Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$93.46
▲ $0.24 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:29 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$58.91B
Day Range
$92.28 - $95.01
52-Week Range
$64.02 - $99.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$83.48
Resistance
$99.85
OKE is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+27.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 55.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $37.13 vs. price $93.46 (-60.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
89/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
93/100
Analog Quality
+5.2%
Median 40D Outcome
65/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+3.8% … +6.9%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
27%
-9.7% … -4.3%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +4.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
9 occurrence(s) · 78% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
4 occurrence(s) · 75% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 47% (25%–70%) | +1.0% | +0.4% … +4.6% | +0.6% |
| 10D | 67% (42%–85%) | +2.5% | -0.0% … +5.9% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +4.3% | +0.6% … +6.2% | +1.6% |
| 40D | 80% (55%–93%) | +5.2% | +2.0% … +10.7% | +3.0% |
| 60D | 80% (55%–93%) | +7.0% | +2.2% … +13.0% | +3.1% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-19 | 89/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +5.7% | +22.0% |
| 2024-01-22 | 89/100 | Consolidation | +3.3% | +12.0% |
| 2024-06-04 | 89/100 | Consolidation | +4.8% | +14.1% |
| 2021-06-18 | 88/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.3% | +0.1% |
| 2019-08-06 | 87/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +4.3% | +2.8% |
| 2024-11-01 | 87/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +18.3% | +4.1% |
| 2023-02-24 | 87/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -12.0% | -14.0% |
| 2023-12-13 | 86/100 | Consolidation | +5.0% | +15.4% |
| 2023-05-05 | 86/100 | Consolidation | -9.0% | +1.6% |
| 2024-07-25 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +7.5% | +19.4% |
| 2024-05-03 | 86/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.0% | +7.9% |
| 2026-06-24 | 85/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +6.8% | +7.0% |
| 2024-09-27 | 84/100 | Uptrend | +7.1% | +11.9% |
| 2026-05-12 | 84/100 | Consolidation | +2.4% | -2.3% |
| 2026-04-10 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -1.2% | +5.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
46
Risk
34
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
56
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING OKE...
Recent media coverage of Oneok (OKE) has primarily focused on its strategic financial moves and market performance. The company announced a **$4.4 billion acquisition** of Brazos Midstream’s Permian Basin assets, backed by a **$9 billion minority investment** from Apollo funds, aiming to reduce debt while offering a **7% capped return** to investors. Analysts, including Citigroup, have raised price targets and maintained a **Buy rating**, citing strong earnings growth and midstream energy sector stability. Stock performance post-earnings has also been highlighted, with OKE up **9.2%** since its last report.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Oneok. News trend score: 92. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
56
Technical
46
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
71
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **Overconfidence** bias, where traders may be overestimating OKE’s value despite weak momentum and a massive 163% premium over DCF. Herding is also strong, as today’s outperformance relative to peers implies active copying behavior. The **narrative gap** (63 vs. 41) further implies traders are prioritizing optimism over fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders sustain overvaluation despite lagging price momentum?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:05 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Is ONEOK Stock Outperforming the Dow?"
"Why Is Oneok (OKE) Up 9.2% Since Last Earnings Report?"
"Citigroup raises ONEOK price target to $108"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Edgar Lawrence Smith’s documented principles, the model estimates a strong buy‑and‑hold case with a score of 69, while Charles Mackay’s crowd‑excitement lens yields a moderately positive 61. In contrast, Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria and Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus produce very low scores of 15 and 3 respectively, indicating caution or avoidance. Mid‑range scores from Philip Fisher, Howard Marks (both cycle and risk lenses), and the efficient‑market view reflect a mixed view that the stock has some merits but lacks the exceptional quality or valuation edge these investors require. Overall, the divergence between growth‑oriented, long‑term frameworks and value‑or risk‑adjusted frameworks leads to a spread of conclusions, from enthusiastic endorsement to strong reservation.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 53
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 37
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 31
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 26
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 23
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 17
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 16
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 6
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 3
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
30.5%
Operating Margin
17.1%
Net Margin
10.1%
EBITDA Margin
21.6%
ROE
15.1%
ROA
5.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.43
Cash
$78.00M
Total Debt
$32.00B
Current Ratio
0.71
Debt/Equity
1.42
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.8.2026 | $1.070 |
| 2.8.2026 | $1.070 |
| 4.5.2026 | $1.070 |
| 3.5.2026 | $1.070 |
| 2.2.2026 | $1.070 |
| 1.2.2026 | $1.070 |
| 3.11.2025 | $1.030 |
| 2.11.2025 | $1.030 |
| 1.8.2025 | $1.030 |
| 31.7.2025 | $1.030 |
| 5.5.2025 | $1.030 |
| 4.5.2025 | $1.030 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$93.46
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$37.13
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-60.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
18.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.9% | $2.91B | $2.67B |
| 2 | 14.8% | $3.34B | $2.81B |
| 3 | 10.7% | $3.70B | $2.86B |
| 4 | 6.6% | $3.94B | $2.79B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.04B | $2.63B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.45B
Terminal Value
$63.71B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$41.40B
Enterprise Value
$55.16B
Net Debt
$31.92B
Equity Value
$23.24B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$35.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$18.42
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 5 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Oneok (OKE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
OKE currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, OKE's estimated fair value is $37.13, which is 60.3% below the current price of $93.46. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
OKE's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 55.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $37.13 vs. price $93.46 (-60.3%); Current ratio: 0.71; Calmar: 0.25 (3y annualized return 11.3% / max drawdown 45.1%).
Yes — OKE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEARS MARY M | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| SPEARS MARY M | Gift | 28.5.2026 | 27,353 | -1,000 | — |
| DERKSEN BRIAN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| LARSON RANDALL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| Gobillot Lori | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| EDWARDS JULIE H | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| Smith Wayne Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| RODRIGUEZ EDUARDO A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,476 | +1,476 | $92.15 |
| RODRIGUEZ EDUARDO A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 369 | +369 | $92.15 |
| HELDERMAN MARK W | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 3,039 | +3,039 | $92.15 |
| Owodunni Precious W | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 1,845 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| LARSON RANDALL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 4,052 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| EDWARDS JULIE H | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 68,630 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| MCCOLLUM MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 2,572 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| RODRIGUEZ EDUARDO A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 29,972 | +1,476 | $92.15 |
| RODRIGUEZ EDUARDO A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 17,229 | +369 | $92.15 |
| Gobillot Lori | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 9,209 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| DERKSEN BRIAN L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 41,803 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| HELDERMAN MARK W | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 38,704 | +3,039 | $92.15 |
| Owodunni Precious W | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 2,572 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| Smith Wayne Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 8,063 | +1,845 | $92.15 |
| SWORDS SHERIDAN C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.2.2026 | 4,924.535 | +4,924.535 | — |
| SWORDS SHERIDAN C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.2.2026 | 2,225.535 | -2,225.535 | $87.33 |
| Taylor Lyndon C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 22.2.2026 | 8,538.595 | -8,538.595 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,010,149 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 29,727,370 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 74.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology