Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$21.42
▲ $0.11 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/26 01:19 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$4.89B
Day Range
$21.33 - $21.57
52-Week Range
$16.62 - $23.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$21.02
Resistance
$23.77
+17.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/21 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -34.8%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
43
Quality
No data available
Value
45
Momentum
25
Risk
50
Sentiment
8
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Eastern Bankshares, Inc. highlights mixed investor sentiment, with analysts noting both opportunities and challenges. The company’s inclusion in the Russell 2000 and participation in the Barclays conference underscores its regional banking focus, while insider sales and a recent downgrade to "Hold" reflect cautious investor reactions. Post-merger growth, particularly from acquisitions like HarborOne and Cambridge Bancorp, has drawn attention, though some analysts remain skeptical of its valuation and long-term prospects. Dividend activity and earnings call scrutiny also feature prominently.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Eastern Bankshares, Inc.. News trend score: 8. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
63
Fundamentals
51
Technical
25
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
26
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
-12
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests herding dominates, as EBC’s decline (-2.2%) aligns nearly perfectly with its peers (-2.0%), implying passive, synchronized trading. Mild anchoring (4.3% above support) may subtly reinforce this, while low FOMO/Panic scores (4/22) indicate no extreme emotional reaction. The narrative gap (-5) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals, but the key question remains: *Will this peer-driven move persist, or will individual catalysts break the herd?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:25 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Eastern Bankshares stock is downgraded to 'Hold' after a 16.7% post-merger rally (SeekingAlpha #6)"
"Recent acquisitions, notably HarborOne Bancorp and Cambridge Bancorp, have expanded their loan book (SeekingAlpha #8)"
"Eastern Bankshares Insider Sold Shares Worth $296,325 (MT Newswires #2)"
"3 Inflated Bank Stocks We Approach with Caution (StockStory #7)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for EBC reflects a clash between growth-oriented and value-driven philosophies. Top scorers like Edgar Lawrence Smith and Charles Mackay see it as a long-term, crowd-resistant opportunity, emphasizing durability and fundamental strength. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher’s high score aligns with its perceived quality, while cyclical and risk-aware investors like Samuel Nelson and Jack Schwager still find it favorably positioned—though not as aggressively as the buy-and-hold crowd. At the other end, value purists like Benjamin Graham and Peter Lynch dismiss it outright, dismissing it as either too risky or failing core valuation thresholds, while efficient-market skeptics see no clear edge over passive investing. Thorstein Veblen’s low score suggests the stock may lack the disciplined, utility-driven growth he prized, further polarizing the debate between speculative enthusiasm and cautious skepticism.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 98
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 94
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 86
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 81
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 77
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 44
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 37
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 8
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
65.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
2.0%
ROA
0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.43
Cash
$316.87M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2026 | $0.150 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.150 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 2.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 3.6.2025 | $0.130 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.130 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.120 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$21.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.88
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 7 neutral, 10 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Motley Fool · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
StockStory · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.8.2026
StockStory · 3.8.2026
StockStory · 1.8.2026
Business Wire · 30.7.2026
Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 37/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EBC currently scores 37/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EBC's technical score is 25/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; Net margin: 65.8% — strong; Revenue growth (last year): 19.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -34.8%; Net income growth: -26.2%; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — EBC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bane Richard Corey | Open Market Sale | 14.9.2026 | 198,498 | -4,000 | $21.78 |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 8,608 | -8,607 | — |
| Rosato R David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 11,358 | -11,356 | — |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 8,607 | +8,607 | — |
| Rosato R David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 18,734 | -3,354 | $22.08 |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 4,445 | -4,162 | $22.08 |
| Rosato R David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 22,088 | +11,356 | — |
| Rosato R David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 11,356 | -11,356 | — |
| Rosato R David | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 11,356 | +11,356 | — |
| Rosato R David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 3,354 | -3,354 | $22.08 |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.9.2026 | 4,162 | -4,162 | $22.08 |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 8,607 | +8,607 | — |
| SHEAHAN DENIS K | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.9.2026 | 8,607 | -8,607 | — |
| Henry Kathleen Cloherty | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 43,146 | -14,000 | $21.68 |
| Henry Kathleen Cloherty | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 14,000 | -14,000 | $21.68 |
| Antonakes Steven Louis | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 61,790 | -13,500 | $21.95 |
| Westermann Donald Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 22,565 | -10,407 | $21.77 |
| Westermann Donald Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 0 | -23,005 | $21.43 |
| Westermann Donald Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 10,407 | -10,407 | $21.77 |
| Antonakes Steven Louis | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 13,500 | -13,500 | $21.95 |
| Westermann Donald Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 23,005 | -23,005 | $21.43 |
| CASEY JOSEPH F | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 60,301 | -1,778 | $22.69 |
| CASEY JOSEPH F | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 1,778 | -1,778 | $22.69 |
| CASEY JOSEPH F | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 62,079 | -10,000 | $22.72 |
| CASEY JOSEPH F | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $22.72 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,803,681 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 15,655,151 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
72.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 74.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology