Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$22.13
▲ $0.34 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/18 04:30 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$1.36B
Day Range
$21.80 - $22.23
52-Week Range
$17.72 - $25.97
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
AAT is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+4.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$1.57 vs. price $22.13 (-107.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
30
Risk
50
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
61
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **American Assets Trust, Inc.** has centered on **insider buying activity by founder and Executive Chairman Ernest Rady**, who has repeatedly purchased significant shares—totaling millions of dollars—over recent weeks. Rady’s aggressive stock accumulation, now representing **23% of the firm’s equity**, has been interpreted as a **bullish signal**, reinforcing confidence in the REIT’s premium property portfolio across office, retail, and residential sectors. Analysts also noted **Q2 earnings misses** but highlighted management’s **reaffirmed guidance** and expectations for stronger second-half performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about American Assets Trust, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
61
Technical
30
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+19
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **anchoring** behavior (score: 92) reflects traders fixating on the 0.4% proximity to support, likely ignoring broader negative momentum (-3.3% ROC) and oversold conditions (RSI 30). While **confirmation bias** (score: 23) persists due to a +18 narrative-reality gap, the lack of herding (score: 0) and muted volatility (0.79x ATR) suggests cautious, selective participation. The key question: *Will traders break free from the support anchor despite extreme sentiment (98/100) and weak momentum?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 07:05 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Executive Chairman Rady Buy $3.7 Million Shares in a Resoundingly Bullish Move"
"Rady's $2.3 million purchase brings his total beneficial ownership to $318.99 million"
"Rady's open-market purchase increases his indirect exposure to AAT's real estate portfolio spanning office, retail, and residential properties in high-barrier markets"
"management reaffirmed FFO guidance and expects stronger H2 results"
📈 18D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that investors focused on cyclical positioning and disciplined risk‑reward setups (Nelson, Schwager, Mackay, Veblen) view AAT quite positively, reflected in scores above 70. In contrast, those emphasizing broader market cycles, trend clarity, or capital preservation (Marks, Livermore, Loeb, Smith) assign more middling scores, suggesting a neutral or cautious stance. Value‑oriented and defensive frameworks such as Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot generate low scores, indicating the stock fails key criteria like defensive margins, quality growth signatures, or sufficient financial data. Overall, the divergence stems from each methodology’s weighting of cycle timing, risk appetite, and fundamental quality, leading to a spectrum from optimistic to skeptical assessments.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 55
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 19
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 2
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
61.1%
Operating Margin
33.5%
Net Margin
16.4%
EBITDA Margin
62.6%
ROE
6.2%
ROA
2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.92
Cash
$129.36M
Total Debt
$1.70B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.48
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.340 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.340 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.340 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.340 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.340 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.340 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.340 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.340 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.340 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.340 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.340 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.340 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.13
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$1.57
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-107.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1% | $95.95M | $88.02M |
| 2 | 1.5% | $97.37M | $81.95M |
| 3 | 1.8% | $99.14M | $76.56M |
| 4 | 2.2% | $101.29M | $71.75M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $103.82M | $67.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$94.86M
Terminal Value
$1.64B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.06B
Enterprise Value
$1.45B
Net Debt
$1.57B
Equity Value
$-120.83M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.00
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.86
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Motley Fool · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Motley Fool · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Motley Fool · 22.8.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Fintel · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.8.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
MarketBeat · 29.7.2026
American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AAT currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AAT's estimated fair value is -$1.57, which is 107.1% below the current price of $22.13. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AAT's technical score is 30/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.7% of price; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$1.57 vs. price $22.13 (-107.1%); Calmar: 0.06 (3y annualized return 2.2% / max drawdown 39.7%); Revenue growth (last year): -4.7%.
Yes — AAT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 25 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 2.9.2026 | 96,636 | +96,636 | $22.50 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 1.9.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.40 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 31.8.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $22.33 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 9,045,846 | +50,000 | $22.52 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.52 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 2,317,022 | +50,000 | $22.56 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.56 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.89 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 8,995,846 | +50,000 | $22.89 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 29,729 | +29,729 | $22.74 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 24.8.2026 | 8,945,846 | +29,729 | $22.74 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.75 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $22.77 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 3,586 | +3,586 | $22.69 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.55 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $22.79 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 8,802,531 | +50,000 | $22.79 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | $22.86 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 13.8.2026 | 8,752,531 | +100,000 | $22.86 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | $22.52 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 11.8.2026 | 8,652,531 | +100,000 | $22.52 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 93,243 | +93,243 | $22.45 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 10.8.2026 | 8,552,531 | +93,243 | $22.45 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 32,763 | +32,763 | $22.82 |
| RADY ERNEST S | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 8,459,288 | +32,763 | $22.82 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,645,526 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,123,516 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology