Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$128.52
▼ $1.92 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:03 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$26.74B
Day Range
$128.18 - $129.52
52-Week Range
$126.23 - $155.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$128.18
Resistance
$151.92
DTE is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-4.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 1/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.8% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.80
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
82/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
90/100
Analog Quality
+5.3%
Median 40D Outcome
78/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+3.9% … +7.1%
🟡 Base
20%
-0.1% … +0.4%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-4.4% … -2.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.3%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
6 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.7% | -0.7% … +2.8% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.9% | +0.0% … +3.3% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | +0.3% | -3.2% … +4.1% | +0.9% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +5.3% | +0.7% … +10.8% | +1.1% |
| 60D | 67% (42%–85%) | +5.3% | +0.1% … +10.9% | +1.9% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-06 | 82/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +0.6% | +5.3% |
| 2018-06-08 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +6.4% | +15.2% |
| 2018-05-17 | 74/100 | Downtrend | -2.3% | +11.5% |
| 2023-01-23 | 72/100 | Downtrend | -0.5% | -0.8% |
| 2020-09-22 | 71/100 | Consolidation | +8.3% | +10.3% |
| 2023-03-02 | 71/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +0.3% | -1.7% |
| 2023-05-25 | 71/100 | Downtrend | +3.3% | -1.9% |
| 2023-09-06 | 69/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -3.7% | +3.2% |
| 2022-06-21 | 69/100 | Downtrend | +3.7% | +11.5% |
| 2023-09-27 | 68/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -2.6% | +9.2% |
| 2025-12-19 | 68/100 | ✓ Downtrend | +7.4% | +15.3% |
| 2023-08-10 | 68/100 | ✓ Downtrend | -4.3% | -6.6% |
| 2022-10-05 | 67/100 | Downtrend | -4.4% | +1.2% |
| 2023-02-08 | 67/100 | Downtrend | -4.9% | +1.0% |
| 2024-01-24 | 67/100 | Downtrend | +4.6% | +6.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLU (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
6
Risk
36
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
42
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DTE...
Recent coverage of DTE Energy centers on its emerging role in the AI‑driven power sector, highlighted by newly signed hyperscale data‑center contracts that could reshape earnings. Analysts note the stock’s recent underperformance versus the Dow but retain a moderately optimistic outlook. The company also appears in Peter Thiel’s $419 million Q2 portfolio, which targets grid‑operator and energy‑infrastructure firms over traditional chipmakers. Dividend‑focused reports mention DTE among dividend champions, underscoring investor interest in its steady payouts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about DTE Energy. News trend score: 62. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
95
Fundamentals
42
Technical
6
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DTE’s psychology is dominated by **anchoring**, as traders appear fixated on the 2.1% proximity to support, a common behavioral anchor. Herding is secondary (score 45), likely due to the stock’s underperformance relative to peers today, but momentum and sentiment remain neutral. The narrative gap (-2) suggests slight misalignment between market perception and fundamentals, though no extreme bias (e.g., panic or euphoria) is evident. The key question: *Will traders break the anchor if support is tested, or will they hold near-term?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:00 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"BMO Capital analyst lowers DTE Energy price target to $143 from $150"
"DTE Energy (DTE) Down 4.1% Since Last Earnings Report"
📈 17D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on their documented principles, the model estimates that Nelson’s and Mackay’s high scores (100 and 91) reflect a favorable cycle position and lack of crowd mania, suggesting a relatively attractive setup. Marks’s cycle view (73) and Schwager’s disciplined reward‑risk assessment (66) are more moderate, indicating the stock is in an early‑to‑mid cycle but not overly compelling. In contrast, Graham, Bagehot, and Lynch rate the stock very low (25, 6, 5), flagging concerns about valuation, liquidity, and growth‑at‑reasonable‑price criteria. Overall, the methodologies diverge because trend‑ and cycle‑oriented investors see modest upside, while value‑ and safety‑focused investors find the risk‑adjusted case weak.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 29
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 26
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 6
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 5
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 4
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.9%
ROA
2.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$7.04
Cash
$208.00M
Total Debt
$26.19B
Current Ratio
0.80
Debt/Equity
2.13
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $1.165 |
| 21.6.2026 | $1.165 |
| 16.3.2026 | $1.165 |
| 15.3.2026 | $1.165 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.165 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.165 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.090 |
| 14.9.2025 | $1.090 |
| 16.6.2025 | $1.090 |
| 15.6.2025 | $1.090 |
| 17.3.2025 | $1.090 |
| 16.3.2025 | $1.090 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$59.43
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$48.90
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 6 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
DTE Energy (DTE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DTE currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DTE's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.8% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.80; Calmar: 0.39 (3y annualized return 6.5% / max drawdown 16.8%); Debt/equity: 2.13.
Yes — DTE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauer Trevor F | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $135.71 |
| BRANDON DAVID | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 240.75 | +240.75 | $150.57 |
| TORGOW GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 240.75 | +240.75 | $150.57 |
| BRANDON DAVID | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 17,087 | +241 | $150.57 |
| TORGOW GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 7,339 | +241 | $150.57 |
| Muschong Lisa A. | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $143.72 |
| Muschong Lisa A. | Open Market Sale | 14.5.2026 | 6,233 | -1,000 | $143.72 |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 1,218.72 | -1,218.72 | — |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Disposition to the Company | 8.5.2026 | 1,218.72 | -1,218.72 | $140.60 |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 1,218.72 | +1,218.72 | — |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 1,219 | +1,219 | — |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Disposition to the Company | 8.5.2026 | 0 | -1,219 | $140.60 |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 8.5.2026 | 53,179 | -1,219 | — |
| MCCLURE CHARLES G | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| TORGOW GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| Santos Cassandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| Akins Nicholas K | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| SKAGGS ROBERT C JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| BRANDON DAVID | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| MCGOVERN GAIL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| Williams Valerie | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| Thomas David A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| MURRAY MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| Byers Deborah L | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | — |
| SKAGGS ROBERT C JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 14,109 | +1,230 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,947,441 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,355,580 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology