Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$87.42
▲ $0.36 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/16 04:29 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$10.13B
Day Range
$87.17 - $87.97
52-Week Range
$79.42 - $112.84
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
DCI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+8.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $41.72 vs. price $87.42 (-52.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
34
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
54
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Donaldson Company, Inc. has highlighted its strong financial performance and investor confidence. The company reported its first billion-dollar quarter in history, with record sales of $3.9 billion and a 17.5% operating margin, alongside a 12% rise in adjusted earnings per share. Analysts, including Baird’s Richard Eastman, maintained an "Outperform" rating while raising the price target to $110. Additionally, leadership participation—such as Chairman Tod E. Carpenter exercising stock options—was noted, while the company’s upcoming presentations at major investor conferences underscored its focus on growth and strategic positioning.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Donaldson Company, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
76
Fundamentals
74
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 51) reflects traders fixating on the 2.5% support level, despite the stock’s 118% premium to DCF and mixed momentum. Overconfidence (45) and euphoria (35) coexist, driven by extreme valuation optimism, but weak momentum and neutral RSI temper extreme bias. The narrative gap (32) widens reality (42) from narrative (74), implying traders may overlook fundamental divergence. The key question: will traders break anchor at support or hold despite valuation disconnect?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:55 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$1 billion quarter (8% jump) with $3.9B total sales, 12% EPS growth, 17.5% operating margin (article 6)"
"Baird raises DCI price target to $110 from $105 (article 9)"
"7/10 dividend rating, 1.65% yield, strong profitability (article 8)"
"Q2 revenue up 8% YoY, GAAP profit growth, acquisition momentum (article 12)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s evaluation splits sharply between cyclical and fundamental investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock is near a cyclical low, aligning with his preference for oversold conditions, while Edgar Lawrence Smith and Gerald M. Loeb see it as a long-term hold—Smith calling it a ‘buy and hold for a decade’ candidate and Loeb approving its capital-preservation profile. In contrast, value-oriented methodologies like Benjamin Graham’s (both Defensive and Enterprising Investor) and Philip Fisher’s reject it outright, scoring poorly due to perceived overvaluation or lack of quality/growth traits. Meanwhile, efficient-market theorists and Howard Marks dismiss it as unexceptional or overpriced, while growth-focused approaches like Peter Lynch’s or Thorstein Veblen’s flag it as speculative or unsustainable. The divide highlights a tension between cyclical momentum (Nelson, Smith) and strict value/growth discipline (Graham, Fisher).
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 58
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 37
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 22
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$86.38
Range Bottom
$99.49
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
34.8%
Operating Margin
13.4%
Net Margin
9.9%
EBITDA Margin
16.1%
ROE
25.2%
ROA
12.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.09
Cash
$180.40M
Total Debt
$671.20M
Current Ratio
1.93
Debt/Equity
0.46
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.320 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.320 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.300 |
| 11.2.2026 | $0.300 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.300 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.300 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.300 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.300 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.270 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$87.42
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$41.72
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-52.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7% | $352.60M | $323.48M |
| 2 | 3.4% | $364.68M | $306.94M |
| 3 | 3.1% | $376.05M | $290.38M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $386.61M | $273.88M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $396.27M | $257.55M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$339.90M
Terminal Value
$6.25B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.06B
Enterprise Value
$5.51B
Net Debt
$490.80M
Equity Value
$5.02B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$12.07
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
StockStory · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
ChartMill · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 27.8.2026
Donaldson Company, Inc. (DCI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DCI currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DCI's estimated fair value is $41.72, which is 52.3% below the current price of $87.42. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DCI's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 25.2% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.46.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $41.72 vs. price $87.42 (-52.3%); Calmar: 0.47 (3y annualized return 12.3% / max drawdown 26.2%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -9.8%.
Yes — DCI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carpenter Tod E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 3,032 | +3,032 | $42.72 |
| Carpenter Tod E. | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 3,032 | -3,032 | $91.00 |
| Carpenter Tod E. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 31.8.2026 | 3,032 | -3,032 | — |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 3,434 | +3,000 | $42.72 |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 0 | -3,000 | — |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 1,305 | -2,129 | $91.84 |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.8.2026 | 2,129 | -2,129 | $91.84 |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Pogalz Bradley J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 27.8.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $42.72 |
| Smiley Jacinth C | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 267 | +267 | $89.09 |
| Hilger Christopher M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 400 | +400 | $89.09 |
| Rautio Trudy A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 334 | +334 | $89.09 |
| Owens James | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 267 | +267 | $89.09 |
| Rautio Trudy A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 28,106 | +334 | $89.09 |
| Owens James | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 22,913 | +267 | $89.09 |
| Smiley Jacinth C | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 8,243 | +267 | $89.09 |
| Hilger Christopher M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.7.2026 | 16,244 | +400 | $89.09 |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 7,153 | -7,153 | — |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 6,600 | -6,600 | — |
| Owens James | Open Market Sale | 14.4.2026 | 6,600 | -6,600 | $89.21 |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 6,600 | +6,600 | $48.96 |
| Owens James | Open Market Sale | 14.4.2026 | 7,153 | -7,153 | $89.21 |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 7,153 | +7,153 | $42.26 |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 29,718 | +7,153 | $42.26 |
| Owens James | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.4.2026 | 29,165 | +6,600 | $48.96 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,738,312 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,380,639 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology