Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$23.63
▼ $0.64 (-2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/21 02:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$714.78M
Day Range
$23.54 - $24.23
52-Week Range
$14.25 - $25.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$22.00
Resistance
$24.66
PSTL is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+44.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 25.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
P/E
P/E: 50.3
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
68
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 19, 2026
Then
70
$23.63
Now
68
$23.63
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
82
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
53
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Postal Realty Trust, Inc.** (PSTL) has centered on its financial upgrades and growth strategies. The company achieved a **BBB investment-grade rating** from Fitch Ratings, signaling improved creditworthiness. Analysts like Scotiabank and JP Morgan raised their price targets, reflecting optimism about its **record acquisition targets** and lease renewal-driven expansion. Stock performance post-earnings reports and dividend updates also drew attention, highlighting its status as a stable real estate investment trust (REIT) in the U.S. postal sector.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Postal Realty Trust, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
27
Fundamentals
53
Technical
82
Valuation
45
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant *herding* bias, where traders align with peers despite PSTL’s slight underperformance. FOMO and euphoria coexist due to strong momentum, positive sentiment, and valuation premiums, while anchoring near resistance may reinforce caution. The narrative gap (27) hints at overoptimism, but the key question remains: *Will momentum sustain, or will traders pivot after peers recover?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 03:46 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Postal Realty Achieves BBB Investment Grade Rating from Fitch Ratings"
"Scotiabank analyst raises price target from $25 to $26"
"USPS-leased REIT with 99.8% occupancy, raised AFFO guidance"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for PSTL reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher’s high scores (88 and 78, respectively) suggest they see strong growth potential and exceptional fundamentals, with Lynch noting the price hasn’t yet reflected the company’s upside. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s near-zero score (0) and his Enterprising Investor variant’s outright rejection (18) highlight a stark contrast—Graham’s value-focused approach dismisses the stock as statistically overpriced even for risk-tolerant investors. The middle ground, where methodologies like Howard Marks (49) and Jesse Livermore (61) caution about inflated expectations or lack of clear trends, underscores the tension between growth optimism and cyclical or valuation concerns. Even Fisher’s high-quality nod contrasts sharply with Walter Bagehot’s (18) inability to assess it through traditional balance-sheet lenses, illustrating how sector-specific or data-dependent frameworks can clash entirely.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 78
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 54
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 49
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 18
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 18
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$22.00
Range Bottom
$24.66
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
35.8%
Net Margin
14.8%
EBITDA Margin
60.9%
ROE
5.0%
ROA
1.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.47
Cash
$1.45M
Total Debt
$361.14M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.27
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.245 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.245 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.245 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.245 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.245 |
| 4.11.2025 | $0.243 |
| 3.11.2025 | $0.243 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.243 |
| 30.7.2025 | $0.243 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.243 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.243 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.243 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$23.63
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$21.99
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-6.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
21.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.6% | $45.68M | $41.91M |
| 2 | 16.8% | $53.37M | $44.92M |
| 3 | 12.1% | $59.80M | $46.18M |
| 4 | 7.3% | $64.15M | $45.45M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $65.76M | $42.74M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$37.57M
Terminal Value
$1.04B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$673.94M
Enterprise Value
$895.14M
Net Debt
$359.69M
Equity Value
$535.45M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.71
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.98
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
MarketBeat · 29.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
Motley Fool · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 68/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PSTL currently scores 68/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PSTL's estimated fair value is $21.99, which is 6.9% below the current price of $23.63. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PSTL's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 25.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 123.8%; Free cash flow growth: 22.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: P/E: 50.3; ROC 12 days: -0.5%; Return on equity (ROE): 5.0% — weak.
Yes — PSTL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donahoe Patrick R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 3,198 | +3,198 | — |
| LEFKOWITZ BARRY | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 3,198 | +3,198 | — |
| LEFKOWITZ BARRY | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 4,776 | +4,776 | — |
| Donahoe Patrick R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 9,381 | +9,381 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 3,198 | +3,198 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 4,093 | +4,093 | — |
| Gural-Senders Jane | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 3,070 | +3,070 | — |
| Gural-Senders Jane | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 3,198 | +3,198 | — |
| LEFKOWITZ BARRY | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 45,061 | +4,776 | — |
| LEFKOWITZ BARRY | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 48,259 | +3,198 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 41,764 | +4,093 | — |
| FEINGOLD ANTON | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 44,962 | +3,198 | — |
| Donahoe Patrick R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 82,644 | +9,381 | — |
| Donahoe Patrick R | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 85,842 | +3,198 | — |
| Gural-Senders Jane | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 35,454 | +3,070 | — |
| Gural-Senders Jane | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.6.2026 | 38,652 | +3,198 | — |
| Garber Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 4,914 | -4,914 | $20.55 |
| Garber Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $20.60 |
| Garber Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 228,365 | -15,000 | $20.60 |
| Garber Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 223,451 | -4,914 | $20.55 |
| Brandwein Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 3,176 | +3,176 | — |
| Brandwein Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.2.2026 | 124,745 | +3,176 | — |
| Bakke Stephen Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 8,383 | +8,383 | — |
| Bakke Stephen Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 10,246 | +10,246 | — |
| Brandwein Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.2.2026 | 2,350 | +2,350 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,732,657 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,254,406 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology