Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$33.43
▼ $0.44 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/25 12:20 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$33.42 - $33.77
52-Week Range
$22.66 - $37.31
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$33.17
Resistance
$37.31
+36.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 24.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.11
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 4, 2026
Then
70
$36.11
Now
57
$33.43
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
26
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
67
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (Class B Common) is limited and primarily indirect, focusing on comparisons with other financial stocks rather than the company itself. Most headlines pertain to unrelated topics—such as trade tensions, commodity markets, or a different company (HydroGraph Clean Power) with a similar ticker symbol (HG)—rather than Hamilton Insurance. No direct news about the company’s performance, strategy, or financial updates has been reported in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. Class B Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
67
Technical
26
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a narrative-reality gap (66 vs. 40) where euphoric sentiment (21) and herding (31) dominate, despite neutral momentum and moderate FOMO (12). Investors appear to be chasing peers and overvaluing recent gains, while anchoring (16) may reinforce support-level fixation. The key question is whether this speculative momentum can sustain itself or if a peer-driven pullback will test the 4.2% support gap. Overconfidence (2) hints at potential complacency, but low panic (1) and loss aversion (0) suggest no immediate defensive reactions.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"How Hamilton Insurance (HG) and Assurant (AIZ) have performed compared to their sector so far this year."
"HydroGraph Clean Power Inc. recently reported its third-quarter and nine-month 2026 results, showing modest sales of US$46,561 for the quarter and a wider net loss of US$4.46 million."
"Morgan Stanley analyst Bob Huang maintains Hamilton Insurance Group (NYSE:HG) with an Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $34 to $37."
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 31/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and Benjamin Graham’s Defensive Investor all rate it near-perfectly, seeing it as a high-quality, undervalued growth candidate or exceptional business—aligning with their focus on fundamentals, long-term potential, and price-to-growth misalignment. Meanwhile, more cautious or market-savvy frameworks like Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Jack Schwager’s trend-following discipline flag it as late-cycle or lacking a clear setup, suggesting overvaluation or speculative hype. Even the Enterprising Graham Investor and Veblen’s value-creation lens still see merit, but the contrast with the efficient-market camp—dismissing it as unpickable—highlights whether this is a rare stock with structural advantages or just another crowded trade. The middle ground, like Gerald Loeb’s capital-preservation or Morgan Housel’s patient compounder, acknowledges its merits but tempers enthusiasm with risk awareness.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 88
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 78
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 74
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 70
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 52
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$33.17
Range Bottom
$37.31
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
23.4%
Net Margin
19.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
20.4%
ROA
6.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.75
Cash
$1.06B
Total Debt
$149.74M
Current Ratio
0.11
Debt/Equity
0.05
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 6.3.2026 | $2.000 |
| 5.3.2026 | $2.000 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$28.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$27.62
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Investing.com · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
Investing.com · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Investing.com · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 30.8.2026
Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. Class B Common (HG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HG currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HG's technical score is 26/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 24.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 51.2%; Net income growth: 37.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.11; Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — HG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duffin Timothy James | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2026 | 194,959 | -28,500 | $34.69 |
| Duffin Timothy James | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 223,459 | -28,500 | $34.53 |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 400,000 | -50,000 | $36.12 |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $36.12 |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 0 | -100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,430 | +100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 1,086,245 | -100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 985,815 | -100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,430 | -100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,430 | +100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,430 | -100,430 | — |
| Albo Giuseppina | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 100,430 | -100,430 | — |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 37,300 | -37,300 | $32.16 |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 450,000 | -37,300 | $32.16 |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 12,700 | -12,700 | $31.82 |
| BROWN DAVID A | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 487,300 | -12,700 | $31.82 |
| Levenson Jonathan B. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 6,075 | -6,075 | $30.61 |
| Levenson Jonathan B. | Open Market Sale | 13.5.2026 | 39,629 | -6,075 | $30.61 |
| Levenson Jonathan B. | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 3,030 | -3,030 | $30.67 |
| Levenson Jonathan B. | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 45,704 | -3,030 | $30.67 |
| Priebe David | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 4,929 | +4,929 | — |
| Wilson Peter W | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 4,929 | +4,929 | — |
| Simmons Everard Barclay | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 4,929 | +4,929 | — |
| Patterson Alan Neil | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 4,929 | +4,929 | — |
| Deegan Brian John | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 11,000 | -11,000 | $30.69 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,296,171 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,296,461 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology