Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$9.09
▲ $0.01 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/29 03:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$5.08B
Day Range
$9.02 - $9.18
52-Week Range
$8.43 - $12.15
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$8.95
Resistance
$10.47
RITM is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-21.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net margin
Net margin: 15.2% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.8% / max drawdown 30.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
60
Momentum
9
Risk
36
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
47
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) has primarily focused on its high dividend yield (10%), positioning it as an attractive option for income-focused investors in a high-interest-rate environment. Analysts highlight its strong earnings coverage of the dividend and compare it favorably to other mortgage REITs, emphasizing its stability relative to riskier peers like Dynex or Armour Residential. The stock’s modest post-earnings rally (0.9% gain) and inclusion in high-yield stock lists also reflect investor interest in its yield-driven appeal.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Rithm Capital Corp.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
47
Technical
9
Valuation
60
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
RITM’s psychology is dominated by herding, where traders align with relative strength (+0.3% vs. peers) despite muted momentum (-2.9% ROC). Confirmation bias (narrative gap +17) and anchoring (3.9% below resistance) suggest selective attention to positive narratives while ignoring revenue weakness (-0.1%). Low panic (score 7) and neutral volatility (0.78x ATR) imply no extreme distress, but FOMO (score 14) hints at cautious momentum chasing. The key question: *Will herding sustain if peers rally further, or will anchoring break if resistance holds?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"RITM offers a 10% dividend yield, well-covered by earnings"
"Compare top mortgage REIT dividend picks: why Rithm Capital (RITM) and Annaly (NLY) look safer on coverage/value"
"Rithm (RITM) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock?"
"UBS analyst lowers price target from $14.5 to $14, maintains Buy rating"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Benjamin Graham’s approaches standing out as the most bullish. His *Enterprising Investor* model scores an 83, flagging it as a deep statistical discount—suggesting the stock’s valuation may be so attractive that it warrants aggressive leverage or margin. Even his *Defensive* framework (75) still deems it attractive, signaling strong intrinsic value. In contrast, cyclical and contrarian investors like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (71) see it as oversold, while crowd psychology analysts like Charles Mackay (65) detect early signs of speculative excitement. Meanwhile, trend-following and risk-averse methodologies—from Jesse Livermore (49) to Howard Marks (38)—caution against the stock, either due to unclear momentum or poor risk/valuation trade-offs. The sharp contrast between Graham’s valuation-driven optimism and the skepticism of volatility-focused or quality-driven investors (like Lynch at 0 or Fisher at 22) highlights a core tension: whether the stock’s cheapness or instability is the dominant factor.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 88
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 22
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$8.95
Range Bottom
$10.47
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
15.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.3%
ROA
1.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.05
Cash
$1.85B
Total Debt
$35.44B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
4.20
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.250 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.250 |
| 6.4.2026 | $0.250 |
| 5.4.2026 | $0.250 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.250 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.250 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.250 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.250 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.250 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.250 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.250 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$15.44
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.18
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 11 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RITM currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
RITM's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: 15.2% — strong; NAV per share: $14.18; P/E: 8.7.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.8% / max drawdown 30.5%); Revenue growth (last year): -6.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -37.7%.
Yes — RITM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hebard Peggy Hwan | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 14,520 | -14,520 | $10.18 |
| Hebard Peggy Hwan | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 82,259 | -14,520 | $10.18 |
| Rithm Capital Corp. | Other Transaction | 5.8.2026 | 137,383 | +137,383 | $11.73 |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 7,365 | +7,365 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 21,423 | +21,423 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 4,761 | +4,761 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 51,262 | +51,262 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,848 | +2,848 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,148 | +2,148 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 833 | +833 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 833 | +833 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,119 | +2,119 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 529 | +529 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 60,569 | +529 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 85,798 | +2,119 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 49,759 | +833 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 33,721 | +833 | — |
| SANTORO NICOLA JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 86,965 | +2,148 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 325,538 | +2,848 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 2,075,110 | +51,262 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 284,351 | +4,761 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 867,221 | +21,423 | — |
| Nierenberg Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.7.2026 | 298,167 | +7,365 | — |
| Kripalani Ranjit M | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.5.2026 | 16,739 | +16,739 | — |
| Le Melle Patrice M | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.5.2026 | 16,199 | +16,199 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
28,847,094 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 30,310,661 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
77.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 67.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology