Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$21.98
▲ $0.54 (+2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/17 11:23 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$11.09B
Day Range
$21.39 - $22.06
52-Week Range
$17.79 - $28.10
Beta
—
Next Earnings
07.12.2026
GME is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-17.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $18.27 vs. price $21.98 (-16.9%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
80
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
51
Institutional
43
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of GameStop Corporation has centered on its strong fiscal second-quarter 2026 earnings, which exceeded analyst expectations with adjusted EPS of $0.27 and revenue of $790.2 million, despite an 18.7% year-over-year revenue decline. The company’s profit surged to $298.7 million, driven by a 57% spike in collectibles sales, particularly trading cards, as it capitalizes on the booming $100 billion collectibles market. GameStop also raised its full-year outlook and highlighted a major director’s stock purchase following the earnings beat.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about GameStop Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 20 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
59
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
51
Technical
80
Valuation
38
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
92
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+51
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests FOMO dominates, fueled by strong momentum, elevated volume, and extreme positive sentiment. The narrative gap (+28) aligns with confirmation bias, where investors prioritize hype over fundamentals. Overconfidence is present but muted by the stock’s underperformance relative to its 200-day average. The key open question is whether the momentum-driven buying will sustain or if reality (weak revenue) will eventually curb the narrative-driven enthusiasm. Loss aversion remains a minor but persistent undercurrent, given the recent price decline.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:53 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"adjusted earnings per share of $0.27 beating the consensus estimate of $0.19"
"57% surge in sales of collectibles"
"net income of $298.7 million in its fiscal second quarter, up from $168.6 million a year earlier"
"full-year outlook raised"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The higher scores from Bagehot, Schwager and Lynch reflect their emphasis on liquidity, disciplined risk/reward setups and growth potential, leading those models to view GME as financially resilient and undervalued relative to its growth narrative. In contrast, Graham, Smith and Nelson assign low scores because their criteria focus on margin of safety, long‑term stability and cyclical overbought conditions, which GME does not satisfy according to their documented standards. Mid‑range scores from Marks, Veblen and the market‑cycle perspective capture a mixed view, acknowledging a solid business but also recognizing that expectations may already be priced in. Overall, the divergence stems from each methodology’s weighted priorities—liquidity and growth versus valuation discipline and cyclical risk—resulting in a spectrum of cautious assessments rather than a uniform recommendation.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 77
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 55
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 44
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 1
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
33.0%
Operating Margin
6.4%
Net Margin
11.5%
EBITDA Margin
6.4%
ROE
7.7%
ROA
4.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.93
Cash
$6.30B
Total Debt
$4.16B
Current Ratio
15.30
Debt/Equity
0.76
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$18.27
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-16.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $567.43M | $520.58M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $549.70M | $462.67M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $542.83M | $419.17M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $546.22M | $386.96M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $559.88M | $363.88M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$597.30M
Terminal Value
$8.83B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.74B
Enterprise Value
$7.89B
Net Debt
$-2.14B
Equity Value
$10.03B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 20 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Motley Fool · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
MarketBeat · 12.9.2026
Benzinga · 12.9.2026
Benzinga · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Motley Fool · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GameStop Corporation (GME) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 64/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GME currently scores 64/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GME's estimated fair value is $18.27, which is 16.9% below the current price of $21.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GME's technical score is 80/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 133.3%; Free cash flow growth: 360.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $18.27 vs. price $21.98 (-16.9%); Calmar: 0.11 (3y annualized return 7.3% / max drawdown 63.3%); Revenue growth (last year): -5.1%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GME.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 9 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attal Alain | Open Market Purchase | 10.9.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $20.00 |
| Cohen Ryan | Open Market Purchase | 10.9.2026 | 1,000,000 | +1,000,000 | $20.38 |
| Grube James | Open Market Purchase | 9.9.2026 | 10,255 | +10,255 | $19.12 |
| Cheng Lawrence | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 55,000 | +55,000 | $18.80 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 3,957 | -3,957 | $22.62 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 104,190 | -3,957 | $22.62 |
| Moore Daniel William | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 7,085 | -7,085 | $22.38 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 7,083 | -7,083 | $22.38 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 108,147 | -7,083 | $22.38 |
| Moore Daniel William | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 115,125 | -7,085 | $22.38 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 13.4.2026 | 3,912 | -3,912 | $23.19 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 13.4.2026 | 115,230 | -3,912 | $23.19 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 7,209 | -7,209 | $22.94 |
| Moore Daniel William | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 21,196 | +21,196 | $23.59 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 21,196 | +21,196 | $23.59 |
| Moore Daniel William | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 7,210 | -7,210 | $22.94 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 97,946 | -7,209 | $22.94 |
| Robinson Mark Haymond | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 119,142 | +21,196 | $23.59 |
| Moore Daniel William | Open Market Sale | 1.4.2026 | 101,014 | -7,210 | $22.94 |
| Moore Daniel William | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 122,210 | +21,196 | $23.59 |
| Cheng Lawrence | Open Market Purchase | 23.1.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $22.87 |
| Cheng Lawrence | Open Market Purchase | 23.1.2026 | 88,000 | +5,000 | $22.87 |
| Attal Alain | Open Market Purchase | 21.1.2026 | 12,000 | +12,000 | $21.63 |
| Cohen Ryan | Open Market Purchase | 21.1.2026 | 500,000 | +500,000 | $21.60 |
| Attal Alain | Open Market Purchase | 21.1.2026 | 596,464 | +12,000 | $21.63 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
56,990,026 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 53,736,062 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology