Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$81.39
▲ $0.62 (+0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/30 01:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$15.07B
Day Range
$80.42 - $81.45
52-Week Range
$79.75 - $119.33
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$79.75
Resistance
$117.50
RBA is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-24.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.43
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
47
Value
45
Momentum
22
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
59
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of RB Global, Inc. has primarily focused on its subsidiary Ritchie Bros., which launched a redesigned mobile app to enhance buyer engagement and bidding capabilities, aiming to boost marketplace participation. Separately, RB Global’s Q2 financials showed 11% revenue growth but slower adjusted EBITDA gains (6%), reflecting challenges like lower take rates and acquisition-related pressures. The broader discussion often highlights RB Global as a cash-generating company, though some analyses question reinvestment efficiency. No direct RB Global news beyond these points was found.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about RB Global, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
59
Technical
22
Valuation
45
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-28%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Loss Aversion (63) suggests traders are hesitant to crystallize losses after a 20% drop, despite muted panic or FOMO signals. Anchoring (51) hints at proximity to support (2.4% above), possibly reinforcing reluctance to exit. The narrative gap (17) implies traders may overestimate recovery potential relative to fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders accept modest gains near support, or will the 20% decline deepen aversion further?*
Updated: 09/04/2026, 11:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Ritchie Bros. launched a redesigned mobile app to deepen buyer engagement and drive marketplace participation, transforming it into a fully native bidding experience."
"RB Global’s Q2 revenue grew 11%, but adjusted EBITDA rose only 6% due to lower take rates and acquisition mix pressuring operating leverage."
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. At the top end, Nelson and Mackay see it as a cyclical opportunity—either near oversold or free of crowd-driven euphoria—while Schwager and Marks (cycle) favor it for its disciplined setup or early-cycle positioning. Yet even among bullish-leaning investors, Marks (general) and Smith caution that the risk isn’t negligible or a long-term lock. The split between Livermore’s bearish trend rejection and Fisher/Lynch’s growth skepticism underscores whether the stock’s momentum aligns with core principles (trend-following vs. qualitative growth). Meanwhile, Graham’s dual verdicts—failing defensive metrics but barely missing the Enterprising Investor’s threshold—highlight a valuation gap: the stock may be too volatile for patient value investors but not cheap enough for aggressive ones.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 71
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 64
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 43
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 36
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 31
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 19
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 9
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.4%
Operating Margin
15.5%
Net Margin
9.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.1%
ROA
3.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.06
Cash
$531.50M
Total Debt
$2.33B
Current Ratio
1.10
Debt/Equity
0.43
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $0.330 |
| 27.5.2026 | $0.310 |
| 26.5.2026 | $0.310 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 28.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.290 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.290 |
| 27.11.2024 | $0.290 |
| 26.11.2024 | $0.290 |
| 28.8.2024 | $0.290 |
| 27.8.2024 | $0.290 |
| 29.5.2024 | $0.270 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$81.39
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$88.54
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+8.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $899.00M | $824.77M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $1.07B | $903.28M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $1.22B | $942.64M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $1.32B | $935.07M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.35B | $879.31M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$719.20M
Terminal Value
$21.33B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$13.87B
Enterprise Value
$18.35B
Net Debt
$1.80B
Equity Value
$16.55B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$32.56
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$19.31
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
StockStory · 24.9.2026
MT Newswires · 23.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 21.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 20.9.2026
Trefis · 18.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 18.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 15.9.2026
MT Newswires · 15.9.2026
Business Wire · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Business Wire · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
RB Global, Inc. (RBA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RBA currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, RBA's estimated fair value is $88.54, which is 8.8% above the current price of $81.39. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
RBA's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.43; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; Gross margin: 46.4% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.28 (3y annualized return 9.2% / max drawdown 32.4%); Free cash flow growth: -5.9%.
Yes — RBA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeWitt Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 34 | +34 | — |
| Sieger Michael D | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| DeWitt Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| Morrison Gregory B | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| Harford Chloe | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| Sieger Michael D | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 9 | +9 | — |
| Schmit Jennifer Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 4 | +4 | — |
| Schmit Jennifer Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 4 | +4 | — |
| Watt Darren Jeffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| Carlson Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 6 | +6 | — |
| Schmit Jennifer Laura | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 7 | +7 | — |
| Carlson Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Carlson Christopher | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 4 | +4 | — |
| Watt Darren Jeffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 5 | +5 | — |
| LEWIS MICHAEL THOMAS STEVEN | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 17 | +17 | — |
| Watt Darren Jeffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 3 | +3 | — |
| Stein Deborah | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 8 | +8 | — |
| Guerin Eric | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 25 | +25 | — |
| Guerin Eric | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 24 | +24 | — |
| O'Day Timothy J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 11 | +11 | — |
| Stein Deborah | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 11 | +11 | — |
| O'Day Timothy J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 9 | +9 | — |
| KESSLER JAMES FRANCIS | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 53 | +53 | — |
| Elton Robert George | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 10 | +10 | — |
| KESSLER JAMES FRANCIS | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.9.2026 | 186 | +186 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,043,053 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 14,742,025 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
75.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 82.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology