Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$683.99
▼ $1.64 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 11:37 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$184.42B
Day Range
$679.63 - $687.04
52-Week Range
$433.00 - $705.88
Beta
—
Next Earnings
25.11.2026
Support
$576.45
Resistance
$705.88
DE is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+43.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $286.60 vs. price $683.99 (-58.1%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
84/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
+5.9%
Median 40D Outcome
49/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
47%
+4.7% … +16.1%
🟡 Base
13%
-0.2% … +0.2%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-11.9% … -4.4%
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 47% (95% CI 25%–70%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +0.3%.
Echo #1 — Trend Acceleration
12 occurrence(s) · 58% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 27% (11%–52%) | -0.7% | -2.4% … +2.5% | +0.5% |
| 10D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.8% | -5.1% … +5.3% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 47% (25%–70%) | +0.3% | -4.8% … +8.0% | +1.2% |
| 40D | 53% (30%–75%) | +5.9% | -2.8% … +13.5% | +2.6% |
| 60D | 53% (30%–75%) | +2.7% | -7.0% … +15.8% | +3.7% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-31 | 84/100 | Uptrend | +19.1% | +32.9% |
| 2026-01-27 | 81/100 | Uptrend | +20.1% | +14.0% |
| 2021-01-25 | 80/100 | Uptrend | +13.1% | +26.0% |
| 2025-02-10 | 79/100 | Uptrend | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| 2025-03-07 | 79/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -14.0% | +2.7% |
| 2019-10-01 | 78/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +5.2% | +5.6% |
| 2020-09-16 | 78/100 | Uptrend | +10.7% | +17.7% |
| 2023-08-09 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -5.6% | -14.3% |
| 2024-12-11 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -4.0% | +5.2% |
| 2025-05-22 | 77/100 | Uptrend | -0.3% | -5.1% |
| 2020-10-01 | 77/100 | ✓ Uptrend | +4.1% | +22.1% |
| 2022-04-13 | 76/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -15.1% | -30.7% |
| 2022-12-20 | 76/100 | Uptrend | -5.7% | -9.4% |
| 2022-02-14 | 76/100 | Uptrend | +0.3% | -6.0% |
| 2025-06-12 | 75/100 | Uptrend | -1.8% | -8.0% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLI (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $693.21
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 64)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
69
Risk
50
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
53
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING DE...
Recent media coverage of Deere & Company has centered on its strong investor interest and stock performance, with multiple sources noting the company’s shares hitting all-time highs. Analysts, including those at Evercore ISI and UBS, have upgraded Deere’s outlook, citing stabilizing used-equipment inventories and early signs of demand recovery in the agricultural sector. While broader industry trends show cyclical weakness, Deere’s potential to rebound by late 2026 has drawn attention. Comparisons with peers like Caterpillar also highlight Deere’s market positioning.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Deere & Company. News trend score: 92. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
48
Fundamentals
53
Technical
69
Valuation
33
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price (3M)
+16%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+35
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant confirmation bias (score 62) suggests traders are selectively interpreting data to justify the stock’s valuation, despite weak revenue growth. The narrative gap (+48) and extreme overvaluation (+138% vs DCF) align with overconfidence (59) and euphoria (50), while FOMO (46) and herding (56) indicate momentum-driven participation. The key question is whether traders will sustain selective optimism or reassess fundamentals as the narrative gap persists. Anchoring remains minimal, but the lack of loss aversion signals no defensive positioning despite overvaluation.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Evercore ISI Group Upgrades Deere (DE) to Outperform from In-Line"
"Deere Stock Hit an All-Time High This Week"
"The recovery cycle for Deere's equipment could be just beginning"
"UBS Remains Bullish on Deere (DE) Despite Weakness in Farm Equipment Cycle"
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 62/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts. Jesse Livermore and Walter Bagehot’s high scores (76 and 74) suggest a technical or balance-sheet-driven opportunity, with Livermore spotting a favorable price trend and Bagehot’s near-positive read hinting at underlying fundamentals. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—from Graham’s defensive framework (13) to Marks’ cautionary cycle analysis (27) and Lynch’s growth bar (30)—flag red flags, emphasizing valuation risks, volatility, or speculative patterns. The divide between technical traders (Livermore) and fundamentalists (Graham, Fisher) underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in momentum or intrinsic value, while cyclicalists (Marks, Nelson) warn of overbought conditions. Even the efficient-market proponents (Malkiel/Bogle) dismiss it as unconvincing, leaving only moderate support from Smith (62) for a tactical play.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 74
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 63
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 40
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 35
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 29
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 13
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
11.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
19.4%
ROA
4.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$18.55
Cash
$8.28B
Total Debt
$13.80B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.53
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $1.620 |
| 29.6.2026 | $1.620 |
| 31.3.2026 | $1.620 |
| 30.3.2026 | $1.620 |
| 31.12.2025 | $1.620 |
| 30.12.2025 | $1.620 |
| 30.9.2025 | $1.620 |
| 29.9.2025 | $1.620 |
| 30.6.2025 | $1.620 |
| 29.6.2025 | $1.620 |
| 31.3.2025 | $1.620 |
| 30.3.2025 | $1.620 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$683.99
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$286.60
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-58.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -3.6% | $5.88B | $5.40B |
| 2 | -2.1% | $5.76B | $4.85B |
| 3 | -0.5% | $5.73B | $4.42B |
| 4 | 1.0% | $5.78B | $4.10B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $5.93B | $3.85B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$6.10B
Terminal Value
$93.50B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$60.77B
Enterprise Value
$83.39B
Net Debt
$5.52B
Equity Value
$77.87B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$95.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$76.81
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Trefis · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
StockStory · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Deere & Company (DE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DE currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DE's estimated fair value is $286.60, which is 58.1% below the current price of $683.99. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DE's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $286.60 vs. price $683.99 (-58.1%); Revenue growth (last year): -11.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -27.8%.
Yes — DE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 957 | -957 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,079 | -1,079 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,929 | -2,929 | $650.18 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,775 | -1,775 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 199 | -199 | $655.91 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,775 | +1,775 | $343.94 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,049 | +1,049 | $438.44 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 975 | -975 | $651.43 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,049 | -1,049 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 391 | -391 | $654.22 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 363 | -363 | $652.75 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 1,079 | +1,079 | $254.83 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 3 | -3 | $656.64 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 957 | +957 | $377.01 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 1,775 | -2,762 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 4,439 | -1,544 | — |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 35,031 | +1,544 | $377.01 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 28,840 | +1,648 | $254.83 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 27,820 | -528 | $657.43 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 31,602 | +2,762 | $343.94 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 31,524 | -360 | $653.78 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 32,377 | -2,654 | $650.40 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 27,192 | -508 | $659.87 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 31,884 | -120 | $652.60 |
| CAMPBELL RYAN D | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.8.2026 | 33,487 | +1,885 | $438.44 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,251,648 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,289,736 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
68.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology