Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$123.89
▲ $0.88 (+0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 05:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$123.51 - $125.12
52-Week Range
$95.11 - $158.23
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
DG is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
+18.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/26 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 34.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
77/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
89/100
Analog Quality
+9.9%
Median 40D Outcome
44/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
73%
+6.3% … +13.2%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
27%
-6.8% … -5.4%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 73% (95% CI 48%–89%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +7.4%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
2 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 67% (42%–85%) | +1.6% | -0.8% … +3.1% | +0.2% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +3.3% | -2.1% … +7.0% | +0.7% |
| 20D | 73% (48%–89%) | +7.4% | -1.9% … +10.4% | +1.1% |
| 40D | 73% (48%–89%) | +9.9% | +1.9% … +19.9% | +2.2% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +9.8% | +4.1% … +20.2% | +3.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-28 | 77/100 | Consolidation | +5.1% | +8.6% |
| 2025-11-04 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +10.1% | +43.8% |
| 2025-03-05 | 76/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +22.4% | +32.0% |
| 2024-12-20 | 76/100 | Downtrend | -6.6% | +9.5% |
| 2020-05-01 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +10.7% | +9.8% |
| 2018-12-18 | 76/100 | Consolidation | +7.6% | +11.7% |
| 2025-08-26 | 75/100 | Consolidation | -5.4% | -9.8% |
| 2020-03-05 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +1.4% | +21.6% |
| 2024-01-30 | 75/100 | Consolidation | +8.6% | +8.1% |
| 2024-03-22 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -5.2% | -16.0% |
| 2022-10-14 | 74/100 | Consolidation | +5.3% | +0.1% |
| 2025-05-01 | 74/100 | Uptrend | +7.4% | +18.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | 73/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +35.2% | +48.1% |
| 2024-07-15 | 73/100 | Downtrend | -7.4% | -34.2% |
| 2026-06-17 | 73/100 | Downtrend | +15.7% | +18.8% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLP (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $131.09
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 29 to 54 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
29
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
48
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DG...
Recent media coverage on Dollar General has focused on its financial performance and investor sentiment amid economic uncertainty. Analysts like Barclays raised their price target to $151, reflecting optimism, while comparisons with Dollar Tree highlighted both retailers' strong quarterly results—driven by essential goods demand and tariff refunds. Dollar General saw a modest 3.5% year-over-year sales increase, reinforcing its resilience in value-driven retail. However, broader macroeconomic concerns and retail sector volatility may influence long-term investor perceptions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dollar General. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
44
Fundamentals
48
Technical
29
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests a dominant narrative of **euphoria**, reinforced by strong momentum, elevated valuation, and near-universal positive sentiment. Traders appear to be chasing gains rather than hedging, with overconfidence in price appreciation over fundamentals. The peer underperformance today hints at selective participation, but the lack of extreme volatility or selling pressure keeps panic selling muted. The key open question is whether this momentum-driven optimism will sustain itself or if a narrative gap—where expectations diverge sharply from fundamentals—could trigger a re-evaluation.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:57 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Dollar General Corporation (NYSE:DG) saw a 3.5% year-over-year increase in quarterly sales amid economic uncertainty"
"Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ:DLTR) and Dollar General Corporation (NYSE:DG) both reported quarterly results above sales expectations"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between Peter Lynch’s high score (74) and the overwhelmingly negative verdicts from methodologies like Benjamin Graham (20) and Walter Bagehot (4) highlights a fundamental divide in how these investors evaluate this stock. Lynch’s model sees it as a growth candidate where the price hasn’t fully reflected underlying potential, while Graham and Bagehot’s frameworks flag it as either statistically overvalued or structurally risky—particularly in liquidity and defensive metrics. Even mid-tier signals from Veblen (60) and Mackay (56) suggest caution, questioning whether growth translates to sustainable profit or if speculative excitement is driving the price. Meanwhile, the lowest scores from Housel (26), Schwager (24), and Fisher (17) align on dismissing it as volatile, lacking disciplined setup, or failing quality thresholds, reinforcing a consensus that this stock doesn’t meet rigorous, long-term-oriented criteria—despite Lynch’s bullish interpretation.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 60
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 54
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 18
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 4
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
30.7%
Operating Margin
5.2%
Net Margin
3.5%
EBITDA Margin
7.6%
ROE
17.8%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.87
Cash
$1.14B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.13
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.7.2026 | $0.590 |
| 6.7.2026 | $0.590 |
| 7.4.2026 | $0.590 |
| 6.4.2026 | $0.590 |
| 6.1.2026 | $0.590 |
| 5.1.2026 | $0.590 |
| 7.10.2025 | $0.590 |
| 6.10.2025 | $0.590 |
| 8.7.2025 | $0.590 |
| 7.7.2025 | $0.590 |
| 8.4.2025 | $0.590 |
| 7.4.2025 | $0.590 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$38.55
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.47
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
ChartMill · 15.9.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Barchart · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Dollar General (DG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DG currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
DG's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 34.1%; Net income growth: 34.4%; +7.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.05 (3y annualized return 2.7% / max drawdown 57.5%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — DG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REARDON KATHLEEN A | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 5,578 | -5,578 | $131.33 |
| BRYANT WARREN F | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 1.285 | -1.285 | $109.90 |
| CALBERT MICHAEL M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| Chadwick Ana Maria | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 0.326 | -0.326 | $109.90 |
| Chadwick Ana Maria | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| McGuire Timothy I | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 0.326 | -0.326 | $109.90 |
| McGuire Timothy I | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| ROWLAND DAVID P | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| Sandler Debra A. | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 0.326 | -0.326 | $109.90 |
| Sandler Debra A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| SANTANA RALPH E | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 0.326 | -0.326 | $109.90 |
| SANTANA RALPH E | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| Scarlett Kathleen | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 0.326 | -0.326 | $109.90 |
| Scarlett Kathleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| Hicks Gregory H | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,647 | +1,647 | — |
| BRYANT WARREN F | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 44,265 | -1 | $109.90 |
| CALBERT MICHAEL M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 127,852 | +1,647 | — |
| SANTANA RALPH E | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 8,358 | +1,647 | — |
| SANTANA RALPH E | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 8,358 | +0 | $109.90 |
| ROWLAND DAVID P | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 7,848 | +1,647 | — |
| Sandler Debra A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 8,622 | +1,647 | — |
| Sandler Debra A. | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 8,622 | +0 | $109.90 |
| Scarlett Kathleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 5,354 | +1,647 | — |
| Scarlett Kathleen | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 5,354 | +0 | $109.90 |
| McGuire Timothy I | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 17,100 | +1,647 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,887,587 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 7,524,336 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology