Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$53.69
▼ $0.45 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:46 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$5.40B
Day Range
$53.04 - $54.60
52-Week Range
$19.62 - $54.64
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$29.80
Resistance
$54.64
CVI is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+58.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 350.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.6% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (60/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
85
Risk
34
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
38
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CVR Energy Inc. has focused on its stock performance and valuation, with mixed analyst sentiment. The company was downgraded to "hold" as shares approached a $46 fair value, while technical analyses highlighted strong momentum and potential pullback opportunities. Analysts debated whether upside is already priced in, noting stretched returns and narrow losses despite a new dividend. No direct company-specific operational or strategic updates were provided.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CVR Energy Inc.. News trend score: 32. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 4 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
66
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
73
Fundamentals
38
Technical
85
Valuation
45
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+96%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+20
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring (93) reflects traders fixating on resistance, while euphoria (75) and FOMO (72) suggest overvaluation and momentum-driven buying. Confirmation bias (48) may amplify this as fundamentals (revenue flat, margins unchanged) lag narrative hype. The key tension lies between technical resistance and stretched valuations—will traders break free from the anchor, or will momentum sustain euphoria? Overconfidence (44) hints at price decoupling from fundamentals, but herding (60) remains modest, limiting extreme dispersion.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:53 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"CVR Energy (CVI) Draws Options Attention, Is The Upside Already Priced In?"
"Do Options Traders Know Something About CVR Energy Stock We Don't?"
"Does Narrower Losses and a New Dividend Payout Change The Bull Case For CVR Energy (CVI)?"
"CVR Energy passes Minervini Trend Template with high growth momentum, but is extended after a strong run."
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a stark divide among historical methodologies, with some seeing strong potential while others flag severe risks. Jesse Livermore’s high score reflects his focus on price action trends, suggesting the stock aligns with his momentum-driven approach, while Thorstein Veblen and Peter Lynch also see growth potential—Veblen emphasizing real value creation and Lynch noting undervaluation relative to future earnings. However, the majority of investors—particularly those like Benjamin Graham (defensive), Howard Marks, and Morgan Housel—warn of overvaluation, excessive risk, or cyclical overbought conditions, with scores as low as 0 or 1. Even Jack Schwager’s neutral stance contrasts sharply with the bullish signals from Livermore and Lynch, highlighting differing priorities between trend-following and fundamental risk assessment. The debate ultimately hinges on whether the stock’s momentum or growth justifies its valuation—or if it’s a speculative bubble ripe for correction.
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 86
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 74
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 70
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 28
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 24
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 24
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 11
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 1
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
4.8%
Operating Margin
2.5%
Net Margin
0.4%
EBITDA Margin
8.2%
ROE
3.7%
ROA
0.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.27
Cash
$511.00M
Total Debt
$1.70B
Current Ratio
1.79
Debt/Equity
2.33
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $0.100 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.100 |
| 10.5.2026 | $0.100 |
| 12.8.2024 | $0.500 |
| 11.8.2024 | $0.500 |
| 10.5.2024 | $0.500 |
| 9.5.2024 | $0.500 |
| 1.3.2024 | $0.500 |
| 29.2.2024 | $0.500 |
| 10.11.2023 | $2.000 |
| 9.11.2023 | $2.000 |
| 11.8.2023 | $1.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.26
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.26
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 9 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
ChartMill · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Barrons.com · 14.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
Yahoo · 10.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Yahoo · 8.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
CVR Energy Inc. (CVI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CVI currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CVI's technical score is 85/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 350.0%; Net income growth: 285.7%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.6% of price; Calmar: 0.29 (3y annualized return 16.9% / max drawdown 57.7%); Revenue growth (last year): -5.9%.
Yes — CVI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 24.2.2026 | 275,012 | +275,012 | $21.41 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 24.2.2026 | 71,201,875 | +275,012 | $21.41 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 23.2.2026 | 244,940 | +244,940 | $20.75 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 23.2.2026 | 70,926,863 | +244,940 | $20.75 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 20.2.2026 | 263,452 | +263,452 | $20.78 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 20.2.2026 | 70,681,923 | +263,452 | $20.78 |
| Capps J. Travis Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.2.2026 | 27,824 | +27,824 | — |
| Capps J. Travis Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.2.2026 | 27,824 | +27,824 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 13,962 | -13,962 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 17,388 | -17,388 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2025 | 52,972 | +52,972 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 28,948 | -28,948 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 28,948 | -28,948 | $33.98 |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 28,948 | +28,948 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 9,144 | -9,144 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 13,962 | +13,962 | — |
| LAMP DAVID L | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 17,388 | -17,388 | $33.98 |
| LAMP DAVID L | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 13,962 | -13,962 | $33.98 |
| LAMP DAVID L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 17,388 | +17,388 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2025 | 15,797 | +15,797 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 4,116 | -4,116 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 5,307 | -5,307 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 4,116 | -4,116 | $33.98 |
| Neumann Dane J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 6,607 | +6,607 | — |
| Neumann Dane J. | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 6,607 | -6,607 | $33.98 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,353,732 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,447,876 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
75.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology