Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$98.74
▲ $7.75 (+8.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:54 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$12.17B
Day Range
$90.32 - $99.01
52-Week Range
$31.67 - $140.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$75.31
Resistance
$120.38
+140.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 44.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -136.9% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
65
Risk
42
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
31
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Hut 8 Corp. highlights its strategic pivot toward AI infrastructure, positioning the company as more than just a Bitcoin miner. The focus includes its $35 billion Anthropic deal’s potential to expand growth opportunities, the sale of its Canadian managed cloud business to Opti9 Technologies, and the broader shift toward monetizing power and data-center assets. While Bitcoin-related performance remains a backdrop, the company’s evolving role in AI-driven cloud solutions dominates headlines.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Hut 8 Corp.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 5 vs. 5 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
21
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
31
Technical
65
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-27%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
21
Narrative Gap
+41
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant **Confirmation Bias** (score 49) reflects a disconnect between optimistic narratives and weaker fundamentals—revenue growth is flat (+0.4%) while margins shrink (-4.2pp). Meanwhile, **FOMO** (42) and **Loss Aversion** (41) coexist: traders chase momentum (+7.8% ROC) but hesitate to exit after a recent pullback. The key tension lies in whether the narrative gap (70 vs. 21) will widen further or if fundamentals force a re-evaluation. Overconfidence (23) hints at traders prioritizing short-term gains over long-term sustainability.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Hut 8 Corp. (NASDAQ:HUT) is increasingly positioning itself as an AI infrastructure company rather than simply a Bitcoin miner"
"Druckenmiller's family office bought $125.6 million of Bitcoin miners"
"multi-year colocation agreement, enabling Opti9 to operate its cloud infrastructure at Hut 8's Canadian data centers"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two stark camps: those leaning cautiously optimistic and those outright dismissive. The more bullish approaches—like the **efficient-market** view (60) and **Mackay’s** crowd psychology (60)—suggest it may have some speculative appeal, either as a market-neutral play or due to rising investor enthusiasm. Meanwhile, **Fisher (45)**, **Marks (45)**, and **Livermore (45)** see it as a mixed bag, with decent fundamentals but already high expectations or unclear momentum. The rest of the methodologies, however, paint a far bleaker picture: **Loeb (22)**, **Bagehot (20)**, and **Schwager (19)** all flag severe risks—whether liquidity concerns, volatility, or a lack of disciplined setups—while **Graham (2)** and **Housel (0)** reject it entirely, calling it statistically overvalued or too volatile for patient investors. The divide reflects a tension between speculative potential and fundamental caution, with only a handful of frameworks seeing any merit.
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 41
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 35
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 22
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 20
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 2
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
54.2%
Operating Margin
-136.9%
Net Margin
-96.2%
EBITDA Margin
-93.6%
ROE
-15.9%
ROA
-8.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.14
Cash
$44.91M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.09
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$13.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.40
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 10 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Trefis · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Coinage Coop · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HUT currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HUT's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 44.8%; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -136.9% (negative); Net margin: -96.2% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for HUT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 18,616 | -5,807 | $78.70 |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 17,978 | -638 | $79.33 |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 5,807 | -5,807 | $78.70 |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 638 | -638 | $79.33 |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 24,423 | +12,355 | — |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 12,355 | -12,355 | — |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 12,355 | -12,355 | — |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 21.8.2026 | 12,355 | +12,355 | — |
| Semah Victor | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $125.00 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 4,449 | -4,449 | $117.69 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 914 | -914 | $116.80 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 2,348 | -2,348 | $118.76 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 8 | -8 | $119.44 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 17,324 | -914 | $116.80 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 12,875 | -4,449 | $117.69 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 10,527 | -2,348 | $118.76 |
| Flinn Joseph | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 10,519 | -8 | $119.44 |
| Wilkinson Amy Marie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 15,713 | +15,713 | — |
| Wilkinson Amy Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 4,550 | +4,550 | — |
| Glennan Sean Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 27,229 | +27,229 | — |
| Flinn Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 4,595 | +4,595 | — |
| Semah Victor | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 27,229 | +27,229 | — |
| Wilkinson Amy Marie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 15,713 | -15,713 | — |
| Flinn Joseph | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 23,000 | +23,000 | — |
| Rickertsen Rick | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 4,372 | +4,372 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,878,375 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,397,143 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology