Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$4.36
▲ $0.03 (+0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/18 04:19 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$241.90M
Day Range
$4.36 - $4.41
52-Week Range
$4.14 - $5.89
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
ACRE is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-9.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/22 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 97.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -1.6% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
52
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
13
Risk
36
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
30
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE)** has centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings performance**, where the company **exceeded revenue and earnings estimates**, drawing positive attention. Analysts highlighted its financial resilience amid broader REIT sector challenges, including credit, legal, and refinancing pressures. Discussions also touched on portfolio diversification and strategic growth, though broader market trends—like Fed rate expectations—remain a backdrop. The focus remains on ACRE’s operational stability and investor appeal.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation. News trend score: 74. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
39
Fundamentals
30
Technical
13
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ACRE’s psychology is dominated by **loss aversion**, as the 8.5% three-month decline and muted volume suggest investors are hesitant to lock in losses or capitalize on underperformance. The **narrative gap** (+9) and **confirmation bias** (score 12) imply selective focus on positive narratives despite weak fundamentals, while **herding** (score 27) reflects relative underperformance versus peers. The absence of panic or euphoria signals a cautious, risk-averse stance. The key question: *Will the narrative gap widen further, or will reality-driven selling force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:46 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) **tops Q2 earnings and revenue estimates** (Zacks)"
"Earnings call highlights included **strategic portfolio management** and **optimization efforts** (GuruFocus)"
"ACRE’s earnings call **drew attention** as investors analyzed **portfolio performance and refinancing strategies** (SeekingAlpha #9, MarketBeat, Moby)"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep philosophical and methodological divides among the investors. Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* framework, though unable to fully evaluate it due to data gaps, would have been intrigued by its potential—while his classic *Defensive Investor* approach remains lukewarm, scoring just 57 and flagging inconsistencies. Meanwhile, cyclical thinkers like Samuel Armstrong Nelson (80) and Charles Mackay (91) see it as a cyclical opportunity or a non-manic buy, contrasting sharply with Howard Marks’ mid-cycle caution (59) and Gerald Smith’s skepticism (33) about its stability. On the other end, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot’s zero scores underscore a lack of growth or balance-sheet strength, while volatility-focused minds like Morgan Housel (24) and Jesse Livermore (11) warn of trend resistance or emotional traps. The divide between bullish cyclicalists and bearish trend-followers or quality purists highlights whether ACRE’s risks are worth the potential reward—or if it’s a speculative gamble rather than a disciplined bet.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 26
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid accumulation phase — a trading range after a decline with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$4.14
Range Bottom
$4.91
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-1.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-0.2%
ROA
-0.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$29.29M
Total Debt
$948.18M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.86
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.150 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.150 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.150 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.150 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.150 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$9.28
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 14 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Motley Fool · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.8.2026
Moby · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Associated Press · 4.8.2026
PR Newswire · 4.8.2026
ChartMill · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 30.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
PR Newswire · 21.7.2026
Yahoo · 21.7.2026
Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ACRE currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ACRE's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 97.4%; NAV per share: $9.28.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -1.6% (negative); Calmar: -0.37 (3y annualized return -25.2% / max drawdown 68.7%); Return on equity (ROE): -0.2% (negative).
Yes — ACRE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blakely Caroline | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| Parekh Rebecca Jaisali | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| SKINNER JAMES E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| Moriarty Edmond N. III | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| April Rand Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| Browning William | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| SKINNER JAMES E | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 116,217 | +18,879 | — |
| Parekh Rebecca Jaisali | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 77,258 | +18,879 | — |
| Moriarty Edmond N. III | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 98,905 | +18,879 | — |
| April Rand Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 18,879 | +18,879 | — |
| Blakely Caroline | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 50,495 | +18,879 | — |
| Browning William | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.4.2026 | 25,053 | +18,879 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 7,606 | -7,606 | $4.93 |
| Gonzales Jeffrey Michael | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 6,218 | -6,218 | $4.93 |
| Donohoe Bryan Patrick | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 21,761 | -21,761 | $4.93 |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 92,754 | -7,606 | $4.93 |
| Gonzales Jeffrey Michael | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 88,533 | -6,218 | $4.93 |
| Donohoe Bryan Patrick | Open Market Sale | 14.1.2026 | 250,197 | -21,761 | $4.93 |
| Donohoe Bryan Patrick | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 49,500 | +49,500 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 22,000 | +22,000 | — |
| Yoon Tae Sik | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 37,400 | +37,400 | — |
| Gonzales Jeffrey Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 44,000 | +44,000 | — |
| Yoon Tae Sik | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 289,153 | +37,400 | — |
| Donohoe Bryan Patrick | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 271,958 | +49,500 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 100,360 | +22,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,360,188 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,990,418 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology