Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$15.28
▲ $0.00 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/27 05:10 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$45.99M
Day Range
$15.10 - $15.28
52-Week Range
$10.32 - $15.79
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$14.16
Resistance
$15.48
+46.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/22 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 3200.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
-7.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
65
Risk
58
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
46
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Marathon Bancorp, Inc.. News trend score: 44. Reason: 1 of the last 1 articles are negative, versus 0 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
46
Technical
65
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 22/100
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 89
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 42
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 39
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 22
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 22
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$14.16
Range Bottom
$15.48
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
3.7%
ROA
0.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.67
Cash
$20.81M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$15.28
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$13.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $2.22M | $2.04M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $2.40M | $2.02M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $2.55M | $1.97M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $2.66M | $1.89M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.73M | $1.78M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.02M
Terminal Value
$43.07M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$27.99M
Enterprise Value
$37.69M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$37.69M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 1 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Marathon Bancorp, Inc. (MBBC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MBBC currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MBBC's estimated fair value is $13.81, which is 9.6% below the current price of $15.28. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MBBC's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 3200.0%; Free cash flow growth: 59.1%; Net income growth: 4120.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: -7.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend; %K 87.4 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MBBC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 5 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatz Nora | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 29,259 | +962 | $6.48 |
| Spatz Nora | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 1,199 | -1,201 | — |
| Spatz Nora | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 28,297 | +1,201 | $8.13 |
| Spatz Nora | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.9.2026 | 1,921 | -962 | — |
| Spatz Nora | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 27,599 | +6,450 | — |
| Spatz Nora | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 11,000 | +11,000 | — |
| Zillges Nicholas W | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 56,235 | +16,934 | — |
| Zillges Nicholas W | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 42,335 | +42,335 | — |
| Knopf Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,782 | +5,450 | — |
| Knopf Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Cornish Terry | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 6,503 | +3,500 | — |
| Cornish Terry | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 7,000 | +7,000 | — |
| Zientara Amy | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 27,110 | +3,386 | — |
| Zientara Amy | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,467 | +8,467 | — |
| Grimm Thomas L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 6,384 | +3,386 | — |
| Grimm Thomas L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,467 | +8,467 | — |
| Wimmer Timothy R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 6,384 | +3,386 | — |
| Wimmer Timothy R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,467 | +8,467 | — |
| Werth Ann M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,501 | +3,386 | — |
| Werth Ann M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,467 | +8,467 | — |
| Spatz Nora | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 39,520 | +602 | $14.75 |
| Zillges Nicholas W | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 51,160 | +170 | $14.75 |
| Knopf Michelle | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 19,339 | +164 | $14.75 |
| Cornish Terry | Open Market Purchase | 10.6.2026 | 27,205 | +219 | $14.75 |
| Spatz Nora | Open Market Purchase | 9.6.2026 | 38,918 | +1,904 | $14.50 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,405 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 6,664 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
31.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 22.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology