Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$187.67
▼ $0.12 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 03:15 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.33B
Day Range
$185.00 - $187.97
52-Week Range
$144.75 - $210.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$171.63
Resistance
$198.98
+1.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/23 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $825.32 vs. price $187.67 (+339.8%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202672
This Week
73
7D Ago
→ -1
Stable
Technical
69
7D Ago: 73
↓ -4
Fundamental
65
7D Ago: 65
→ 0
Growth
82
7D Ago: 82
→ 0
Valuation
67
7D Ago: 67
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $189.92
Evidence: 8 bullish / 4 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
72 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 29, 2026
Then
74
$186.29
Now
72
$187.67
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
No data available
Value
67
Momentum
69
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
65
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of HCI Group, Inc. has primarily focused on its strong financial performance and investor optimism. The Tampa-based insurer reported robust second-quarter earnings, with pre-tax income and earnings per share rising significantly year-over-year. Analysts have raised price targets, suggesting a potential 25% stock upside, though skepticism remains about overly optimistic Wall Street recommendations. The company’s growth momentum and bullish analyst sentiment are key recurring themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about HCI Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
65
Technical
69
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a **narrative-reality gap** (55 vs. 38) where positive sentiment and momentum create euphoric undertones, but valuation extremes (-77% vs. DCF) temper overconfidence. Herding is active due to relative underperformance, while FOMO remains muted by neutral volume and RSI. The key question: *Is the momentum-driven rally justified by fundamentals, or is the gap signaling a disconnect?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:46 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Pre-tax income climbed to $111 million from $94 million a year earlier, and diluted earnings per share rose to $5.60 from $5.18"
"The average brokerage recommendation (ABR) for HCI Group (HCI) is equivalent to a Buy"
"solid earnings estimate revisions might translate into an upside in the stock"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 39/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Smith's buy‑and‑hold criteria, the model estimates HCI scores a perfect 100, indicating strong alignment with his long‑term value creation principles. Lynch, Fisher and Graham (defensive) also rate it highly (96, 93, 81) because the stock shows robust growth prospects and solid quality that meet their growth‑and‑quality thresholds. In contrast, Marks, the efficient‑market view, Livermore and others give middling to low scores (44‑58) reflecting concerns about high expectations, lack of a clear price trend, and limited edge over the broader market. The spread of scores therefore stems from each methodology’s emphasis—some prioritize long‑term intrinsic value and earnings growth, while others weight valuation safety, market cycles, and statistical advantage, leading to differing overall assessments.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 81
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 81
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 77
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 56
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 55
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 39
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
33.2%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
28.7%
ROA
11.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$24.58
Cash
$1.21B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.8.2026 | $0.400 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.400 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.400 |
| 20.2.2026 | $0.400 |
| 19.2.2026 | $0.400 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.400 |
| 20.11.2025 | $0.400 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.400 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.400 |
| 21.2.2025 | $0.400 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$187.67
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$825.32
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+339.8%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
22.2%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.2% | $538.61M | $494.14M |
| 2 | 17.3% | $631.60M | $531.60M |
| 3 | 12.3% | $709.55M | $547.90M |
| 4 | 7.4% | $762.21M | $539.97M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $781.26M | $507.77M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$440.82M
Terminal Value
$12.32B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$8.01B
Enterprise Value
$10.63B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$10.63B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$80.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$80.63
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
StockStory · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 72/100, rated "Strong" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HCI currently scores 72/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, HCI's estimated fair value is $825.32, which is 339.8% above the current price of $187.67. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
HCI's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $825.32 vs. price $187.67 (+339.8%); Revenue growth (last year): 20.1%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 155.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; ROC 12 days: -0.4%.
Yes — HCI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Politis Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Politis Gregory | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Madhu Sanjay | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Watts Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Burks Robert Wayne | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Burks Robert Wayne | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Watts Susan | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Politis Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Politis Gregory | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Madhu Sanjay | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.6.2026 | 750 | +750 | — |
| Graham Andrew L. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 13,379 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Coleman Karin Sue | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 13,379 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Harmsworth James Mark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 13,379 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Saravanos Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 13,384 | -13,384 | $157.79 |
| Coleman Karin Sue | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 0 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Graham Andrew L. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 0 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Saravanos Anthony | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 0 | -13,384 | $157.79 |
| Harmsworth James Mark | Tax Withholding in Shares | 22.5.2026 | 0 | -13,379 | $157.79 |
| Patel Paresh | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.2.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $40.00 |
| Patel Paresh | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.2.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $40.00 |
| Patel Paresh | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.2.2026 | 89,500 | +20,000 | $40.00 |
| Patel Paresh | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.2.2026 | 90,000 | -20,000 | $40.00 |
| Harmsworth James Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.12.2025 | 1,251 | +1,251 | — |
| Coleman Karin Sue | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.12.2025 | 1,251 | +1,251 | — |
| Saravanos Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.12.2025 | 621 | +621 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
550,791 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 457,784 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology