Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$39.74
▲ $0.50 (+1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/26 08:07 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$1.11B
Day Range
$39.25 - $39.88
52-Week Range
$29.95 - $42.34
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$33.12
Resistance
$41.33
+0.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/20 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $68.66 vs. price $39.74 (+72.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 31.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
70/100
Similarity
6
Historical Matches
67/100
Analog Quality
-1.0%
Median 40D Outcome
74/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+5.7% … +7.2%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
67%
-5.4% … -3.2%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 6 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 10%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -2.7%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 33% (10%–70%) | -2.2% | -6.5% … +2.8% | -0.0% |
| 10D | 33% (10%–70%) | -1.1% | -3.9% … +2.7% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 33% (10%–70%) | -2.7% | -4.7% … +3.2% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 33% (10%–70%) | -1.0% | -2.7% … +8.6% | +2.4% |
| 60D | 67% (30%–90%) | +4.5% | -2.8% … +8.3% | +5.7% |
Sample size: 6 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | 70/100 | Uptrend | -6.4% | -11.0% |
| 2026-05-08 | 68/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.7% | +7.3% |
| 2026-03-26 | 67/100 | Consolidation | +4.9% | +1.6% |
| 2026-06-05 | 64/100 | Downtrend | +8.0% | +10.4% |
| 2026-06-22 | 60/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -5.0% | +8.6% |
| 2026-03-06 | 55/100 | Consolidation | -1.7% | -4.3% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity.
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
No data available
Value
67
Momentum
45
Risk
42
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
46
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about FirstSun Capital Bancorp. News trend score: 38. Reason: 3 of the last 4 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
5
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
46
Technical
45
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
26
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-24
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 23/100
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 99
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 97
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 66
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 65
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 56
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 41
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.5%
ROA
1.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.52
Cash
$652.59M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$39.74
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$68.66
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+72.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $114.37M | $104.93M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $123.66M | $104.09M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $131.39M | $101.46M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $137.14M | $97.15M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $140.57M | $91.36M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$103.97M
Terminal Value
$2.22B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.44B
Enterprise Value
$1.94B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.94B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$40.83
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$37.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 4 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
ChartMill · 27.7.2026
FirstSun Capital Bancorp (FSUN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FSUN currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FSUN's estimated fair value is $68.66, which is 72.8% above the current price of $39.74. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FSUN's technical score is 45/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $68.66 vs. price $39.74 (+72.8%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 29.0%; Net income growth: 29.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 31.4%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -2.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FSUN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELVING BEVERLY O | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 13,439 | +7,553 | $19.72 |
| ELVING BEVERLY O | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.8.2026 | 8,934 | -4,505 | $40.88 |
| ELVING BEVERLY O | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 0 | -7,553 | — |
| Fleshood John | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 5,902 | +2,099 | — |
| Edelson Sam | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 4,239 | +2,099 | — |
| Cohn Spencer | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 2,099 | +2,099 | — |
| ELVING BEVERLY O | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 3,852 | +2,099 | — |
| Levy David W | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 9,208 | +2,099 | — |
| MACKOVAK BENJAMIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 4,239 | +2,099 | — |
| Parker C. Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 4,239 | +2,099 | — |
| MURPHY PETER E | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 2,149 | +2,099 | — |
| CARTER MOLLIE H | Gift | 20.5.2026 | 0 | -5,165 | — |
| ARNOLD NEAL E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 329,750 | -10,914 | $36.46 |
| ARNOLD NEAL E | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 303,714 | +30,170 | — |
| ARNOLD NEAL E | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 340,664 | +36,950 | — |
| SHAFER THOMAS C | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 80,415 | +80,415 | — |
| MACKOVAK BENJAMIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 2,140 | +2,140 | — |
| CARTER MOLLIE H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 5,165 | -1,691 | $36.46 |
| Hammond Kevin T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 30 | +30 | — |
| Frazier Laura J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 13,646 | +5,485 | — |
| Cafera Robert A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 151,159 | +6,333 | — |
| Cafera Robert A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 144,826 | +9,600 | — |
| Cafera Robert A | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 148,622 | -2,537 | $36.46 |
| Parker C. Allen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 2,140 | +2,140 | — |
| Norris Jennifer | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 12,503 | +5,485 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,305,607 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,207,877 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology