Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$55.29
▲ $1.51 (+2.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 12:26 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$10.51B
Day Range
$54.10 - $55.92
52-Week Range
$51.01 - $89.83
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$51.01
Resistance
$78.11
COO is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
-16.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 50.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $26.20 vs. price $55.29 (-52.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
61/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
84/100
Analog Quality
+6.8%
Median 40D Outcome
62/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
80%
+6.1% … +14.5%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.2% … -0.2%
🔴 Bearish
13%
-5.5% … -3.8%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 80% (95% CI 55%–93%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +8.7%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Echo #2 — Oversold Reversal
1 occurrence(s) · 100% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 80% (55%–93%) | +5.2% | +2.2% … +8.1% | +0.3% |
| 10D | 87% (62%–96%) | +5.2% | +4.3% … +9.0% | +0.5% |
| 20D | 80% (55%–93%) | +8.7% | +3.9% … +13.8% | +0.8% |
| 40D | 87% (62%–96%) | +6.8% | +2.2% … +13.0% | +0.5% |
| 60D | 73% (48%–89%) | +9.4% | -0.3% … +24.0% | +1.0% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-02 | 61/100 | Downtrend | +8.7% | +10.6% |
| 2022-05-09 | 55/100 | Downtrend | +11.5% | +5.1% |
| 2020-03-23 | 54/100 | High Volatility | +18.5% | +24.3% |
| 2022-09-30 | 49/100 | Downtrend | +4.4% | +26.4% |
| 2025-06-17 | 48/100 | High Volatility | +6.5% | -3.0% |
| 2025-09-05 | 47/100 | Downtrend | +3.5% | +13.7% |
| 2026-05-11 | 47/100 | Downtrend | +16.3% | +24.3% |
| 2022-08-31 | 46/100 | Downtrend | -6.3% | +9.4% |
| 2025-04-08 | 46/100 | Downtrend | +13.6% | +2.5% |
| 2022-10-17 | 45/100 | Downtrend | +20.9% | +34.3% |
| 2025-03-13 | 44/100 | Downtrend | -3.0% | -7.4% |
| 2025-09-25 | 43/100 | Downtrend | +11.4% | +23.7% |
| 2022-06-22 | 42/100 | Downtrend | +4.8% | -3.3% |
| 2025-08-06 | 40/100 | Downtrend | -0.2% | +2.9% |
| 2022-07-14 | 40/100 | Downtrend | +13.9% | -9.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLV (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
6d ago · $53.91
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 55 to 83 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
9d ago · $63.48
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 26 to 55 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 23, 2026
Then
60
$76.22
Now
44
$55.29
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
6
Risk
46
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
63
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING COO...
Recent media coverage of **The Cooper Companies (COO)** has primarily centered on its upcoming **Q3 earnings report** (scheduled for September 2026), with analysts anticipating insights into financial performance and key metrics. Additional focus includes strategic discussions around **potential divestitures**, such as CooperSurgical, and **cash flow improvements**, alongside growth in premium lens products and margin expansion. Notably, there is also mention of a **different company (Ostrom Climate Solutions, TSXV: COO)** in unrelated carbon credit reporting, which should not be confused with The Cooper Companies.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Cooper Companies (The). News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
55
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
62
Fundamentals
63
Technical
6
Valuation
38
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-18%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (85) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.7% support level, likely due to its proximity. Herding (82) aligns with peers’ identical movement, but euphoria (35) and overconfidence (45) are muted by weak momentum and valuation disconnects. The narrative gap (24) hints at a disconnect between positive sentiment and technical realities. The key question: will traders break support or hold near the anchor despite valuation extremes?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:47 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wall Street's top-and-bottom-line estimate forecasts for The Cooper Companies (COO) for the quarter ended July 2026"
"possible CooperSurgical sale"
"stronger cash flow & margin gains"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 32/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between momentum-driven and fundamental investors. At the top of the spectrum, technical analysts like Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Morgan Housel see it as a compelling opportunity—Nelson’s cycle model flags it as oversold, while Housel and Jack Schwager praise its compounding potential and disciplined setup. Meanwhile, value-focused strategists like Benjamin Graham and Peter Lynch dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it deficient in defensive metrics and Lynch rejecting its growth profile. The middle ground is occupied by pragmatists like Gerald Loeb and Philip Fisher, who acknowledge its merits but temper enthusiasm with concerns about crowd behavior or liquidity. Even efficient-market theorists and Howard Marks lean skeptical, questioning whether the stock’s case is strong enough to justify active selection over passive indexing.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 88
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 75
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 59
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 58
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 48
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 48
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 37
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
65.5%
Operating Margin
16.7%
Net Margin
9.2%
EBITDA Margin
25.9%
ROE
4.6%
ROA
3.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.88
Cash
$110.60M
Total Debt
$2.50B
Current Ratio
1.89
Debt/Equity
0.30
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.7.2023 | $0.008 |
| 25.7.2023 | $0.008 |
| 20.1.2023 | $0.008 |
| 19.1.2023 | $0.008 |
| 26.7.2022 | $0.008 |
| 25.7.2022 | $0.008 |
| 20.1.2022 | $0.008 |
| 19.1.2022 | $0.008 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$55.29
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$26.20
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-52.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.4% | $465.61M | $427.17M |
| 2 | 6.1% | $494.22M | $415.98M |
| 3 | 4.9% | $518.58M | $400.44M |
| 4 | 3.7% | $537.85M | $381.02M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $551.29M | $358.30M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$433.70M
Terminal Value
$8.69B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.65B
Enterprise Value
$7.63B
Net Debt
$2.39B
Equity Value
$5.24B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$41.19
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Cooper Companies (The) (COO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 44/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
COO currently scores 44/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, COO's estimated fair value is $26.20, which is 52.6% below the current price of $55.29. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
COO's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 50.5%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.30.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $26.20 vs. price $55.29 (-52.6%); ATR: 4.5% of price; Calmar: -0.25 (3y annualized return -13.1% / max drawdown 52.1%).
Yes — COO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keel Paul A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 2,814 | +2,814 | — |
| Keel Paul A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 2,814 | +2,814 | — |
| Kurzius Lawrence Erik | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| Kurzius Lawrence Erik | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | -3,322 | — |
| Kurzius Lawrence Erik | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | +3,322 | — |
| Lucchese Cynthia L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| Lucchese Cynthia L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | -3,322 | — |
| Lucchese Cynthia L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | +3,322 | — |
| MADDEN TERESA S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | -3,322 | — |
| MADDEN TERESA S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| MADDEN TERESA S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | +3,322 | — |
| Rosebrough Walter M Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| Carbone Barbara | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| Jay Colleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 4,157 | +4,157 | — |
| Carbone Barbara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,050 | -3,050 | — |
| Carbone Barbara | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,050 | +3,050 | — |
| Jay Colleen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | -3,322 | — |
| Rivas Maria | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| Jay Colleen | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | +3,322 | — |
| Rivas Maria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | -3,322 | — |
| Rivas Maria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,322 | +3,322 | — |
| WEISS ROBERT S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 3,779 | +3,779 | — |
| WEISS ROBERT S | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 3,654 | -3,654 | — |
| Rosebrough Walter M Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 832 | +832 | — |
| Rosebrough Walter M Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.4.2026 | 832 | -832 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,781,003 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 8,344,882 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
16.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology