Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$12.40
▼ $0.36 (-2.8%)
Market data updated: 09/23 07:33 AM
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$7.61B
Day Range
$12.38 - $12.89
52-Week Range
$8.69 - $14.21
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$10.26
Resistance
$12.89
+33.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 11/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
No notable concerns identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
76/100
Similarity
7
Historical Matches
71/100
Analog Quality
-7.0%
Median 40D Outcome
60/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
14%
+15.8% … +15.8%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
86%
-8.1% … -2.6%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 20 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 7 similar historical cases for this stock, 14% (95% CI 3%–51%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of -3.4%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 29% (8%–64%) | -6.6% | -8.3% … +1.1% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 57% (25%–84%) | +2.8% | -8.1% … +4.5% | +1.1% |
| 20D | 14% (3%–51%) | -3.4% | -8.0% … -2.1% | -0.3% |
| 40D | 14% (3%–51%) | -7.0% | -8.5% … -1.8% | -0.6% |
| 60D | 29% (8%–64%) | -2.7% | -6.3% … +1.3% | -1.0% |
Sample size: 7 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | 76/100 | High Volatility | -9.8% | +0.6% |
| 2026-06-01 | 71/100 | ✓ Uptrend | -8.2% | -8.4% |
| 2026-04-08 | 69/100 | Uptrend | -7.8% | -11.1% |
| 2026-03-20 | 66/100 | Consolidation | -2.3% | +1.9% |
| 2026-05-06 | 53/100 | Consolidation | -1.9% | -2.7% |
| 2026-04-22 | 43/100 | Consolidation | -3.4% | -4.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | 39/100 | Consolidation | +15.8% | +12.4% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity.
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
CRESY demonstrates a robust technical profile, supported by a strong investor score of 74 and an overall rating of STRONG. The stock sits above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling sustained upward momentum, while the MACD histogram remains positive, reinforcing bullish momentum. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) of 65.1 indicates healthy upward momentum without overstretching, though the %K value of 87.4 suggests the stock is technically overbought, which could imply a near-term pullback risk. The stock has also outperformed its benchmark by +7.2% over the past three months, further validating its relative strength. However, the lack of explicit news-driven catalysts or recent company-specific developments keeps the news score at a neutral 50, while risk metrics—such as a moderate ATR of 3.6% and a Sharpe ratio of 0.55—highlight volatility and a historical drawdown potential of 39.9% over three years, tempering enthusiasm.
The stock is positioned above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 65.1 indicating strong upward momentum, though it is currently overbought (%K 87.4).
Technical strength suggests sustained bullish momentum, but overbought conditions may signal a potential short-term correction.
No recent news or company-specific developments are reflected in the data, resulting in a neutral news score of 50.
Lack of news-driven catalysts means the stock’s performance relies entirely on technical and market factors rather than fundamental or external drivers.
The ATR stands at 3.6% of the stock price, and the Sharpe ratio is 0.55, with a historical three-year drawdown of 39.9% despite a 21.8% annualized return.
These metrics indicate moderate volatility and significant downside risk, which could impact investor confidence during market downturns.
StockIQ conclusion
CRESY exhibits a compelling technical profile with clear bullish momentum, supported by strong moving average alignment and positive momentum indicators. However, its overbought status and moderate volatility introduce near-term caution, while the absence of news-driven catalysts limits broader appeal. The stock’s risk profile, though historically volatile, aligns with its outperformance, making it a candidate for investors prioritizing technical strength over fundamental or news-based drivers. Monitoring for a potential pullback or external catalysts will be key to assessing its next leg of movement.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202678
This Week
73
7D Ago
↑ +5
Improving
Technical
94
7D Ago: 87
↑ +7
News
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Risk
50
7D Ago: 50
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
📊 Score History
78
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $12.40
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $12.40
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
78 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
73
$11.92
Now
78
$12.40
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
94
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
52
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A.. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 0 vs. 0 out of the last 4 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
24
Fundamentals
—
Technical
94
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
50
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+0
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 10/100
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 66
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 27
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 10
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (11 bullish · 0 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 28.11.2025 | $0.624 |
| 2.12.2024 | $0.595 |
| 10.6.2024 | $0.374 |
| 6.12.2023 | $0.355 |
| 31.5.2023 | $0.299 |
| 1.12.2022 | $0.136 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 4 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 4 articles.
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. (CRESY) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CRESY specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CRESY's technical score is 94/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Yes — CRESY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 13 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $1.05 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 615,736 | -10,000 | $1.05 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $1.10 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $1.06 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 20,000 | -20,000 | $1.17 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 22.7.2026 | 645,736 | -20,000 | $1.17 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $1.13 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 665,736 | -15,000 | $1.13 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 4,385 | -4,385 | $1.11 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 6.7.2026 | 680,736 | -4,385 | $1.11 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 70,000 | -70,000 | $1.26 |
| Elsztain Fernando Adrian | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 685,121 | -70,000 | $1.26 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 5.6.2026 | 18,200 | +18,200 | $10.95 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 5.6.2026 | 1,225,764 | +18,200 | $10.95 |
| Zang Saul | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 17,000 | +17,000 | $10.63 |
| Zang Saul | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 334,720 | +17,000 | $10.63 |
| ELSZTAIN EDUARDO S | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2026 | 8,823 | +8,823 | $10.67 |
| ELSZTAIN EDUARDO S | Open Market Purchase | 14.5.2026 | 9,854,101 | +8,823 | $10.67 |
| ELSZTAIN EDUARDO S | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 58,595 | +58,595 | $10.57 |
| ELSZTAIN EDUARDO S | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 9,845,278 | +58,595 | $10.57 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 23.4.2026 | 4,458 | +4,458 | $11.20 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 23.4.2026 | 1,207,564 | +4,458 | $11.20 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2026 | 4,458 | +4,458 | $11.20 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2026 | 8,917 | +8,917 | $11.25 |
| Elsztain Alejandro Gustavo | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2026 | 1,203,206 | +4,458 | $11.20 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
828,938 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 591,612 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology