Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$64.71
▼ $0.02 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/15 06:30 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$3.68B
Day Range
$63.75 - $64.99
52-Week Range
$46.37 - $73.54
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
JOE is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+24.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $77.65 vs. price $64.71 (+20.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
34
Risk
42
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
70
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of St. Joe Company has highlighted its community and retail initiatives. The company gained attention for converting its former Panama City Beach headquarters into the Magnet Innovation Center, a top-ranked Florida public STEAM high school. Additionally, St. Joe announced retail growth at Watersound Town Center with major leases for Anthropologie and the opening of Johnnie-O. Investor focus also centered on its stock performance, with mixed valuation signals and notable interest from billionaire Bruce Berkowitz, who increased Fairholme Capital’s stake in the company.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about St. Joe Company (The). News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
46
Fundamentals
70
Technical
34
Valuation
62
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** as the dominant psychological state, driven by JOE’s slight outperformance relative to peers today. The narrative gap (11-point discrepancy) hints at a disconnect between optimistic sentiment (98/100) and valuation metrics (15% below DCF). Euphoria is muted by weak momentum and overvaluation, while FOMO and panic signals are balanced by subdued volatility. The key open question: *Will relative strength sustain, or will sentiment-driven buying fade as valuation gaps widen?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The St. Joe Company made its former corporate headquarters available to the Walton County School District for the creation of an innovative public STEAM high school."
"Anthropologie has executed a lease at Watersound Town Center for an approximately 9,000 square foot store."
"Bruce Berkowitz has built his entire Fairholme portfolio around a single Northwest Florida land developer."
"Weekly dividend summary for Dividend Champions, Contenders & Challengers"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some models seeing it as a high-potential opportunity while others flag significant red flags. Peter Lynch and Samuel Armstrong Nelson both rate it near the top (86 and 85, respectively), praising its growth potential and favorable cycle positioning—suggesting the price may still understate its long-term upside. Meanwhile, Fisher, Smith, and Housel also lean bullish, emphasizing its quality, durability, and quiet compounding traits. However, the divide widens sharply when considering more cautious or contrarian voices: Howard Marks and Thorstein Veblen express skepticism about inflated expectations or profit sustainability, while Graham, Livermore, and Schwager dismiss it outright, citing defensive weaknesses, trend resistance, or lack of disciplined setup. Even the efficient-market camp sees little justification for active selection, reinforcing the tension between growth enthusiasm and structural caution.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 86
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 78
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 78
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 72
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 57
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 31
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.1%
Operating Margin
28.5%
Net Margin
22.5%
EBITDA Margin
37.7%
ROE
15.1%
ROA
7.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.00
Cash
$129.61M
Total Debt
$391.16M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.51
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.160 |
| 9.6.2026 | $0.160 |
| 8.6.2026 | $0.160 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.160 |
| 8.3.2026 | $0.160 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.160 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.160 |
| 22.8.2025 | $0.140 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.140 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.140 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.140 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.140 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$64.71
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$77.65
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+20.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $233.30M | $214.03M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $278.50M | $234.41M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $316.79M | $244.62M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $342.53M | $242.66M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $351.10M | $228.19M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$186.64M
Terminal Value
$5.54B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.60B
Enterprise Value
$4.76B
Net Debt
$261.55M
Equity Value
$4.50B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.22
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 10 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Business Wire · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 18.8.2026
Yahoo · 18.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 12.8.2026
Exec Edge · 12.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 31.7.2026
MarketBeat · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
St. Joe Company (The) (JOE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
JOE currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, JOE's estimated fair value is $77.65, which is 20.0% above the current price of $64.71. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
JOE's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $77.65 vs. price $64.71 (+20.0%); Revenue growth (last year): 27.4%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 56.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 4.2% / max drawdown 35.9%); Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — JOE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 140,400 | -140,400 | $65.71 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 18.6.2026 | 15,073,624 | -140,400 | $65.71 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 26,700 | -26,700 | $65.03 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 15,214,024 | -26,700 | $65.03 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 94,200 | -94,200 | $65.59 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 15,240,724 | -94,200 | $65.59 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 63,800 | -63,800 | $65.25 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 15,334,924 | -63,800 | $65.25 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 29,200 | -29,200 | $65.13 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 10.6.2026 | 15,398,724 | -29,200 | $65.13 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 30,500 | -30,500 | $65.10 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 15,427,924 | -30,500 | $65.10 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 29,000 | -29,000 | $65.12 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 8.6.2026 | 15,458,424 | -29,000 | $65.12 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 33,600 | -33,600 | $65.18 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 5.6.2026 | 15,487,424 | -33,600 | $65.18 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 59,100 | -59,100 | $65.09 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 4.6.2026 | 15,521,024 | -59,100 | $65.09 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 29,200 | -29,200 | $65.49 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 15,580,124 | -29,200 | $65.49 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 86,500 | -86,500 | $66.09 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 15,609,324 | -86,500 | $66.09 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $65.33 |
| FAIRHOLME FUNDS INC | Open Market Sale | 7.5.2026 | 15,695,824 | -25,000 | $65.33 |
| BERKOWITZ BRUCE R | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 163,600 | -163,600 | $65.78 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,100,796 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 974,426 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology