Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$20.44
▲ $0.13 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/23 04:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$494.40M
Day Range
$20.36 - $20.74
52-Week Range
$13.91 - $21.10
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.10.2026
Support
$19.50
Resistance
$21.10
+37.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $23.80 vs. price $20.44 (+16.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
50
Value
67
Momentum
59
Risk
58
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
46
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ponce Financial Group, Inc. has primarily centered on its second-quarter 2026 financial performance, where earnings per share ($0.35) fell short of analyst expectations ($0.37) despite a 40% year-over-year increase. The company also reported revenue of $31.588 million, surpassing estimates. Additionally, there was news of two new appointments to its Board of Directors, José L. Orengo and Edward Delatorre Jr. The focus also included general investor interest and momentum trends, though no major strategic shifts or controversies were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ponce Financial Group, Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 3 of the last 12 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
35
Fundamentals
46
Technical
59
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
36
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for PDLB strongly suggests anchoring, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (1.8%) dominates other signals. Herding (33) and FOMO (22) coexist but are secondary, reflecting relative strength and momentum chasing. The narrative gap (-12) hints at a disconnect between perceived fundamentals (narrativeScore 38) and technical reality (realityScore 50), yet anchoring remains the primary psychological anchor. The key question: Will traders break resistance or retreat below it, or will the stock test the next anchor point? The absence of panic or euphoria suggests a measured, momentum-driven environment rather than extreme sentiment.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:37 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""reported quarterly earnings of $0.35 per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $0.37""
""Here's Why Momentum in Ponce Financial (PDLB) Should Keep going""
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and fundamental/cycle-sensitive investors. Peter Lynch’s high score (90) and bullish 'growth candidate' verdict suggest he sees untapped upside in the stock’s fundamentals, aligning with his belief in buying companies ahead of their price reflecting true potential. Meanwhile, Fisher’s lack of data and Veblen’s low score (14) hint at either insufficient transparency or a speculative, trend-chasing dynamic that clashes with their disciplined, long-term approaches. On the other end, cycle-aware investors like Nelson (20) and Marks (51) flag overbought conditions or mid-cycle risks, while Graham’s mixed verdict (57) and the enterprising investor’s lower score (51) indicate the stock doesn’t meet his strict valuation or margin-of-safety thresholds. The contrast between Lynch’s enthusiasm and the caution of Livermore (55), Schwager (25), or Bogle’s efficient-market skepticism (38) underscores whether this is a hidden gem or a speculative bet with weak structural support.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 90
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 84
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 58
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 52
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 38
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 14
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 13
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$19.50
Range Bottom
$21.10
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
5.3%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.21
Cash
$126.15M
Total Debt
$596.10M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.10
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.44
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$23.80
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+16.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $60.08M | $55.12M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $64.96M | $54.67M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $69.02M | $53.30M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $72.04M | $51.03M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $73.84M | $47.99M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$54.62M
Terminal Value
$1.16B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$756.77M
Enterprise Value
$1.02B
Net Debt
$469.95M
Equity Value
$548.94M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$23.48
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.48
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 12 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 22.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
Zacks · 27.7.2026
Associated Press · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 15.7.2026
Zacks · 6.7.2026
Zacks · 2.7.2026
Zacks · 29.6.2026
Zacks · 12.6.2026
Ponce Financial Group, Inc. (PDLB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PDLB currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PDLB's estimated fair value is $23.80, which is 16.5% above the current price of $20.44. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PDLB's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $23.80 vs. price $20.44 (+16.5%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 160.9%; Free cash flow growth: 1115.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -1.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index; ROC 12 days: -0.3%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PDLB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $13.31 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,929 | +2,929 | $10.44 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $10.33 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 4,000 | +4,000 | $13.31 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,929 | -2,929 | $10.44 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Open Market Sale | 11.2.2026 | 10,929 | -10,929 | $16.81 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $10.33 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $10.52 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $10.52 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 40,006 | +2,929 | $10.44 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 44,006 | +4,000 | $13.31 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 46,006 | +2,000 | $10.33 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 48,006 | +2,000 | $10.52 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Open Market Sale | 11.2.2026 | 37,077 | -10,929 | $16.81 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 0 | -2,000 | $10.52 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 1,954 | -2,929 | $10.44 |
| Kouzilos Ioannis | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.2.2026 | 16,000 | -4,000 | $13.31 |
| DeLeon Melissa Antonia | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $18.89 |
| DeLeon Melissa Antonia | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $19.91 |
| DeLeon Melissa Antonia | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $19.57 |
| Campiz Betty Yolainy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $19.57 |
| Campiz Betty Yolainy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $19.23 |
| DeLeon Melissa Antonia | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Campiz Betty Yolainy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $18.56 |
| Campiz Betty Yolainy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.2.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $19.91 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
375,766 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 292,239 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology