Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$1.35
▼ $0.05 (-3.6%)
Market data updated: 09/26 10:59 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/25/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$39.33M
Day Range
$1.35 - $1.44
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$1.06
Resistance
$2.19
DGNX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-98.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 29.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -880.5% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $1.37
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 23 to -15 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $1.37
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
19d ago · $1.50
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -5 to 24 day-over-day
What happened after
19d ago · $1.50
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 9 to 48 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
52
Quality
55
Value
50
Momentum
33
Risk
46
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
34
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Diginex Limited has centered on two key developments: the leadership transition, with CEO Lubomila Jordanova stepping down (August 31, 2026) and Archana Kotecha appointed interim CEO, alongside a Nasdaq listing application for a potential change of control. Additionally, the company announced a $1.05 billion acquisition of Resulticks, a move to expand its AI-driven sustainability and customer engagement solutions, with shareholder approval set for an October 8 extraordinary general meeting. Insider sales and regulatory filings were also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Diginex Limited. News trend score: 62. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
33
Fundamentals
34
Technical
33
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+55%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DGNX’s psychology is dominated by FOMO, fueled by strong technical momentum, positive sentiment, and a narrative-reality gap (24-point divergence). The disconnect between price gains and modest EPS growth suggests overconfidence may amplify urgency, while the stock’s outperformance relative to peers hints at selective rather than herd-driven participation. The key question: Is this momentum self-sustaining, or will the gap between narrative hype and fundamentals widen further? The absence of panic or anchoring signals suggests no immediate liquidation pressure, but the overconfidence score warns of potential overreach if momentum falters.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 07:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Lubomila Jordanova decided to step down as CEO and Archana Kotecha named interim CEO"
"Diginex and Resulticks Sign Amended Definitive Agreement to create a global AI-powered group"
"Submission of listing application to Nasdaq for change of control"
"Diginex Grows Revenue 77%, Remains Debt-Free as platform takes shape"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DGNX reflects deep philosophical and methodological splits among these investors. At the top, Walter Bagehot and Peter Lynch see it as a resilient or high-growth opportunity—Bagehot’s liquidity focus suggests it could weather volatility, while Lynch’s growth lens implies the stock’s price hasn’t yet reflected its potential. Conversely, Fisher’s zero score and Veblen’s low rating highlight a stark contrast: Fisher lacks sufficient fundamental data to justify a buy, while Veblen’s critique flags speculative growth chasing. Meanwhile, the middle-ground methodologies—like Marks’ cycle-aware approach or Graham’s mixed verdict—balance caution with opportunity, noting either reasonable risk pricing or moderate excitement without outright alarm. The contrast between Marks’ mid-cycle optimism and Nelson’s overbought warning underscores how even similar investors (e.g., Marks’ two entries) can diverge based on nuanced timing or risk thresholds.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 98
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 93
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 88
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 77
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 66
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
-880.5%
Net Margin
-863.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-153.7%
ROA
-52.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.33
Cash
$3.11M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.72
Debt/Equity
0.01
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$0.70
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.47
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 12 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Diginex Limited (DGNX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DGNX currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DGNX's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 29.3%; Debt/equity: 0.01; Current ratio: 1.72.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -880.5% (negative); Net margin: -863.6% (negative); ATR: 8.8% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DGNX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 10 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 3,231,707 | -2,500,000 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 5,731,707 | -1,908,540 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 731,707 | -2,500,000 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 303,400 | -294,380 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,500,000 | -2,500,000 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,908,540 | -1,908,540 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,500,000 | -2,500,000 | $1.00 |
| Pelham Miles Christian | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 294,380 | -294,380 | $1.00 |
| Bridges Graham | Open Market Sale | 16.4.2026 | 1 | -1 | $0.70 |
| Bridges Graham | Open Market Sale | 16.4.2026 | 631,227 | -1 | $0.70 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
843,010 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 893,919 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology