has centered on its strong investor momentum, with frequent mentions of its stock performance reaching 52-week highs and being highlighted as a top momentum pick. Analysts have raised price targets—from $22 to $25 (Keefe, Bruyette & Woods) and $24 to $26.5 (Piper Sandler)—while praising its low loan-to-value (LTV) ratio in commercial real estate (CRE) lending. The company’s quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share was also noted, reinforcing its appeal to income-focused investors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Shore Bancshares, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 6 of the last 18 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
23
Fundamentals
60
Technical
22
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
31
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here strongly suggests herding, as SHBI’s decline (-1.9%) mirrors its peers (-2.0%) without extreme volatility or sentiment extremes. Low FOMO/Panic scores (2-3) indicate no panic or urgency, while neutral RSI and volume imply a passive, synchronized move. The narrative gap (-5) hints at slight underestimation of reality, but no clear bias dominates beyond the herd’s momentum. The key question: *Is this alignment structural (sector-wide) or tactical (short-term positioning)?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:27 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Keefe, Bruyette & Woods raises price target from $22 to $25"
"Shore Bancshares beats Q2 earnings and revenue estimates"
"Shore Bancshares is a great momentum stock choice"
"Piper Sandler maintains Overweight rating on Shore Bancshares"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 51/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with scores ranging from a decisive 100 (Bagehot’s inability to assess balance sheets) down to a neutral 48 (Graham’s enterprising investor bar). The most bullish signals—like Lynch’s 82 and Veblen’s 80—highlight growth potential and undervaluation, while the most cautious (e.g., Nelson’s 50 and Schwager’s 59) flag ambiguity or mid-cycle risks. Defensive investors like Graham (90) and Housel (86) see it as a patient-friendly hold, contrasting with Marks’ cycle-neutral 56, which suggests neither a peak nor a trough. Even the efficient-market camp (69) justifies deviation, while Fisher’s 64 hints at solid but not exceptional quality—showing how the same stock can be a ‘quiet compounder’ to one and a ‘no clear edge’ to another.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 92
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 89
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 89
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 82
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 76
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟢 73
A real, well-supported case — deviating from a broad index may be justified here
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 51
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
285.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.1%
ROA
1.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.78
Cash
$355.57M
Total Debt
$89.06M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.15
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.9.2026 | $0.140 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.140 |
| 2.6.2026 | $0.140 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.120 |
| 3.3.2026 | $0.120 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.120 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.120 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.120 |
| 10.8.2025 | $0.120 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.120 |
| 11.5.2025 | $0.120 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$41.85
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+87.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
11.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.1% | $65.80M | $60.36M |
| 2 | 8.9% | $71.68M | $60.33M |
| 3 | 6.8% | $76.56M | $59.12M |
| 4 | 4.6% | $80.12M | $56.76M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $82.12M | $53.37M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$59.22M
Terminal Value
$1.29B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$841.65M
Enterprise Value
$1.13B
Net Debt
$-266.50M
Equity Value
$1.40B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.66
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.87
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 7 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 18 articles.
PR Newswire · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
Benzinga · 28.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
MT Newswires · 23.7.2026
Associated Press · 23.7.2026
PR Newswire · 23.7.2026
ChartMill · 23.7.2026
Benzinga · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 20.7.2026
Zacks · 29.6.2026
Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SHBI currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SHBI's estimated fair value is $41.85, which is 87.7% above the current price of $22.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SHBI's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $41.85 vs. price $22.30 (+87.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 34.8%; Free cash flow growth: 42.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): -0.3%; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — SHBI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cullum Charles S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 3,796 | -533 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 27,934 | -1,581 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 2,441 | -1,251 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 10,321 | -3,692 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 3,692 | +3,692 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 4,329 | +1,581 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 3,692 | -3,692 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 3,692 | +3,692 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 1,581 | -1,581 | — |
| Stayton Noah Edward | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 1,251 | -1,251 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 1,581 | +1,581 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 21.8.2026 | 533 | -533 | — |
| LAMON JOHN | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 300 | +300 | $24.57 |
| LAMON JOHN | Open Market Purchase | 3.8.2026 | 65,122 | +300 | $24.57 |
| McDonald Rebecca Middleton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | -2,310 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.7.2026 | 1,413 | -1,413 | — |
| Adams Michael Brian | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | +2,310 | — |
| McDonald Rebecca Middleton | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | +2,310 | — |
| LAMON JOHN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | +2,310 | — |
| Cullum Charles S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 4,161 | +4,161 | — |
| WAYSON KONRAD | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | -2,310 | — |
| Sanders Edward Lawrence III | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | -2,310 | — |
| Jones David S. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | -2,310 | — |
| CLEMMER R. MICHAEL | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | +2,310 | — |
| HYATT ALAN J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.7.2026 | 2,310 | -2,310 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,020,738 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 932,608 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology