Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$23.27
▲ $0.45 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 06:42 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$3.74B
Day Range
$22.88 - $23.48
52-Week Range
$10.83 - $23.51
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$17.01
Resistance
$23.51
DHT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+81.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 21/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.38
Risk
Biggest negative driver
RSI
RSI 77.2 — approaching overbought territory
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202672
This Week
72
7D Ago
→ 0
Stable
Technical
82
7D Ago: 85
↓ -3
Fundamental
80
7D Ago: 80
→ 0
Growth
60
7D Ago: 60
→ 0
Valuation
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
News
98
7D Ago: 86
↑ +12
Quality
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
Risk
62
7D Ago: 62
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $22.15
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 71)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
72 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
69
$19.17
Now
72
$23.27
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
82
Risk
62
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **DHT Holdings, Inc.** highlights its strong financial performance and market positioning, particularly driven by rising **Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) spot rates** and geopolitical tensions in the **Strait of Hormuz**. Analysts emphasize its **high dividend yield (24% forward)**, robust balance sheet, and expanding fleet as key strengths, with some reports noting its benefits from Middle East instability and favorable refining margins. The company is frequently cited alongside other high-yield dividend stocks and surging market leaders, reflecting investor confidence in its growth momentum.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about DHT Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
71
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
79
Fundamentals
80
Technical
82
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
85
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+33
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DHT’s psychology is dominated by **anchoring**, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (2.5%) suggests traders are fixating on this level as a psychological barrier. FOMO and mild euphoria coexist due to positive momentum (+4.2% ROC) and strong sentiment (86/100), but overconfidence is muted by modest EPS growth alignment. The narrative gap (11 points) hints at a disconnect between perceived optimism and underlying fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders break through resistance, or will anchoring hold as momentum stalls?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Phillips 66 and DHT Holdings benefit from Middle East tensions, strong crack spreads & tanker rates through 2026."
"DHT Holdings remains a Strong Buy, driven by ... a forward yield now at 24%."
"Each stock in this article is trading near its 52-week high."
"DHT Holdings passes CANSLIM growth screen with strong earnings, sales, and technical momentum."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value/cycle-sensitive methodologies. The highest scores come from investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith (96) and Walter Bagehot (92), who prioritize long-term fundamentals and resilience—Smith sees it as a 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate, while Bagehot highlights its liquidity strength. Meanwhile, value-focused approaches like Benjamin Graham (60) and his Enterprising Investor variant (40) are lukewarm, flagging it as neither cheap enough nor statistically compelling. The middle ground—Peter Lynch (69) and Howard Marks (53)—acknowledges growth but warns the price may already reflect it, while cycle-aware thinkers like Nelson (8) and Marks’ late-cycle model (39) see it as overbought or stretched. The contrast underscores whether this stock’s appeal lies in its durability (Smith/Bagehot) or if its valuation risks outweigh its potential (Graham/Schwager).
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 96
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 92
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 79
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 65
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 53
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 44
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 32
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 17
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 10
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 1
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
59.7%
Operating Margin
45.1%
Net Margin
42.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
18.6%
ROA
13.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.31
Cash
$79.03M
Total Debt
$389.24M
Current Ratio
2.80
Debt/Equity
0.38
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $1.220 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.640 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.640 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.410 |
| 18.2.2026 | $0.410 |
| 21.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 20.5.2025 | $0.150 |
| 18.2.2025 | $0.170 |
| 17.2.2025 | $0.170 |
| 22.11.2024 | $0.220 |
| 21.11.2024 | $0.220 |
| 23.8.2024 | $0.270 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.05
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
StockStory · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
MT Newswires · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 12.9.2026
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 72/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DHT currently scores 72/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DHT's technical score is 82/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.38; Current ratio: 2.80; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: RSI 77.2 — approaching overbought territory; %K 94.1 — overbought.
Yes — DHT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $21.00 |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 299,622 | -25,000 | $20.35 |
| Rossini Sophie | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 78,543 | -33,000 | $20.04 |
| Edvardsen Svenn Magne | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 395,705 | -341,007 | $20.29 |
| Rossini Sophie | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 33,000 | -33,000 | $20.04 |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | $20.35 |
| Edvardsen Svenn Magne | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 341,007 | -341,007 | $20.29 |
| Halvorsen Laila Cecilie | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $20.00 |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $19.99 |
| Kramer Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 29,796 | -29,796 | $18.65 |
| Kramer Jeremy | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 71,332 | -29,796 | $18.65 |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 1,747 | +1,747 | — |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 21,747 | +21,747 | — |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 21,747 | -21,747 | — |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 51,543 | +21,747 | — |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.6.2026 | 21,747 | +1,747 | — |
| Pocas Zambelli Ana Lucia | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.6.2026 | 0 | -21,747 | — |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 6,795 | -6,795 | — |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 545 | +545 | — |
| Eglin Jon Stephen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 6,795 | +6,795 | — |
| Edvardsen Svenn Magne | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 6,795 | -6,795 | — |
| Harfjeld Svein Moxnes | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 32,620 | -32,620 | — |
| Harfjeld Svein Moxnes | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 2,620 | +2,620 | — |
| Edvardsen Svenn Magne | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.6.2026 | 545 | +545 | — |
| Halvorsen Laila Cecilie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 6,795 | +6,795 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,149,618 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 10,521,403 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology