Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$1.04
▲ $0.02 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:11 PM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$25.45M
Day Range
$1.00 - $1.09
52-Week Range
$0.61 - $2.07
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$0.61
Resistance
$1.17
-45.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 9/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 8.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Orion Digital (ORIO) exhibits a balanced yet nuanced profile, with its **investor score of 77** and **STRONG rating** driven primarily by robust technical indicators and positive earnings momentum. The stock demonstrates strong bullish technicals—trading above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a **positive MACD histogram**, and an **RSI of 63.1**, signaling healthy upward momentum. Additionally, the stock has delivered **+19.9% returns over the past three months relative to its benchmark**, reinforcing its recent outperformance. However, the **news category (score: 68)** reflects a mixed narrative, with neutral conference participation and earnings call transcripts offset by a **Q2 2026 earnings highlight** showing a **115% surge in adjusted EBITDA**, which provides a tailwind. Risk factors, however, weigh heavily: the **ATR (8.9% of price)** and **Kalmár ratio (-0.19, with a 75.9% max drawdown)** indicate volatility and historical underperformance, while declining trading volume despite rising prices suggests potential weakening institutional interest.
The stock trades above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 63.1, indicating strong upward momentum. The %K at 60.0 remains neutral, but the overall technical setup is bullish.
Strong technicals often precede sustained price appreciation, making this a key driver of the stock’s current valuation.
Most news items are neutral, but Q2 2026 earnings highlight a **115% adjusted EBITDA surge**, while conference participation remains routine. No major negative or positive catalysts dominate.
Earnings growth is a critical factor for investor confidence, though neutral news suggests limited near-term catalysts.
The ATR (8.9% of price) and Kalmár ratio (-0.19, with a 75.9% max drawdown) signal high volatility and historical underperformance. Declining volume despite price gains raises concerns about sustainability.
These risk metrics indicate potential for sharp corrections, which could outweigh current technical strength.
StockIQ conclusion
Orion Digital (ORIO) presents a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, with strong technical indicators and recent earnings growth supporting its STRONG rating. However, elevated volatility, historical underperformance, and declining volume introduce meaningful risk. The stock’s performance hinges on maintaining momentum while addressing structural concerns around liquidity and investor confidence. Without further catalysts or volume improvement, the current strength may remain fragile.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202671
This Week
76
7D Ago
↓ -5
Weakening
Technical
79
7D Ago: 87
↓ -8
News
68
7D Ago: 68
→ 0
Risk
34
7D Ago: 34
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $1.02
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 20 to -6 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $1.12
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 23 to 62 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
15d ago · $0.99
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $0.99
Evidence: 2.8x recent average volume
What happened after
15d ago · $0.99
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $1.01
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
17d ago · $1.01
Evidence: 2.6x recent average volume
What happened after
17d ago · $1.01
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
71 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 1, 2026
Then
74
$1.01
Now
71
$1.04
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
79
Risk
34
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Orion Digital Corp. highlights its strong financial performance and strategic initiatives. The company reported a **115% sequential increase in adjusted EBITDA** ($3.3 million in Q2 2026) alongside an **18% growth in wealth assets under management (AUM)**. Earnings per share ($0.03) surpassed estimates, though revenue slightly missed projections. Additionally, Orion announced the **commercial launch of its Intelligent Investing Platform** and confirmed CEO Greg Feller’s participation in the **H.C. Wainwright Global Investment Conference** in September.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Orion Digital Corp. - Common. News trend score: 68. Reason: 3 of the last 12 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
23
Fundamentals
—
Technical
79
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+16%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ORIO’s dominant herding behavior reflects relative underperformance in a peer group (-0.6% vs -1.5%), consistent with traders aligning away from laggards. FOMO (23) and euphoria (13) coexist due to positive momentum (ROC +2.9%) and sentiment (68/100), but low volume (0.65x) dampens urgency. The anchoring gap (16.3% from resistance) may reinforce cautious alignment. The key question: *Will peer weakness persist, or will ORIO’s momentum attract fresh buyers?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adjusted EBITDA surges 115% sequentially"
"Earnings of $0.03 per share beat estimate of $0.01 by 200%"
"Orion Digital launches its Intelligent Investing Platform"
"Greg Feller to participate in H.C. Wainwright’s 28th Annual Global Investment Conference"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles, the model estimates that Livermore’s price‑action focus yields a strong positive score, while Mackay sees only moderate crowd enthusiasm and Marks places the stock near the middle of a cycle. Most value‑ and growth‑oriented frameworks (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Bagehot, Veblen, and Graham‑Enterprising) sit at a neutral 50 because they lack sufficient balance‑sheet, valuation, or earnings data to form a decisive read. Schwager, the efficient‑market view, and Nelson flag weaker cases, citing no clear edge, mixed evidence versus an index, and an overbought cycle respectively, and Loeb and Smith highlight heightened risk and insufficient dividend‑growth information. Housel’s zero score underscores the volatility that would likely unsettle patient investors, contrasting sharply with Livermore’s bullish momentum signal.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 61
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 43
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 12 articles.
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 9.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Business Wire · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Business Wire · 4.8.2026
MT Newswires · 27.7.2026
Business Wire · 27.7.2026
Business Wire · 26.6.2026
Business Wire · 23.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Orion Digital Corp. - Common (ORIO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ORIO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ORIO's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 60.1 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 8.5% of price; Calmar: -0.15 (3y annualized return -11.2% / max drawdown 75.9%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ORIO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
371,431 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 262,989 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 10.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology