Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$13.06
▼ $0.04 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/27 03:47 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$13.02 - $13.35
52-Week Range
$12.96 - $19.84
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$12.95
Resistance
$16.45
-30.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $8.19 vs. price $13.06 (-37.3%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
9
Risk
56
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
45
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Newmark Group, Inc. has primarily centered on its strategic expansion and financial performance. The company made headlines in early September 2026 for acquiring Altus Group’s Development Advisory business, signaling growth in its advisory services. Additionally, analysts highlighted Newmark’s strong Q2 earnings, optimistic fiscal year outlook, and undervalued stock potential, with some raising price targets and praising its resilience in the real estate sector amid broader industry challenges.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Newmark Group, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
45
Technical
9
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-14%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant *Overconfidence* bias, where traders appear to prioritize perceived upside potential (+86% DCF premium) over lagging momentum. The narrative gap (63 vs. 37) further indicates a disconnect between optimistic expectations and fundamental performance. While FOMO and herding signals exist, they’re secondary to the overvaluation-driven confidence. The key question: *Will traders sustain faith in the stock’s growth narrative despite weak execution?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:05 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Newmark announced it has acquired the Development Advisory business of Altus Group Limited"
"strong Q2, upbeat FY26 EPS +15–22% outlook"
"Barclays analyst maintains Newmark Group with an Overweight rating and raises price target"
"Is Newmark’s 2026 CEO Transition and Leadership Depth Altering The Investment Case"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some legendary investors seeing strong growth potential while others flag severe risks or market inefficiencies. Peter Lynch and Edgar Lawrence Smith both rate it as a high-conviction 'buy and hold' candidate, praising its underpriced growth or long-term fundamentals—Lynch even suggests the price hasn’t yet reflected its true upside. Meanwhile, Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Charles Mackay detect cyclical tailwinds or crowd-driven momentum, though with caution, while Fisher and Housel acknowledge solid qualities but temper expectations with realism. At the opposite end, Graham’s strict valuation rules and Livermore’s trend-following discipline reject it outright, with Graham calling it statistically overpriced even for his more aggressive investor profile. The divide underscores whether the stock’s growth justifies its valuation or if it’s already priced for perfection—with no clear middle ground between bullish optimism and bearish skepticism.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 79
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 69
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 55
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 37
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 31
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 11
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
7.1%
Net Margin
3.8%
EBITDA Margin
12.6%
ROE
8.6%
ROA
2.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.71
Cash
$229.11M
Total Debt
$671.75M
Current Ratio
1.05
Debt/Equity
0.46
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.060 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.060 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.060 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.030 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.030 |
| 17.11.2025 | $0.030 |
| 16.11.2025 | $0.030 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 13.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 14.5.2025 | $0.030 |
| 13.5.2025 | $0.030 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.030 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.06
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$8.19
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-37.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.5% | $153.30M | $140.64M |
| 2 | 6.2% | $162.86M | $137.08M |
| 3 | 5.0% | $170.99M | $132.04M |
| 4 | 3.7% | $177.40M | $125.67M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $181.83M | $118.18M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$142.63M
Terminal Value
$2.87B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.86B
Enterprise Value
$2.52B
Net Debt
$442.64M
Equity Value
$2.07B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.77
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
PR Newswire · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
StockStory · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Zacks · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NMRK currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NMRK's estimated fair value is $8.19, which is 37.3% below the current price of $13.06. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NMRK's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.3%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 100.0%; Free cash flow growth: 444.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $8.19 vs. price $13.06 (-37.3%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — NMRK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McIntyre Kenneth A Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 44,903 | +3,524 | — |
| ALVARADO LUIS | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 7,917 | -16,448 | $14.19 |
| Bauer Virginia S | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 64,162 | +3,524 | — |
| Rispoli Michael J. | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 672,217 | -25,000 | $14.19 |
| Itzkowitz Jay | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 46,812 | +3,524 | — |
| MERKEL STEPHEN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 41,963 | +41,963 | — |
| MERKEL STEPHEN M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 31,614 | -10,349 | $15.54 |
| MERKEL STEPHEN M | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 41,963 | +41,963 | — |
| MERKEL STEPHEN M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 10,349 | -10,349 | $15.54 |
| Gosin Barry M | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 328,812 | -3,571,183 | $15.13 |
| Gosin Barry M | Disposition to the Company | 17.8.2026 | 3,571,183 | -3,571,183 | $15.13 |
| Gosin Barry M | Disposition to the Company | 29.7.2026 | 300,000 | -300,000 | $14.89 |
| Gosin Barry M | Disposition to the Company | 29.7.2026 | 3,599,995 | -300,000 | $14.89 |
| CANTOR FITZGERALD, L. P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 137,831 | +137,831 | — |
| Lutnick Brandon | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 137,831 | +137,831 | — |
| CF GROUP MANAGEMENT INC | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 137,831 | +137,831 | — |
| CANTOR FITZGERALD, L. P. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 20,521,166 | +137,831 | — |
| CF GROUP MANAGEMENT INC | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 20,521,166 | +137,831 | — |
| Lutnick Brandon | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 20,521,166 | +137,831 | — |
| ALVARADO LUIS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 1,543 | -1,543 | $14.19 |
| Rispoli Michael J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 32,824 | -32,824 | $14.19 |
| Lutnick Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 680 | -680 | $14.19 |
| Rispoli Michael J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 697,217 | -32,824 | $14.19 |
| Lutnick Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 9,143 | -680 | $14.19 |
| ALVARADO LUIS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 24,365 | -1,543 | $14.19 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,316,201 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,831,966 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology