Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$12.73
▼ $0.02 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$1.08B
Day Range
$12.65 - $12.84
52-Week Range
$10.73 - $16.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$11.80
Resistance
$15.01
NPKI is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+15.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 27.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $6.01 vs. price $12.73 (-52.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
16
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of NPK International Inc. has primarily focused on leadership changes and financial performance. The company announced that its CFO, Gregg Piontek, will retire by late 2027 after nearly 20 years, triggering a succession plan for finance leadership. Additionally, NPK highlighted record rental revenue and positive earnings in its Q2 2026 results, with analysts noting potential growth tied to expanding utility infrastructure.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NPK International Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
49
Fundamentals
65
Technical
16
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+30
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant overconfidence (score 45) suggests traders may be ignoring negative momentum (-5.9% ROC) while overvaluing the stock (+126% above DCF). The narrative gap (28) implies optimism exceeds fundamentals, reinforcing overconfidence. However, muted panic (score 14) and neutral volume (1.05x) suggest no immediate sell-off pressure. The key question: Will traders adjust valuations when fundamentals fail to materialize?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 02:51 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gregg Piontek, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, notified the Company of his intention to retire from the position of CFO on or before August 31, 2027"
"Record Rental Revenue and ..."
"Do NPK International’s (NPKI) Upgraded 2026 Targets Clarify Its Earnings Quality Story?"
"NPK International Q2 Adjusted Earnings, Revenue Rise; Narrows 2026 Revenue Guidance"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher both assigning it near-maximal scores (96 and 84, respectively), framing it as a high-quality growth candidate and exceptional business. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham and Jesse Livermore reject it outright (scores of 19 and 12), citing defensive failures and a negative trend—highlighting a clash between growth-at-any-cost and value/technical discipline. The middle ground is broad: Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Edgar Lawrence Smith see it as a cyclical or long-term hold, while Howard Marks (both versions) warns of overpriced expectations. Even Morgan Housel, a patient compounder, scores it moderately (66), suggesting it’s viable for steady investors—but not a slam dunk. The contrast between Fisher’s quality focus and Livermore’s trend-following rules underscores how the same stock can be either a blue-chip gem or a speculative gamble, depending on the framework.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 84
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 70
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 54
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 19
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 19
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.4%
Operating Margin
16.9%
Net Margin
14.1%
EBITDA Margin
26.1%
ROE
11.1%
ROA
8.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.46
Cash
$5.14M
Total Debt
$16.86M
Current Ratio
1.43
Debt/Equity
0.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$12.73
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$6.01
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-52.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
13.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.2% | $29.80M | $27.34M |
| 2 | 10.6% | $32.95M | $27.73M |
| 3 | 7.9% | $35.54M | $27.44M |
| 4 | 5.2% | $37.38M | $26.48M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $38.32M | $24.90M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$26.32M
Terminal Value
$604.21M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$392.70M
Enterprise Value
$526.59M
Net Debt
$11.72M
Equity Value
$514.87M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$4.10
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.96
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 31.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
ChartMill · 29.7.2026
Business Wire · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
Business Wire · 28.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.7.2026
Business Wire · 15.7.2026
NPK International Inc. (NPKI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NPKI currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NPKI's estimated fair value is $6.01, which is 52.8% below the current price of $12.73. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NPKI's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 27.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 126.2%; Free cash flow growth: 590.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $6.01 vs. price $12.73 (-52.8%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NPKI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBESON ROSE M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 215,147 | -10,000 | $13.49 |
| ROBESON ROSE M | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $13.49 |
| Lewis Michael A | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,013 | -2,013 | $14.26 |
| Pederson Kristen J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 6,614 | +6,614 | — |
| Pederson Kristen J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.7.2026 | 6,614 | +6,614 | — |
| Briggs Lori | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 8,325 | -8,325 | $14.75 |
| Briggs Lori | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 247,165 | -8,325 | $14.75 |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 167,375 | -167,375 | $14.43 |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 254,699 | -167,375 | $14.43 |
| Briggs Lori | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 10,446 | -10,446 | $14.58 |
| Briggs Lori | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 255,490 | -10,446 | $14.58 |
| Briggs Lori | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 24,340 | +24,340 | — |
| Briggs Lori | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 9,577 | -9,577 | $14.31 |
| Briggs Lori | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 24,340 | -24,340 | — |
| Briggs Lori | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 6,777 | -6,777 | $14.31 |
| Piontek Gregg | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 40,379 | -40,379 | — |
| Briggs Lori | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 5,401 | -5,401 | $14.31 |
| Piontek Gregg | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 40,379 | +40,379 | — |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 39,423 | -39,423 | $14.31 |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 27,894 | -27,894 | $14.31 |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 22,232 | -22,232 | $14.31 |
| Piontek Gregg | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 15,889 | -15,889 | $14.31 |
| LANIGAN MATTHEW | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 100,188 | -100,188 | — |
| Fruge Mary Celeste | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 17,274 | -17,274 | — |
| Fruge Mary Celeste | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 3,833 | -3,833 | $14.31 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,223,310 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,531,987 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology