Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$1.74
▲ $0.08 (+4.8%)
Market data updated: 09/23 09:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$154.61M
Day Range
$1.73 - $1.76
52-Week Range
$1.26 - $17.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$1.46
Resistance
$1.76
ELME is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-89.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $5.98 vs. price $1.74 (+243.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -59.2% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $1.74
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 4 to 43 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
67
Momentum
66
Risk
42
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
28
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Elme Communities has centered on its liquidation of its multifamily property portfolio, with key updates including the sale of six properties in 2026 and a final deal for its last asset at $250 million. The company has revised its estimated liquidation payout range to $16.41–$16.61 per share, targeting completion of remaining sales in Q3 2026, while investors react to progress and share price movements. Earlier reports noted delays in the selloff process.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Elme Communities. News trend score: 44. Reason: 2 of the last 11 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
32
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
28
Technical
66
Valuation
67
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
33
Fundamental Reality
32
Narrative Gap
+1
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ELME’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (1.8%) suggests traders are fixating on this level despite a valuation gap of -72% to DCF. Loss aversion (score 50) and overconfidence (20) coexist, with traders possibly holding due to recent declines while ignoring extreme undervaluation. FOMO (20) is muted by weak volume (0.91x avg) and neutral sentiment, while herding is minimal given the stock’s slight underperformance vs. peers. The key question: *Will traders break free from anchoring at resistance, or will loss aversion keep them anchored despite the valuation?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:56 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"final proceeds projected above today’s share price by Q4 2026"
"reaches agreement to sell last remaining asset"
"Elme Communities shares climb after updating liquidation payout outlook"
"Targets completion of all remaining sales during the third quarter"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 3/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each investor, the model estimates that value‑oriented frameworks such as Graham’s defensive criteria, Mackay’s crowd‑sentiment filter, and Marks’ cycle analysis all assign very high scores to ELME, indicating they view it as attractive or fairly priced in the current market phase. In contrast, growth‑focused or efficiency‑centric approaches—Lynch, Fisher, Veblen, and the efficient‑market duo—give the stock minimal scores, reflecting concerns that the company fails to meet their growth‑at‑reasonable‑price or quality thresholds. Mid‑range scores from Loeb, Nelson, Smith, Schwager, and Housel suggest a moderate risk profile, neither a clear buy nor a strong sell, aligning with their more balanced risk‑adjusted or hold‑ability lenses. These divergent outcomes arise mainly from the differing weight each methodology places on valuation certainty, growth narrative, and market‑cycle positioning rather than any change in the underlying data.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 84
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 3
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 4 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
62.9%
Operating Margin
-59.2%
Net Margin
-74.7%
EBITDA Margin
-21.3%
ROE
-17.4%
ROA
—
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.75
Cash
$6.59M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.1.2026 | $14.670 |
| 7.1.2026 | $14.670 |
| 17.9.2025 | $0.180 |
| 16.9.2025 | $0.180 |
| 17.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.180 |
| 19.3.2025 | $0.180 |
| 18.3.2025 | $0.180 |
| 19.12.2024 | $0.180 |
| 18.12.2024 | $0.180 |
| 19.9.2024 | $0.180 |
| 18.9.2024 | $0.180 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.74
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$5.98
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+243.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
0.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1% | $35.35M | $32.43M |
| 2 | 0.7% | $35.60M | $29.96M |
| 3 | 1.3% | $36.06M | $27.85M |
| 4 | 1.9% | $36.75M | $26.03M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $37.67M | $24.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$35.32M
Terminal Value
$593.98M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$386.05M
Enterprise Value
$526.81M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$526.81M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$10.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.07
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 11 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.7.2026
Multifamily Dive · 27.7.2026
InvestorsHub · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.7.2026
ChartMill · 24.7.2026
Benzinga · 24.7.2026
Multifamily Dive · 25.6.2026
MT Newswires · 25.6.2026
Multifamily Dive · 29.5.2026
Elme Communities (ELME) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 47/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ELME currently scores 47/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ELME's estimated fair value is $5.98, which is 243.7% above the current price of $1.74. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ELME's technical score is 66/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $5.98 vs. price $1.74 (+243.7%); Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -59.2% (negative); Net margin: -74.7% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — ELME has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butcher Benjamin S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| Carras Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| BANNER JENNIFER S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| Goitia Ellen M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| Sturzenegger Ron D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| Winns Anthony L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| NOLAN THOMAS H JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 2,883 | +2,883 | — |
| BANNER JENNIFER S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 35,167 | +2,883 | — |
| Butcher Benjamin S | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 99,013 | +2,883 | — |
| Carras Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 14,122 | +2,883 | — |
| Goitia Ellen M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 47,851 | +2,883 | — |
| NOLAN THOMAS H JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 60,359 | +2,883 | — |
| Sturzenegger Ron D. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 5,209 | +2,883 | — |
| Winns Anthony L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.12.2025 | 73,889 | +2,883 | — |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 34,105 | -34,105 | $16.61 |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 32,018 | -32,018 | $16.61 |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.11.2025 | 35,984 | +35,984 | — |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 18,557 | -18,557 | $16.61 |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.11.2025 | 52,197 | +52,197 | — |
| Butcher Tiffany Michelle | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.11.2025 | 52,197 | +52,197 | — |
| McDermott Paul T. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 71,970 | -71,970 | $16.61 |
| McDermott Paul T. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 58,427 | -58,427 | $16.61 |
| McDermott Paul T. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.11.2025 | 71,970 | -71,970 | $16.61 |
| McDermott Paul T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.11.2025 | 149,006 | +149,006 | — |
| McDermott Paul T. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.11.2025 | 120,966 | +120,966 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,424,489 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,339,593 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology