Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$78.12
▼ $3.43 (-4.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:44 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$4.78B
Day Range
$77.32 - $82.27
52-Week Range
$25.85 - $82.27
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$54.93
Resistance
$82.27
DK is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+143.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 95.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$41.58 vs. price $78.12 (-153.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
71/100
Similarity
6
Historical Matches
67/100
Analog Quality
+11.6%
Median 40D Outcome
57/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
33%
+6.1% … +12.4%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
67%
-7.8% … -4.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 6 similar historical cases for this stock, 33% (95% CI 10%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -4.4%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 50% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 17% (3%–56%) | -4.8% | -6.0% … -2.8% | +2.6% |
| 10D | 50% (19%–81%) | +0.9% | -5.1% … +8.2% | +5.6% |
| 20D | 33% (10%–70%) | -4.4% | -6.4% … +1.1% | +7.7% |
| 40D | 83% (44%–97%) | +11.6% | +10.8% … +19.3% | +20.9% |
| 60D | 100% (61%–100%) | +39.2% | +21.2% … +43.7% | +43.6% |
Sample size: 6 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-30 | 71/100 | High Volatility | -10.3% | +3.1% |
| 2026-06-10 | 69/100 | Uptrend | +15.6% | +49.7% |
| 2026-03-16 | 67/100 | ✓ High Volatility | -4.3% | +16.7% |
| 2026-05-19 | 62/100 | High Volatility | -7.0% | +43.8% |
| 2026-04-30 | 53/100 | High Volatility | -4.5% | +34.8% |
| 2026-04-16 | 48/100 | Uptrend | +2.9% | +43.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
3d ago · $78.14
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 62)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
91
Risk
28
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
19
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Delek US Holdings, Inc.** has primarily focused on regulatory developments and insider activity. The company welcomed the EPA’s decision on 2025 Small Refinery Exemptions, which may influence its capital allocation and support local refinery investments. Additionally, an executive insider sold shares under a pre-arranged trading plan, though no broader financial or operational updates were provided. Most headlines instead centered on industry peers rather than Delek itself.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Delek US Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 16 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
48
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
19
Technical
91
Valuation
38
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+88%
Market Narrative
72
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant euphoric state, where extreme overvaluation (+42.1% above 200-day average) and extreme positive sentiment (92/100) align with FOMO and overconfidence. Confirmation bias persists despite weak fundamentals, as traders prioritize narrative over reality. The key open question is whether momentum can sustain itself or if the gap between narrative and fundamentals will eventually correct. The absence of herding or loss aversion implies confidence in continued upside despite peer underperformance.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 03:24 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"WMB's $5.5 billion Momentum Midstream deal expands its Haynesville network"
"EPA move on Small Refinery Exemptions for the 2025 compliance year is expected to influence how Delek allocates capital within its refineries"
"Insider's sale reduces direct equity position by 22%, though he retains 36,435 following pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan execution"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 77/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-universal pass from Benjamin Graham (0) to cautious optimism from Jesse Livermore (69). The most extreme warnings—like Bagehot’s liquidity concerns (1) or Graham’s outright rejection (0)—align with a defensive, risk-averse view, suggesting the stock’s fundamentals or market positioning lack the margin of safety these investors demanded. Meanwhile, Livermore’s higher score reflects his willingness to tolerate ambiguity in trending markets, though his verdict still leans toward abstention. The middle-ground thinkers—such as Lynch (56) and Fisher (48)—acknowledge potential but flag either overvaluation or insufficient quality, while cycle-focused investors like Marks (11) and Nelson (32) see it as late-stage, vulnerable to reversals. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s risks are outweighed by speculative upside or if it’s fundamentally mispriced.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 77
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 26
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 21
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 11
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 11
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 1
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 1
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 0
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 0 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
5.7%
Operating Margin
2.8%
Net Margin
-0.2%
EBITDA Margin
6.5%
ROE
-4.2%
ROA
-0.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.38
Cash
$625.80M
Total Debt
$3.23B
Current Ratio
0.82
Debt/Equity
5.91
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.8.2026 | $0.255 |
| 1.5.2026 | $0.255 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.255 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.255 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.255 |
| 12.5.2025 | $0.255 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.255 |
| 12.11.2024 | $0.255 |
| 12.8.2024 | $0.255 |
| 16.5.2024 | $0.250 |
| 29.2.2024 | $0.245 |
| 10.11.2023 | $0.240 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$78.12
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$41.58
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-153.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $5.99M | $5.49M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $5.80M | $4.88M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $5.73M | $4.42M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $5.76M | $4.08M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $5.91M | $3.84M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$6.30M
Terminal Value
$93.12M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$60.52M
Enterprise Value
$83.23M
Net Debt
$2.61B
Equity Value
$-2.52B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.02
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$5.50
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 16 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Delek US Holdings, Inc. (DK) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DK currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DK's estimated fair value is -$41.58, which is 153.2% below the current price of $78.12. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DK's technical score is 91/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 95.7%; Free cash flow growth: 101.3%; Net income growth: 95.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$41.58 vs. price $78.12 (-153.2%); Net margin: -0.2% (negative); ATR: 5.4% of price.
Yes — DK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 19 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan Gary M Jr. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 27,688 | -27,688 | $69.01 |
| Sullivan Gary M Jr. | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 32,004 | -27,688 | $69.01 |
| Marcogliese Richard J | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 12,880 | -2,000 | $71.05 |
| FINNERTY WILLIAM J | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 33,348 | -1,457 | $64.70 |
| FINNERTY WILLIAM J | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 1,457 | -1,457 | $64.70 |
| Marcogliese Richard J | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $71.05 |
| Spiegel Reuven | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $68.21 |
| Hobbs Mark Wayne | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 4,876 | -4,876 | $65.28 |
| Hobbs Mark Wayne | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 15,124 | -15,124 | $64.36 |
| Soreq Avigal | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 4,623 | -4,623 | $65.35 |
| Soreq Avigal | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 13,074 | -13,074 | $67.20 |
| Soreq Avigal | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 57,700 | -57,700 | $66.62 |
| Soreq Avigal | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 4,603 | -4,603 | $64.38 |
| Yemin Ezra Uzi | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 38,388 | -38,388 | $66.64 |
| Yemin Ezra Uzi | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 61,822 | -61,822 | $68.27 |
| Yemin Ezra Uzi | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 82,224 | -82,224 | $67.74 |
| Yemin Ezra Uzi | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 17,566 | -17,566 | $65.75 |
| FINNERTY WILLIAM J | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 34,805 | -5,000 | $51.50 |
| FINNERTY WILLIAM J | Open Market Sale | 29.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $51.50 |
| Sutil Vicky | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 32,804 | +3,436 | $48.01 |
| Yemin Ezra Uzi | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 213,717 | +3,436 | $48.01 |
| Zohar Shlomo | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 10,082 | +3,436 | $48.01 |
| Spiegel Reuven | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 46,435 | -1,937 | $48.01 |
| McWatters Denise Clark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 70,700 | -3,496 | $48.01 |
| Wright Robert G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.6.2026 | 46,278 | -846 | $48.01 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,893,786 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,022,121 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology