Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$303.65
▼ $2.23 (-0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:17 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$71.84B
Day Range
$302.00 - $306.63
52-Week Range
$180.99 - $345.37
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.12.2026
Support
$299.38
Resistance
$341.69
FDX is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+66.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
90/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
93/100
Analog Quality
+7.7%
Median 40D Outcome
53/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
60%
+3.3% … +14.7%
🟡 Base
20%
-0.2% … +0.6%
🔴 Bearish
20%
-7.4% … -3.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 60% (95% CI 36%–80%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +2.7%.
Echo #1 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 0% historical success
Echo #2 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.0% | -0.2% … +3.2% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.6% | -2.2% … +5.9% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 60% (36%–80%) | +2.7% | -0.2% … +9.3% | +1.2% |
| 40D | 60% (36%–80%) | +7.7% | -1.9% … +16.0% | +1.4% |
| 60D | 60% (36%–80%) | +8.9% | -5.4% … +15.0% | +1.8% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-18 | 90/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +3.3% | -10.6% |
| 2023-10-19 | 88/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +4.8% | +0.0% |
| 2021-08-06 | 88/100 | Consolidation | -3.7% | -14.7% |
| 2024-12-18 | 87/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +0.9% | -9.5% |
| 2024-05-08 | 85/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -3.0% | +9.7% |
| 2018-09-27 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -11.2% | -36.6% |
| 2018-02-14 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +2.7% | +4.2% |
| 2026-03-27 | 83/100 | Consolidation | +12.8% | +14.3% |
| 2023-05-31 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +14.7% | +18.7% |
| 2024-06-14 | 81/100 | Downtrend | +27.2% | +15.6% |
| 2024-08-12 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.7% | -1.3% |
| 2023-09-18 | 81/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -0.7% | +9.5% |
| 2024-05-28 | 80/100 | Downtrend | +19.4% | +18.6% |
| 2024-01-30 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +0.2% | +8.9% |
| 2026-03-13 | 77/100 | Uptrend | +5.7% | +17.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
19
Risk
42
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
46
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING FDX...
Recent media coverage of FedEx has centered on its financial outlook and operational challenges. Analysts like JPMorgan and HSBC have adjusted price targets for FedEx and its subsidiary FedEx Freight, reflecting optimism about post-spin performance and growth potential. Meanwhile, a new lawsuit alleges safety failures in driver oversight following a fatal truck crash, raising concerns about operational risks. Despite a 78% stock rally, some analysts still view the stock as undervalued, though valuation debates persist.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about FedEx. News trend score: 86. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
72
Fundamentals
46
Technical
19
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-7%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
FDX’s psychology profile reflects a **neutral, cautious market behavior** with no dominant state, as all scores remain low. The slight **herding** (30) and **anchoring** (5) signals suggest traders are passively aligning with peers while holding near support, but momentum and sentiment lack extreme bias. The **narrative gap** (10-point divergence) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and reality, though no clear overreaction or underreaction is evident. The key question: *Will the stock’s underperformance relative to peers persist, or will it break free as fundamentals improve?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:43 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"JPMorgan Adjusts Price Target on FedEx to $400 From $460, Maintains Overweight Rating"
"FedEx stock has rallied strongly... yet several valuation checks still point to room between the current share price and an intrinsic value estimate"
"FedEx Faces New Lawsuit Over Truck Crash Allegations — claims serious operational failures in driver oversight and safety practices"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for FDX reflects deep methodological divides between investors prioritizing cyclical timing and those focused on fundamental value or growth. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock sits in a favorable cycle position, closer to oversold than overbought, while Charles Mackay’s near-agreement implies no speculative mania is distorting the price. In stark contrast, Benjamin Graham and Philip Fisher’s low scores reveal a stock that fails their rigorous defensive and quality/growth criteria, respectively—highlighting a disconnect between cyclical optimism and traditional value or growth investing. Meanwhile, the middle-ground methodologies (like Marks’ mixed verdict or Malkiel & Bogle’s skepticism) underscore the stock’s lack of clear edge, balancing moderate risk with weak evidence for outperformance. The debate hinges on whether FDX’s cyclical appeal outweighs its fundamental shortcomings or vice versa.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 56
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 50
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 45
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 34
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 29
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 20
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$299.38
Range Bottom
$341.69
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
5.8%
Net Margin
4.7%
EBITDA Margin
10.4%
ROE
14.0%
ROA
4.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$18.71
Cash
$13.31B
Total Debt
$24.04B
Current Ratio
1.48
Debt/Equity
0.76
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $1.220 |
| 21.6.2026 | $1.220 |
| 9.3.2026 | $1.168 |
| 8.3.2026 | $1.168 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.168 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.168 |
| 8.9.2025 | $1.168 |
| 7.9.2025 | $1.168 |
| 23.6.2025 | $1.168 |
| 22.6.2025 | $1.168 |
| 10.3.2025 | $1.112 |
| 9.3.2025 | $1.112 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$132.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$103.60
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
FedEx (FDX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FDX currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
FDX's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 10.4%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.40 (3y annualized return 14.7% / max drawdown 36.8%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — FDX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellison Marvin R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 13,903 | +5,042 | $137.85 |
| Ellison Marvin R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 11,806 | -2,097 | $331.45 |
| Ellison Marvin R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 0 | -5,042 | — |
| Ellison Marvin R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.8.2026 | 2,097 | -2,097 | $331.45 |
| Ellison Marvin R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 5,042 | +5,042 | $137.85 |
| Ellison Marvin R | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 28.8.2026 | 5,042 | -5,042 | — |
| Talwar Vishal | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 1,489 | +1,489 | — |
| Smith Richard W | Other Transaction | 7.8.2026 | 253,927 | -253,927 | — |
| WALSH PAUL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.6.2026 | 5,042 | -5,042 | — |
| WALSH PAUL S | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 5,042 | -5,042 | $324.56 |
| WALSH PAUL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.6.2026 | 5,042 | +5,042 | $137.85 |
| WALSH PAUL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.6.2026 | 21,401 | +5,042 | $137.85 |
| WALSH PAUL S | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 16,359 | -5,042 | $324.56 |
| WALSH PAUL S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 30.6.2026 | 0 | -5,042 | — |
| Smith Richard W | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 4,734 | +4,734 | — |
| ADAMS GINA F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 4,734 | +4,734 | — |
| Russ Claude F | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 792 | +792 | — |
| Carere Brie | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 4,734 | +4,734 | — |
| Subramaniam Rajesh | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 10,999 | +10,999 | — |
| ADAMS GINA F. | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 3,567 | +3,567 | — |
| Preet Kawal | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 3,567 | +3,567 | — |
| Carere Brie | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 3,567 | +3,567 | — |
| Talwar Vishal | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 3,567 | +3,567 | — |
| Preet Kawal | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 4,734 | +4,734 | — |
| Talwar Vishal | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 4,734 | +4,734 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,693,080 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,079,490 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
44.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology