Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$5.74
▲ $0.02 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/26 03:34 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$619.08M
Day Range
$5.64 - $5.78
52-Week Range
$3.98 - $7.17
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$5.52
Resistance
$7.17
INN is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+2.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$1.81 vs. price $5.74 (-131.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
66/100
Similarity
6
Historical Matches
67/100
Analog Quality
+24.5%
Median 40D Outcome
68/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
100%
+6.5% … +17.1%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
0%
— … —
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 6 similar historical cases for this stock, 100% (95% CI 61%–100%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +13.2%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Trend Acceleration
3 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 67% (30%–90%) | +4.6% | +0.4% … +6.9% | +1.3% |
| 10D | 67% (30%–90%) | +7.4% | +0.9% … +10.8% | +3.6% |
| 20D | 100% (61%–100%) | +13.2% | +6.5% … +17.1% | +7.9% |
| 40D | 67% (30%–90%) | +24.5% | +4.0% … +32.5% | +21.1% |
| 60D | 67% (30%–90%) | +23.5% | -4.9% … +42.5% | +30.4% |
Sample size: 6 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | 66/100 | Downtrend | +9.5% | +43.9% |
| 2026-04-06 | 62/100 | Consolidation | +17.2% | +53.6% |
| 2026-04-29 | 59/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +16.8% | +38.3% |
| 2026-05-27 | 54/100 | Uptrend | +20.6% | +8.6% |
| 2026-07-01 | 43/100 | Uptrend | +3.3% | -14.1% |
| 2026-06-12 | 42/100 | Uptrend | +5.5% | -9.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
42
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
50
Risk
36
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
27
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Summit Hotel Properties, Inc.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 5 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
47
Fundamentals
27
Technical
50
Valuation
43
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-19%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 13/100
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 86
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 84
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 60
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 58
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 46
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 29
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 13
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
9.0%
Net Margin
-1.6%
EBITDA Margin
29.5%
ROE
-1.4%
ROA
-0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.22
Cash
$36.11M
Total Debt
$1.39B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.62
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.080 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.080 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.080 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.080 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.080 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.080 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.080 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.080 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.080 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.080 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.080 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$5.74
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$1.81
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-131.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7% | $75.52M | $69.29M |
| 2 | 2.6% | $77.51M | $65.24M |
| 3 | 2.6% | $79.52M | $61.40M |
| 4 | 2.5% | $81.54M | $57.77M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $83.58M | $54.32M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$73.55M
Terminal Value
$1.32B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$856.61M
Enterprise Value
$1.16B
Net Debt
$1.36B
Equity Value
$-193.28M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.83
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
PR Newswire · 28.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 22.7.2026
Benzinga · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 16.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.7.2026
Zacks · 7.7.2026
PR Newswire · 1.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.6.2026
PR Newswire · 30.6.2026
Zacks · 30.6.2026
Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. (INN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 42/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
INN currently scores 42/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, INN's estimated fair value is -$1.81, which is 131.5% below the current price of $5.74. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
INN's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$1.81 vs. price $5.74 (-131.5%); Net margin: -1.6% (negative); Calmar: 0.03 (3y annualized return 1.5% / max drawdown 47.6%).
Yes — INN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storey Thomas W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 253,630 | +22,293 | — |
| Taitz Hope S | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 148,752 | +22,293 | — |
| Kay Kenneth J | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 166,835 | +22,293 | — |
| Belouizdad Amina | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 105,543 | +22,293 | — |
| Hanson Bjorn R.L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 180,263 | +22,293 | — |
| JONES JEFFREY W | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 166,835 | +22,293 | — |
| Patel Mehulkumar Bhikhubhai | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 95,686 | +22,293 | — |
| Stanner Jonathan P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 2,356,290 | -98,492 | — |
| Eng Christopher R. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 453,746 | -16,089 | — |
| Eng Christopher R. | Disposition to the Company | 13.3.2026 | 414,886 | -38,860 | — |
| RUIZ PAUL | Disposition to the Company | 13.3.2026 | 377,384 | -37,306 | — |
| Conkling William Higgins | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 939,545 | -29,969 | — |
| Conkling William Higgins | Disposition to the Company | 13.3.2026 | 846,281 | -93,264 | — |
| RUIZ PAUL | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 414,690 | -14,326 | — |
| Stanner Jonathan P | Disposition to the Company | 13.3.2026 | 2,099,813 | -256,477 | — |
| RUIZ PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 365,158 | +42,572 | — |
| Eng Christopher R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 403,316 | +44,346 | — |
| Stanner Jonathan P | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 2,454,782 | +439,024 | — |
| RUIZ PAUL | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 429,016 | +63,858 | — |
| Stanner Jonathan P | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 2,015,758 | +292,683 | — |
| Conkling William Higgins | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 779,935 | +126,386 | — |
| Conkling William Higgins | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 969,514 | +189,579 | — |
| Eng Christopher R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.3.2026 | 469,835 | +66,519 | — |
| Patel Mehulkumar Bhikhubhai | Open Market Sale | 5.1.2026 | 444,295 | -25,000 | $4.84 |
| Patel Mehulkumar Bhikhubhai | Open Market Sale | 18.12.2025 | 469,295 | -10,000 | $5.12 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,233,016 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,846,739 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
24.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology