Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$58.01
▼ $0.83 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:18 AM
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$57.56 - $58.65
52-Week Range
$48.83 - $81.89
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$57.56
Resistance
$70.11
DOO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-8.5% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.15 (3y annualized return -8.6% / max drawdown 59.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
DOO demonstrates a robust overall score of 83, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and favorable news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category scores an impressive 84, reflecting a price above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram signaling upward momentum, and an RSI of 61.1—all of which suggest a healthy bullish trend. The news category achieves a perfect 100, buoyed by positive market movements (e.g., VersaBank’s 10% jump) and earnings highlights like BRP’s 18% revenue surge and raised EPS guidance, reinforcing investor confidence. However, the risk category drags the score down to 42, with a high ATR (3.7% of price) and a negative Keltner channel (-0.07) indicating volatility and a historical 59.1% peak-to-trough decline over three years, signaling potential instability. The combination of strong technicals and news contrasts sharply with elevated risk metrics, creating a nuanced outlook where short-term momentum is balanced against long-term volatility concerns.
The stock price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and the RSI (61.1) reflects healthy upward momentum, while %K (72.9) remains neutral.
These technicals collectively suggest a strong bullish bias, reinforcing investor confidence in sustained upward movement.
Recent news includes positive market movements (e.g., VersaBank’s 10% gain) and strong earnings reports (18% revenue growth, raised EPS guidance), outweighing a single negative earnings call transcript.
Positive news sentiment directly supports investor optimism and stock valuation, driving short-term price appreciation.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR: 3.7% of price) and a negative Keltner channel (-0.07), alongside a historical 59.1% peak-to-trough decline over three years.
These risk metrics highlight potential for significant price swings and volatility, which could erode investor confidence or trigger sharp corrections.
StockIQ conclusion
DOO presents a compelling case with strong technical indicators and positive news sentiment, supported by recent earnings momentum and relative outperformance. However, elevated volatility and historical risk metrics create a balanced but cautious outlook. Investors should monitor volatility trends and earnings consistency to assess whether the current momentum can sustain long-term growth or if risk factors may escalate. The stock’s score reflects a nuanced balance between short-term strength and underlying volatility risks.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
10d ago · $63.23
Evidence: -6.1pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
10d ago · $63.23
Evidence: attention score 86/100
What happened after
10d ago · $63.23
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
10d ago · $63.23
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
10d ago · $63.23
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
11d ago · $67.32
Evidence: +4.7pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
11d ago · $67.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
11d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
11d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
12d ago · $67.32
Evidence: +4.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
12d ago · $67.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
12d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
12d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $67.32
Evidence: +4.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
13d ago · $67.32
Evidence: attention score 65/100
What happened after
13d ago · $67.32
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
13d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
13d ago · $67.32
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $67.32
Evidence: +4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
14d ago · $67.32
Evidence: attention score 65/100
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of BRP Inc. has centered on its strong financial performance in the second quarter of fiscal 2027, highlighting an **18% revenue surge** and raised earnings per share (EPS) guidance. The company reported record market share in off-road vehicles (ORV) while noting challenges from tariffs and inflationary costs. Analysts raised BRP’s price target to **CA$112**, and the company announced plans to expand production capacity. Additionally, BRP was named an **official partner of the Montreal Canadiens**, reinforcing its brand presence.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BRP Inc. - Common Subordinate Voting. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a fragmented psychological landscape: extreme sentiment (100/100) across all states contrasts with negative momentum (-5.9% ROC), indicating potential overreaction. Herding is dominant relative to peers, while FOMO and panic signals coexist, revealing conflicting impulses. The narrative gap (7-point divergence) hints at misaligned expectations. The key question: is the extreme sentiment masking underlying fragility, or does it reflect selective conviction?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:59 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue Surges 18% and EPS Guidance Raised"
"record ORV market share"
"faces significant tariff headwinds and inflationary costs"
"BRP Price Target Raised to CA$112 at Desjardins"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-universal caution (like Morgan Housel’s 10, flagging volatility risks) to outright indecision (e.g., Jesse Livermore’s 61, calling for a pass due to unclear trends). Meanwhile, Charles Mackay’s 53 hints at speculative crowd behavior, while the majority—from Benjamin Graham to Peter Lynch—sit at 50, not because they see opportunity but because critical data (dividends, fundamentals, balance sheets) is simply unavailable for a definitive read. Even the rare outliers like Edgar Lawrence Smith (100) are constrained by insufficient dividend/growth data, underscoring that this stock’s murky fundamentals and speculative undertones leave few methodologies with a clear, confident stance.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 31
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 10
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$57.56
Range Bottom
$70.11
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.176 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.176 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.181 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.181 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.157 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.157 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.153 |
| 28.9.2025 | $0.153 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.157 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.157 |
| 4.4.2025 | $0.153 |
| 3.4.2025 | $0.153 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Barrons.com · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
CNW Group · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Investing.com · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for BRP Inc. - Common Subordinate Voting (DOO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DOO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DOO's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.15 (3y annualized return -8.6% / max drawdown 59.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — DOO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,307,257 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,045,331 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology