Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$15.98
▼ $0.01 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/24 08:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$3.00B
Day Range
$15.98 - $16.00
52-Week Range
$8.94 - $16.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$15.72
Resistance
$16.00
DBRG is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+29.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.87 vs. price $15.98 (+24.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.03 (3y annualized return -2.1% / max drawdown 67.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
55
Value
62
Momentum
69
Risk
56
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
55
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of DigitalBridge Group, Inc. highlights its strategic expansion and financial shifts. The company announced plans to voluntarily delist its preferred stock from the NYSE ahead of a potential acquisition by SoftBank, while also opening a Tokyo office to strengthen its presence in Japan. Additionally, DigitalBridge secured the acquisition of PLUS ES, Australia’s largest smart meter provider, and passed technical and growth screens like the Minervini Trend Template. CEO Marc Ganzi’s warnings about AI infrastructure risks echo broader industry caution.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about DigitalBridge Group, Inc.. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
97
Fundamentals
55
Technical
69
Valuation
62
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
27
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
-11
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DBRG’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, with traders fixated on the 0.3% gap below resistance. The narrative-reality gap (-18) hints at a disconnect where perceived value (narrative) underestimates current fundamentals (reality). Herding is present but weak, as the stock underperformed peers, and no signs of FOMO, panic, or euphoria exist. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the stock remain trapped by this psychological barrier?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:41 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"DigitalBridge announced intention to voluntarily delist preferred stock from the NYSE in connection with its anticipated acquisition by an affiliate of SoftBank Group"
"DigitalBridge Group opened its Tokyo office to expand its Japan platform and strengthen investment origination capabilities"
"DigitalBridge-managed investment vehicle agreed to acquire PLUS ES, a leading Australian smart meter provider"
"CEO Marc Ganzi compared today's AI infrastructure frenzy to the late 1990s fiber overbuild, warning investors about potential debt risks"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply between those favoring growth potential and patient holding versus those skeptical of its timing or valuation. The highest-scoring approaches—like Morgan Housel’s (100) and Peter Lynch’s (82)—see it as a quiet, long-term compounder or an underpriced growth candidate, emphasizing its alignment with patient, value-creation-driven strategies. Meanwhile, more conservative or cyclical frameworks, such as Jesse Livermore’s (37) and Jack Schwager’s (27), flag it as a negative trend or lacking a clear setup, prioritizing trend-following or disciplined exclusion. Even Graham’s two variants split: the Defensive Investor (57) is lukewarm, while the Enterprising Investor (25) dismisses it outright, illustrating how valuation thresholds can swing conclusions. The middle ground—Marks (82/60), Fisher (64), and Nelson (55)—balances cautious optimism with mid-cycle pragmatism, suggesting it’s neither a slam dunk nor a red flag, but a case of moderate appeal.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 82
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 82
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 79
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 54
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 10
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$15.72
Range Bottom
$16.00
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
151.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
6.7%
ROA
4.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.46
Cash
$382.51M
Total Debt
$298.80M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.010 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.010 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.010 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.010 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.010 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.010 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.010 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.010 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.010 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.010 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.010 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.010 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$15.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.87
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+24.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $245.08M | $224.84M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $237.42M | $199.83M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $234.45M | $181.04M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $235.92M | $167.13M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $241.82M | $157.16M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$257.98M
Terminal Value
$3.81B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.48B
Enterprise Value
$3.41B
Net Debt
$-83.70M
Equity Value
$3.49B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.99
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.07
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Business Wire · 23.9.2026
CNW Group · 22.9.2026
Business Wire · 22.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 21.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Business Wire · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Business Wire · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
Bloomberg · 7.8.2026
DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (DBRG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DBRG currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DBRG's estimated fair value is $19.87, which is 24.4% above the current price of $15.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DBRG's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.87 vs. price $15.98 (+24.4%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 557.1%; Free cash flow growth: 356.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.03 (3y annualized return -2.1% / max drawdown 67.2%); Revenue growth (last year): -84.5%; -2.7% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — DBRG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curtin Nancy Ann | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 86 | +86 | $15.73 |
| Rasheed Shaka | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 43 | +43 | $15.73 |
| Brown James Keith | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 35 | +35 | $15.73 |
| Curtin Nancy Ann | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 133,069 | +86 | $15.73 |
| Brown James Keith | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 53,020 | +35 | $15.73 |
| Rasheed Shaka | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 66,222 | +43 | $15.73 |
| Curtin Nancy Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Tolley David | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Mayrhofer Thomas B | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 127,470 | +127,470 | — |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Stewart Liam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 101,976 | +101,976 | — |
| Brown James Keith | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Diefenderfer Jeannie | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Teh Tracey | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 25,494 | +25,494 | — |
| Goldschein Geoffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 60,548 | +60,548 | — |
| Jenkins Benjamin J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 101,976 | +101,976 | — |
| Rasheed Shaka | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 11,190 | +11,190 | — |
| Ganzi Marc C | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 229,764 | +229,764 | — |
| WINTROB JAY S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 19,265 | +11,190 | — |
| Tolley David | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 58,997 | +11,190 | — |
| McCray Gregory James | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 68,751 | +11,190 | — |
| REISS DALE ANNE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 92,826 | +11,190 | — |
| Diefenderfer Jeannie | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 86,074 | +11,190 | — |
| Curtin Nancy Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 132,983 | +11,190 | — |
| Stewart Liam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 309,373 | +101,976 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,251,269 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 12,310,093 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
30.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 29.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology