Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$182.12
▼ $2.14 (-1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 09:12 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$64.00B
Day Range
$181.48 - $184.56
52-Week Range
$146.23 - $208.14
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$171.03
Resistance
$207.47
DLR is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+6.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 122.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (71/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
84/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-0.7%
Median 40D Outcome
62/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
40%
+6.2% … +12.1%
🟡 Base
13%
+0.0% … +0.4%
🔴 Bearish
47%
-6.5% … -4.2%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 40% (95% CI 20%–64%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -0.1%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
3 occurrence(s) · 67% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.5% | -1.2% … +4.1% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.5% | -3.9% … +5.8% | +0.6% |
| 20D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.1% | -5.9% … +6.9% | +1.0% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -0.7% | -6.6% … +4.6% | +1.7% |
| 60D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.7% | -5.8% … +10.0% | +1.6% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-30 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -6.2% | -4.4% |
| 2017-12-08 | 84/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -9.7% |
| 2020-09-22 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +8.5% | -9.6% |
| 2026-06-11 | 83/100 | Consolidation | -2.7% | +3.6% |
| 2025-01-14 | 83/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -6.1% | -18.2% |
| 2017-12-22 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -0.1% | -7.3% |
| 2018-02-02 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -6.8% | -2.5% |
| 2020-11-03 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | -9.4% | +1.6% |
| 2024-04-22 | 80/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +5.5% | +13.8% |
| 2023-10-25 | 80/100 | Consolidation | +17.0% | +18.9% |
| 2020-07-16 | 79/100 | Consolidation | +8.3% | +12.7% |
| 2023-10-06 | 78/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +13.3% | +13.8% |
| 2024-03-25 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +0.5% | +7.3% |
| 2025-07-02 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +2.5% | -0.4% |
| 2025-08-04 | 76/100 | Consolidation | -5.8% | +0.7% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
42
Value
45
Momentum
29
Risk
42
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DLR...
Recent media coverage of **Digital Realty** highlights its aggressive expansion in key global data center hubs, driven by surging demand for AI infrastructure. The company has announced major investments in **Singapore** and **Kenya**, including the launch of the **6.4 MW Nairobi Two (NBO2) data center** and the acquisition of **iColo’s operations** in Kenya and Mozambique, positioning itself as a critical digital gateway for East Africa. The broader industry trend—fueled by AI growth—is underscoring Digital Realty’s role as a leader in cloud-neutral data center infrastructure.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Digital Realty. News trend score: 86. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
48
Technical
29
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for DLR suggests a **narrative-driven euphoria** (score: 19) fueled by extreme positive sentiment (100/100) despite weak momentum and neutral technical indicators. This disconnect between narrative (62) and reality (36) highlights a potential mispricing gap, where optimism outweighs fundamental or technical signals. The absence of panic or herding implies confidence is detached from price action. The key question: *Will the gap between narrative and reality widen further, or will technicals eventually reassert dominance?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 02:36 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI Demand Drives Growth"
"Digital Realty Expands Kenya Data Center Campus"
"hyperscalers are signing multi-year leases"
"record bookings, backlog and a strong development pipeline"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for **DLR** reflects deep methodological disagreements about what makes a stock attractive. **Peter Lynch’s high score (78)** suggests this stock aligns with his ‘growth candidate’ criteria—where the price hasn’t yet reflected underlying expansion, making it a speculative bet on future upside. Meanwhile, **Benjamin Graham’s near-zero score (3)** and **Walter Bagehot’s outright rejection (0)** stem from strict valuation and balance-sheet standards: Graham’s rules demand defensive metrics (low debt, stable earnings) that this stock fails, while Bagehot lacks sufficient financial transparency. Even **Jesse Livermore’s negative score (28)** and **Jack Schwager’s dismissal (15)** highlight concerns about momentum and structural setups—Livermore’s trend-following discipline clashes with the stock’s current trajectory, while Schwager’s ‘wizard’ approach sees no disciplined entry point. In contrast, **Charles Mackay’s moderate excitement (68)** and **Howard Marks’ mixed but cautious view (44)** acknowledge speculative hype or cyclical positioning, whereas **Philip Fisher’s rejection (46)** and **Edgar Lawrence Smith’s lukewarm take (62)** point to a lack of the ‘quality/growth signature’ or long-term fundamentals Fisher and Smith prioritize.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 78
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 76
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 73
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 48
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 46
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 5
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid accumulation phase — a trading range after a decline with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$171.03
Range Bottom
$207.47
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
10.8%
Net Margin
21.4%
EBITDA Margin
41.8%
ROE
5.7%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.73
Cash
$3.45B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $1.220 |
| 14.6.2026 | $1.220 |
| 13.3.2026 | $1.220 |
| 12.3.2026 | $1.220 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.220 |
| 14.12.2025 | $1.220 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.220 |
| 14.9.2025 | $1.220 |
| 13.6.2025 | $1.220 |
| 12.6.2025 | $1.220 |
| 14.3.2025 | $1.220 |
| 13.3.2025 | $1.220 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$65.91
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$32.79
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 6 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 15.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 15.9.2026
CNBC · 15.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 14.9.2026
Digital Realty (DLR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DLR currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DLR's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 122.4%; Net income growth: 117.2%; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 12.8% / max drawdown 30.4%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — DLR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson Mark R | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 6,322 | -200 | $193.96 |
| Patterson Mark R | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $193.96 |
| Kornegay Christine Beseda | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 53 | -53 | $176.32 |
| Kornegay Christine Beseda | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 4,298 | -53 | $176.32 |
| Swanezy Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 153 | +153 | — |
| Jamieson VeraLinn | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 153 | +153 | — |
| Swanezy Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,010 | +153 | — |
| Jamieson VeraLinn | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 14,696 | +153 | — |
| Swanezy Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 5,010 | +153 | — |
| Jamieson VeraLinn | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 14,696 | +153 | — |
| Bolze Stephen R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| MANDEVILLE JEAN F H P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| Swanezy Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| Jamieson VeraLinn | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| LAPERCH WILLIAM G | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| MOHEBBI AFSHIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| KENNEDY KEVIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| Preusse Mary Hogan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,815 | +1,815 | — |
| Patterson Mark R | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 1,289 | +1,289 | — |
| KENNEDY KEVIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 13,931 | +1,289 | — |
| MOHEBBI AFSHIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 15,013 | +1,289 | — |
| MANDEVILLE JEAN F H P | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 11,039 | +1,289 | — |
| LAPERCH WILLIAM G | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 14,769 | +1,289 | — |
| Patterson Mark R | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 15,509 | +1,289 | — |
| Swanezy Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.5.2026 | 4,857 | +1,289 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,390,668 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,421,234 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology