Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$2.69
▲ $0.07 (+2.7%)
Market data updated: 09/23 08:19 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$2.70M
Day Range
$2.59 - $2.78
52-Week Range
$1.75 - $53.20
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$1.75
Resistance
$4.60
-91.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$9.94 vs. price $2.69 (-469.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
27
Risk
40
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
25
Institutional
17
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Reliance Global Group, Inc. has centered on two key developments: the company’s adoption of a one-year stockholder rights plan in early September 2026, aimed at protecting shareholder value amid concerns over undervaluation, and its agreement to sell Altruis Benefit Consulting for $11 million in cash, announced in August 2026. The rights plan was unanimously approved by the board, while the asset sale reflects strategic divestment. No broader operational or financial trends are detailed in the available sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Reliance Global Group, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
25
Technical
27
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
EZRA’s psychology is dominated by loss aversion, reflecting a 20.4% drop over three months and subdued trading volume. The narrative gap (+44) and confirmation bias (ignoring weak fundamentals) suggest investors cling to optimistic narratives despite deteriorating metrics. Overconfidence in momentum (+17.9% ROC vs. EPS growth) may mask underlying concerns, but the dominant reluctance to buy—despite positive sentiment—points to a defensive stance. The key question: *Will the recent pullback (-20.4%) finally trigger a shift from loss aversion to FOMO, or will fundamentals erode further?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Board believes the value of the Company’s assets is well in excess of its current market capitalization, and adopted the rights plan to protect that value for all stockholders."
"Reliance Global Group Signs LOI to Sell Altruis Benefit Consulting for $11 Million in Cash"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between cautious and dismissive views on EZRA, reflecting stark differences in their core principles. On one end, Schwager’s neutral stance and Lynch’s mixed but growth-positive verdict suggest a nuanced assessment—growth exists, but valuation may already price it in. Meanwhile, Marks and the Efficient Market camp lean toward mixed but not compelling, emphasizing either high expectations or weak evidence for outperformance. In contrast, the more conservative voices—like Graham, Loeb, and Housel—pile up warnings: Graham sees it as too risky, Loeb flags capital-threatening volatility, and Housel’s low score highlights the kind of turbulence that scares patient investors. Even the cyclical and liquidity-focused models (Marks-cycle, Bagehot) land in the middle or below, while Fisher’s near-zero score underscores a complete lack of the quality/growth traits he demanded. The debate hinges on whether EZRA’s potential is worth the risk or if its price already reflects the hype.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 54
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 47
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 44
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 24
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 13
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-72.5%
Net Margin
-56.2%
EBITDA Margin
-61.8%
ROE
-108.7%
ROA
-51.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.28
Cash
—
Total Debt
$5.10M
Current Ratio
1.78
Debt/Equity
0.79
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.10.2025 | $1.200 |
| 29.10.2025 | $1.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.69
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$9.94
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-469.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5% | $-3.19M | $-2.93M |
| 2 | 2.5% | $-3.27M | $-2.75M |
| 3 | 2.5% | $-3.35M | $-2.59M |
| 4 | 2.5% | $-3.43M | $-2.43M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-3.52M | $-2.29M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-3.11M
Terminal Value
$-55.52M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-36.08M
Enterprise Value
$-49.07M
Net Debt
$5.10M
Equity Value
$-54.17M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.18
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.32
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 12 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
ChartMill · 3.8.2026
ChartMill · 3.8.2026
Associated Press · 3.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 3.8.2026
ChartMill · 3.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
ChartMill · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.7.2026
ChartMill · 21.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.7.2026
Reliance Global Group, Inc. (EZRA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EZRA currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, EZRA's estimated fair value is -$9.94, which is 469.4% below the current price of $2.69. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
EZRA's technical score is 27/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 85.8%; Net income growth: 23.0%; Current ratio: 1.78.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$9.94 vs. price $2.69 (-469.4%); Operating margin: -72.5% (negative); Net margin: -56.2% (negative).
Yes — EZRA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyman Ezra | Open Market Purchase | 26.3.2026 | 300,000 | +300,000 | $0.17 |
| Beyman Ezra | Open Market Purchase | 26.3.2026 | 959,300 | +300,000 | $0.17 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 24.3.2026 | 127,562 | -127,562 | $0.21 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 24.3.2026 | 128 | -127,562 | $0.21 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 26.11.2025 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $0.66 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 26.11.2025 | 127,690 | -25,000 | $0.66 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2025 | 44,082 | -44,082 | $0.82 |
| Beyman Ezra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 289,780 | -289,780 | $0.87 |
| Markovits Joel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 93,808 | -93,808 | $0.87 |
| Beyman Yaakov | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 75,140 | -75,140 | $0.87 |
| Beyman Ezra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 659,300 | -289,780 | $0.87 |
| Beyman Yaakov | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 159,473 | -75,140 | $0.87 |
| Markovits Joel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2025 | 196,772 | -93,808 | $0.87 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2025 | 152,690 | -44,082 | $0.82 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2025 | 30,255 | -30,255 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2025 | 290,580 | -30,255 | $0.88 |
| Beyman Ezra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 9,043 | -9,043 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 6,717 | -6,717 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2025 | 155 | -155 | $0.88 |
| Beyman Yaakov | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 2,181 | -2,181 | $0.88 |
| Beyman Ezra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 949,080 | -9,043 | $0.88 |
| Beyman Yaakov | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 234,613 | -2,181 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2025 | 320,990 | -6,717 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2025 | 320,835 | -155 | $0.88 |
| Markovits Joel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2025 | 15,816 | -15,816 | $0.95 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
51,669 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 44,189 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology