Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$14.78
▼ $0.32 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/23 05:15 PM
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$1.80B
Day Range
$14.51 - $14.83
52-Week Range
$10.84 - $18.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$13.84
Resistance
$16.03
CMRE is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+22.9% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 2/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.29 (3y annualized return 17.2% / max drawdown 59.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
30
Risk
42
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Costamare Inc. highlights mixed investor sentiment around its financial performance. While the company reported a Q2 earnings beat—with adjusted EPS of $0.62 and revenue exceeding estimates—stock price declines followed profit-taking after a prior rally. Analysts note strong profitability and a $6.1 billion backlog but raise concerns about low dividends and rising leverage. Insider sales and valuation screens (like Peter Lynch’s) suggest potential growth value, though volatility persists amid fluctuating market reactions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Costamare Inc. Common Stock $0.0001 par value. News trend score: 68. Reason: 6 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
7
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
7
Fundamentals
—
Technical
30
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CMRE’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders appear fixated on the 3.1% gap below resistance, despite modest FOMO and herding signals. The narrative-reality gap (5 points) hints at mild misalignment, but no extreme bias is evident. Key uncertainty lies in whether traders will break or hold near resistance—momentum alone isn’t strong enough to override anchoring. The absence of panic or overconfidence suggests a cautious, level-headed environment, though FOMO’s presence could escalate if momentum sustains.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:14 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Costamare (CMRE) reported quarterly earnings of $0.62 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.57 by 8.77 percent"
"Q2 2026 Adjusted Net Income from Continuing operations available to common stockholders of $75.1 million ($0.62 per share). Q2 2026 liquidity of $4"
"Costamare (CMRE) Q2 2026 earnings beat estimates, but stock slipped 1.7% pre-market on profit-taking after a strong rally"
"Costamare Insider Sold Shares Worth $917,916, According to a Recent SEC Filing"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for CMRE reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Charles Mackay’s high score and neutral verdict suggest he sees no speculative frenzy, while Howard Marks’ cautious mixed assessment hints at a business that may already be priced for perfection. Meanwhile, the majority—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—lack sufficient data to apply their core principles, leaving their models neutral or inconclusive. On the bearish end, Livermore, Schwager, and Veblen flag red flags like trend resistance, lack of disciplined setups, and unchecked growth motives, while Housel and Nelson warn of volatility and overbought conditions. The contrast underscores whether CMRE’s risks are speculative (Mackay) or structural (Livermore), or simply too ambiguous for traditional value/growth frameworks.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 89
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 69
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 37
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 22
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after a decline, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of an accumulation phase.
Low confidence
$13.84
Range Bottom
$16.03
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 21.7.2026 | $0.125 |
| 20.7.2026 | $0.125 |
| 20.4.2026 | $0.115 |
| 19.4.2026 | $0.115 |
| 21.7.2025 | $0.115 |
| 20.7.2025 | $0.115 |
| 17.4.2025 | $0.085 |
| 16.4.2025 | $0.085 |
| 21.1.2025 | $0.085 |
| 20.1.2025 | $0.085 |
| 21.10.2024 | $0.085 |
| 20.10.2024 | $0.085 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 16 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.7.2026
Associated Press · 27.7.2026
MT Newswires · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
ChartMill · 27.7.2026
Yahoo · 27.7.2026
Benzinga · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.7.2026
Yahoo · 24.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Costamare Inc. Common Stock $0.0001 par value (CMRE) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CMRE specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CMRE's technical score is 30/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; CMF 20 days: 0.07.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.29 (3y annualized return 17.2% / max drawdown 59.0%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — CMRE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 6 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zikos Grigorios | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 59,840 | -59,840 | $15.34 |
| Zikos Grigorios | Open Market Sale | 29.7.2026 | 0 | -59,840 | $15.34 |
| Konstantakopoulos Konstantinos | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 74,800 | +74,800 | — |
| Konstantakopoulos Konstantinos | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 3,799,032 | +74,800 | — |
| Konstantakopoulos Konstantinos | Other Transaction | 30.3.2026 | 74,800 | +74,800 | — |
| Konstantakopoulos Konstantinos | Other Transaction | 30.3.2026 | 3,724,232 | +74,800 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,350,720 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,056,221 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology