Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$9.46
▼ $0.22 (-2.3%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:02 AM
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$351.78M
Day Range
$9.42 - $9.74
52-Week Range
$6.12 - $10.55
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$8.41
Resistance
$9.90
GASS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+33.1% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 6/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
66
Risk
50
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of StealthGas, Inc. (GASS) has highlighted its strong financial performance in Q2 2026, despite a smaller fleet and lower revenue compared to prior periods. Key themes include record profitability—with net income rising to $17.3 million—thanks to strategic fleet downsizing, debt elimination, and improved cost efficiency. The company also achieved a debt-free status and a record cash position exceeding $250 million, positioning itself resiliently amid geopolitical market challenges in liquefied petroleum gas shipping.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about StealthGas, Inc.. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
15
Fundamentals
—
Technical
66
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for GASS suggests a **tentative, conflicted psychological state**—neither FOMO nor panic dominates outright, but elevated volume and volatility hint at cautious speculation. The near-equal narrative-reality gap (-1) implies no extreme misalignment, yet the lack of a dominant state reflects uncertainty. Key open questions include whether the volume spike reflects speculative interest or profit-taking, and if peers’ underperformance will trigger further passive herding. The absence of extreme bias (e.g., euphoria or panic) suggests traders are cautiously assessing momentum without clear conviction.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:16 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Fleet downsizing and debt elimination drive 40% profit margins despite lower revenue."
"achieving zero debt and over $250 million in liquidity"
"maintained profitability despite lower revenue than a year earlier"
"navigating geopolitical disruptions in the LPG shipping market"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between the top-tier methodologies and the rest reveals a deep divide in how GASS is evaluated. Thorstein Veblen, Charles Mackay, and Samuel Armstrong Nelson all score above 70, suggesting a consensus that the stock aligns with value creation, avoids speculative bubbles, and sits in a favorable cycle position—likely due to its perceived stability or undervalued fundamentals. In contrast, the mid-tier approaches—like Howard Marks’ cautious mixed verdict and Gerald Loeb’s moderate risk assessment—highlight concerns about inflated expectations or structural risks, while the lower-scoring models (from Livermore’s trend resistance to Housel’s volatility warning) paint a picture of instability or poor technical alignment. The lack of definitive data for Graham, Fisher, or Lynch further underscores the ambiguity, leaving only the most qualitative or cyclical frameworks confident in the stock’s merits.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 24
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Motley Fool · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Moby · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
MarketBeat · 2.9.2026
Associated Press · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for StealthGas, Inc. (GASS) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for GASS specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
GASS's technical score is 66/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 53.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; ROC 12 days: -1.6%; CMF 20 days: -0.11.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GASS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 12 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | — |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $6.01 |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $6.43 |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 57,000 | +5,000 | $6.43 |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 67,000 | +10,000 | $6.01 |
| Jolliffe Michael | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 0 | -10,000 | — |
| Vafias Harry | Gift | 29.4.2026 | 99,623 | +99,623 | — |
| Vafias Harry | Gift | 29.4.2026 | 4,480,863 | +99,623 | — |
| Vafias Harry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.4.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Vafias Harry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.4.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | $6.01 |
| Vafias Harry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.4.2026 | 4,381,240 | +100,000 | $6.01 |
| Vafias Harry | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.4.2026 | 0 | -100,000 | — |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2019 | 39,125 | +39,125 | $3.50 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 28.6.2019 | 6,502 | +6,502 | $3.40 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 27.6.2019 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $3.36 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 19.3.2019 | 422,065 | +422,065 | $3.30 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 15.3.2019 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $3.05 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 14.3.2019 | 3,200 | +3,200 | $3.05 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2019 | 18,000 | +18,000 | $3.09 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2019 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $3.09 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 8.3.2019 | 2,400 | +2,400 | $3.06 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 7.3.2019 | 3,600 | +3,600 | $3.11 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 6.3.2019 | 493,536 | +493,536 | $3.20 |
| Glendon Capital Management LP | Open Market Purchase | 5.3.2019 | 19,998 | +19,998 | $3.25 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
47,336 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 49,839 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
23.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology