Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$42.42
▼ $0.09 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/22 09:06 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$3.19B
Day Range
$42.29 - $43.29
52-Week Range
$34.84 - $46.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$40.33
Resistance
$46.74
+9.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/23 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $98.50 vs. price $42.42 (+132.2%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
61
Quality
No data available
Value
67
Momentum
32
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
62
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on NMI Holdings Inc. has primarily focused on its performance relative to peers in the property & casualty insurance sector, particularly during Q2 earnings. Analysts compared NMIH’s results to other insurers, noting its stock gains—up 20.9% in three months—while broader industry trends, such as premium growth and underwriting challenges, were also highlighted. No direct company-specific news beyond insider share sales (worth $7.7 million) and general sector comparisons was reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about NMI Holdings Inc. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
62
Technical
32
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
NMIH’s dominant herding behavior reflects relative underperformance (-1.0% vs. peers’ -2.0%), consistent with investors aligning with broader sector trends. The narrative gap (8-point discrepancy) hints at a disconnect between optimistic sentiment (92/100) and technical weakness, possibly amplifying herding. Weak momentum (-2.2% ROC) and neutral RSI (49) suggest caution, but euphoria persists due to valuation disconnects (11.4% above 200-day avg). The key question: Will herding sustain or shift as sentiment aligns with technicals?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:34 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"NMIH Gains 20.9% in Three Months: What Investors Should Know?"
"Q2 Rundown: NMI Holdings (NASDAQ:NMIH) Vs Other Property & Casualty Insurance Stocks"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for NMIH reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors weigh value, momentum, and risk. Benjamin Graham’s *defensive* framework overwhelmingly favors the stock (95), seeing it as a rare bargain with a wide margin of safety, while his *enterprising* bar remains far more cautious (59), suggesting it lacks the extreme undervaluation he demanded. Meanwhile, technical and cyclical approaches like Samuel Nelson (68) and Morgan Housel (65) lean positive, interpreting the stock’s price action as either oversold or a quiet long-term compounder—both aligned with patient, trend-following strategies. In contrast, Fisher (48) and Smith (29) dismiss it outright, rejecting its growth or stability as insufficient to meet their rigorous standards, while efficient-market adherents (51) and Schwager (51) see no clear edge over passive indexing. The middle ground—Marks (59), Lynch (56), and Veblen (52)—suggests the stock may have merit but carries risks of overvaluation or speculative hype, mirroring Mackay’s (63) warning of crowd-driven excitement.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 96
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 68
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 63
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 58
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 263 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
55.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
15.0%
ROA
10.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.01
Cash
$43.94M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$42.42
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$98.50
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+132.2%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.5% | $455.95M | $418.30M |
| 2 | 8.5% | $494.80M | $416.47M |
| 3 | 6.5% | $527.04M | $406.97M |
| 4 | 4.5% | $550.79M | $390.19M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $564.56M | $366.93M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$412.52M
Terminal Value
$8.90B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.79B
Enterprise Value
$7.78B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$7.78B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$32.79
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$32.75
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
StockStory · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 18.8.2026
NMI Holdings Inc (NMIH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NMIH currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NMIH's estimated fair value is $98.50, which is 132.2% above the current price of $42.42. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NMIH's technical score is 32/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $98.50 vs. price $42.42 (+132.2%); Price is above the 200-day average; +5.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; ADX 28.9 — strong trend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NMIH.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 16,264 | +16,264 | $18.70 |
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 19,435 | -19,435 | — |
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 25,426 | -25,426 | — |
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 16,264 | -16,264 | — |
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 19,435 | +19,435 | $16.00 |
| Pollitzer Adam | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 25,426 | +25,426 | $22.19 |
| Pollitzer Adam | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 172,706 | -172,706 | $44.86 |
| Swithenbank Aurora | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 50,734 | -11,662 | $44.51 |
| Swithenbank Aurora | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 11,662 | -11,662 | $44.51 |
| Smith Robert Owen | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 96,381 | -12,000 | $44.65 |
| Smith Robert Owen | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 12,000 | -12,000 | $44.65 |
| Montgomery Michael Curry | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 69,026 | -1,554 | $37.90 |
| Montgomery Michael Curry | Open Market Sale | 19.5.2026 | 1,554 | -1,554 | $37.90 |
| Huskins Priya Cherian | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 36,164 | +4,512 | — |
| EMBLER MICHAEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 50,558 | +4,512 | — |
| Erickson John C | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 21,832 | +4,512 | — |
| Montgomery Michael Curry | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 70,580 | +4,512 | — |
| SCHEID STEVEN | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 8,951 | +4,512 | — |
| Agrawal Renu | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 8,663 | +4,512 | — |
| McCreary Lynn S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 48,757 | +4,512 | — |
| EMBLER MICHAEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,512 | +4,512 | — |
| Erickson John C | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,512 | +4,512 | — |
| SCHEID STEVEN | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,512 | +4,512 | — |
| Agrawal Renu | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,512 | +4,512 | — |
| McCreary Lynn S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 4,512 | +4,512 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,818,100 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,829,392 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology