Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$17.90
▲ $0.66 (+3.8%)
Market data updated: 09/26 07:03 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$2.03B
Day Range
$17.15 - $17.91
52-Week Range
$11.38 - $25.22
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$16.02
Resistance
$20.55
KSS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+11.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 142.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
63
Value
60
Momentum
59
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Kohl’s Corporation has centered on leadership changes, financial adjustments, and strategic partnerships. The retailer appointed a former Walmart fashion executive as its new chief merchant and named Ryan Waymire as Chief Merchandising Officer, signaling a shift in its leadership. Kohl’s also benefited from a tariff refund boosting second-quarter profits despite slight sales declines, while expanding delivery options through partnerships like DoorDash. Additionally, the company addressed challenges in its Sephora sales performance. Overall, Kohl’s has seen stock gains amid broader retail sector rotations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kohl's Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
33
Fundamentals
50
Technical
59
Valuation
60
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
KSS’s psychology is dominated by herding, as today’s outperformance relative to peers (+0.5% vs. +1.3%) suggests traders are aligning with sector momentum rather than independent analysis. Euphoria (34) and FOMO (29) coexist, fueled by strong sentiment (86/100) and momentum, while confirmation bias (26) reflects a disconnect between narrative optimism and stagnant fundamentals. The key question: *Is the herding behavior driven by genuine conviction or opportunistic positioning?* Overconfidence (5) hints at potential detachment from fundamentals, but the absence of panic or loss aversion suggests no immediate defensive shift.
Updated: 09/04/2026, 11:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Kohl’s names Walmart fashion alum as chief merchant"
"Gap, Kohl’s among retailers adding DoorDash delivery option"
"Tariff refund lifts Kohl’s Q2 profits despite slight sales decline"
"Kohl’s rallies 7% on rotation into beaten-down retail"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between value and growth-oriented methodologies. Benjamin Graham and his enterprising counterpart both rate it highly—above 80—seeing it as a statistically discounted opportunity, whether defensive or speculative. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch also leans bullish, viewing it as a growth stock where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential. However, more cautious or cyclical investors like Jesse Livermore, Howard Marks, and Morgan Housel score it far lower, warning of unclear trends, stretched valuations, or volatility risks. Even growth purist Philip Fisher dismisses it, while technical/cycle-focused thinkers like Nelson and Marks (Market Cycle) flag it as overbought or late-stage. The contrast highlights a tension between undervaluation (Graham/Lynch) and overvaluation or risk (Livermore/Nelson), with middle-ground thinkers like Smith and Veblen offering cautious optimism.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 86
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 85
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 81
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 58
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 36
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (5 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
40.6%
Operating Margin
4.0%
Net Margin
1.8%
EBITDA Margin
8.5%
ROE
6.7%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.43
Cash
$674.00M
Total Debt
$1.44B
Current Ratio
1.46
Debt/Equity
0.35
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 9.9.2026 | $0.125 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.125 |
| 9.6.2026 | $0.125 |
| 18.3.2026 | $0.125 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.125 |
| 10.12.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.12.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.125 |
| 9.9.2025 | $0.125 |
| 11.6.2025 | $0.125 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.125 |
| 21.3.2025 | $0.125 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$35.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$35.51
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 9.9.2026
Kohl's Corporation (KSS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KSS currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
KSS's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 142.9%; Net income growth: 149.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.3% of price; Calmar: -0.04 (3y annualized return -3.3% / max drawdown 79.1%); Revenue growth (last year): -4.3%.
Yes — KSS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlin Wendy C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 63,934 | +186 | — |
| COSSET YAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 70,818 | +100 | — |
| Floyd H. Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 64,591 | +88 | — |
| Villagomez Adolfo | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 44,066 | +99 | — |
| Mitchell Robbin | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 52,948 | +185 | — |
| COSSET YAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 70,876 | +58 | — |
| PRISING JONAS | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 113,291 | +103 | — |
| Mitchell Robbin | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 52,763 | +88 | — |
| Floyd H. Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 64,728 | +137 | — |
| Arlin Wendy C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 64,171 | +237 | — |
| Chaudhary Niren | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 7,603 | +55 | — |
| DEE STEVEN E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.9.2026 | 68,011 | +139 | — |
| DEE STEVEN E. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2026 | 65,973 | -2,038 | $17.17 |
| Villagomez Adolfo | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 43,967 | +1,562 | — |
| Arlin Wendy C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 63,748 | +8,850 | — |
| Chaudhary Niren | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 7,548 | +7,548 | — |
| Villagomez Adolfo | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 1,562 | +1,562 | — |
| Arlin Wendy C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 8,850 | +8,850 | — |
| Chaudhary Niren | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 7,548 | +7,548 | — |
| Kent Jennifer J. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 22,942 | -22,942 | $20.00 |
| Raymond Christie | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $20.00 |
| Kent Jennifer J. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 234,452 | -22,942 | $20.00 |
| Raymond Christie | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 261,720 | -15,000 | $20.00 |
| Steinmetz Mari | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 53 | -53 | $17.17 |
| Steinmetz Mari | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 243,119 | -53 | $17.17 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
33,349,657 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 30,692,752 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 57.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology